The truth about Atomic Bombs

A-bombs – or atomic bombs – are BIG JOKES but it is against a silly US law to say that they do not work, but, if you do, you, like me, are punished by death (!) … so here you have to learn the good news.

The a-bomb was created by two powerful, sick men in the 1940’s – US president/warlord F.D. Roosevelt and USSR dictator/mass murderer J. Stalin. Media assisted to back up their lies without any evidence what so ever! The people were made to believe that compressing atoms of two metal pieces making up a critical mass allowed one single neutron in between to fission one metal atom to start … an a-bomb explosion FLASH … spreading death and radiation. All about Fukushima radiation 2016! Nuclear terrorism was invented in 2010 by US president B. Obama. –
by Anders Björkman, M.Sc.

 

American and European nuclear scientists say since 1945 that atomic bombs work and media transmit the message. According Wikipedia (before it was modified August 2016) there are two types of nuclear fission: One type produces pure energy (actually steam) at nuclear power plants under moderated conditions and another, very nasty type drives the instantaneous explosion FLASH of a nuclear weapon that lasts some nanoseconds and kills and radiates innocent people

But the second type is pure pseudoscience to scare you and a BIG JOKE explained below.

Nuclear fission is only possible under moderated and controlled conditions to produce electricity. You should wonder whyWikipedia cannot say so!

Warning 1
Media and readers of my articles about a-bombs 1945,moon trips 1969,M/S Estonia ferry incident 1994 and 911 tower top down terrorist collapses 2001 are warned. You probably suffer from cognitive dissonance and cannot handle my information without getting mentally disturbed with serious consequences.

My proven facts are simple and correct and good news. A-bombs do not work (as explained below). Humans cannot travel to the Moon. M/S Estonia didn’t lose her bow visor. Skyscrapers do not collapse from top down. All information to the contrary is pseudoscience, propaganda lies or fantasies promoted by media and taught at universities. And if you do not agree with the official lies, you will not be allowed at the university boat race* and other silly events, etc. Your position in society is at risk.

If you suffer from cognitive dissonance, you no doubt find my info disturbing and get upset, angry, anxious or worried. What to believe and write? Old lies or truth?

Media incl. newspaper chief editors are kindly requested to get psychological assistance to get rid of their cognitive dissonance. Why not cure yourself? And publish the result as a scoop.

*Safety at sea is my business

Summary of this article
1. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were 71 years ago not destroyed by a-bombs 1945. The Japanese in their simple wood/paper shanty houses in the two towns were killed and burnt by US napalm carpet fire bombings. Fission can only occur inside a power plant under moderated conditions.

2. Two a-bombs exploding 71 years ago in Japan 1945 were just US wartime propaganda lies (false information) to impress the Soviet union.

3. USSR dictator Stalin wasn’t fooled. He (or his deputy Beria) invented/faked his own a-bomb 1949 with Uranium ore supplied by Wismut AG, Aue, Saxony, USSR occupied zone of Germany … with a little help of the USA and a friend of mine.


4. The 71 years old lies from 6 August 1945 about instantaneous fission releasing big amounts of energy in a FLASH are still working kept going strong by several governments, crazy generals and plenty physicists incl. Nobel prize winners that lie for their governments – and by mainstream media of course that are experts in publishing false info to brainwash you.5. It is illegal in the USA to tell the truth about a-bombs anyway. In spite of this the USA uses billions of dollars to maintain the hoax. Russia doesn’t spend a rouble or kopek to keep the show going.

6. France and China faked their a-bombs in the 1960’s. France has a much better weapon 2016.

7. 10 000’s of fake a-bombs have since 1946 been built, transported around, mishandled, dropped by mistake by incompetent soldiers but none has ever exploded. Reason is that an a-bomb cannot explode. It is physically impossible as shown by me in this article. Fission doesn’t work like that!

8. Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles, ICBMs, do not work either. A thermonuclear war is therefore not possible!

9. Nuclear arms are very safe and secure! They cannot harm anything. But it is illegal to say so!

10. The Islamic Republic of Iran is, according to plenty clowns, trying since 30 years to fake an a-bomb that Stalin did in four years 65 years ago assisted by Gulag prisoners and Wismut AG of Aue, Saxony.

11. The International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA, and its boss Yukiya Amano and the dictator of North Korea are part of the hoax. Just ask them about it. They are paid to lie about a-bombs. Just laugh at them and refer them to this web site.

12. The good news is that a-bombs do not work and are nothing to be afraid of. What to be afraid of are politicians, military and media believing in a-bombs!

13. Nuclear radiation exists but you should first inform yourself about it and then do not panic and be afraid about it. Most radiation is harmless.

Warning 2 for pseudoscience
Have you heard about Trofim Lyssenko? He was the inventor of pseudoscience around 1930! Stalin loved him. Ever heard about Stalin? A mass murderer that together with Hitler started WW2 by attacking east Poland and Finland 1939 and the Baltic states 1940 and who US president Roosevelt liked a lot. Stalin could keep east Poland and the Baltic states after WW2. Ever heard about Roosevelt? He created the a-bomb! With a little help from friends.

A-bombs were and are just propaganda. There is no evidence that they worked 1945 or later. The a-bomb was invented pseudoscientific style by an American – Robert O Lyssenko – a cousin of Trofim – but assisted by A. Einstein and encouraged by Roosevelt!

USA is the greatest military force on Earth since WW2 with shiny uniforms, medals, salutes, KIAs, MIAs, etc. And it has lost most wars since 1945 because it doesn’t use its a-bombs. Do you know why?

No a-bomb has ever exploded on planet Earth. The a-bombs are just a hoax to keep you afraid!

Roosevelt died 1945 with the secret. He was only 63. Seven years younger than me 2016, who is still young and beautiful (see photo top right) to tell brainwashed people the Truth many years on. It will upset many people and it is the whole purpose of my website.

“Like all the great religions of the past, The Nutwork presents a choice to us all: believe our stories or live in doubt. While their stories seem rather silly to us, they give feelings of security and purpose to others. These stories are the gospel of the religion of normality, if you will. You cannot be normal if you don’t believe in this gospel. You cannot function in society like your friends and family if you don’t believe in this gospel. You can’t just stop believing in the gospel of normality, because doing so would mean you have to find different answers to all the questions the gospel answered before. The gospel covers a massive emptiness in people. I can understand why people refuse to question it”.The RideNeverEnds

“In short, you can rest easier on this matter, because there is no chance we dropped any nuclear bombs on Japan. It simply didn’t happen. Japan knows that, Russia knows that, and the only ones who don’t know that are the citizens of the US, who have been propagandized into a state of mass idiocy. The whole nuclear scare wasn’t used mainly to keep the Russians at bay (since the Russians also never had any nukes). It was used mainly to keep US citizens in a state just short of panic for 70 years, and to keep military and Intelligence expenditures absurdly high”.

Miles W. Mathis

“A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.”

Samuel Clemens, aka “Mark Twain”

 

This article of fake a-bombs is in two parts and seven sections for easy reference. This is part 1:

1.1 Introduction to the a-bomb hoax 1942-2016 … by a random engineer 1.2 The B61 Silver Bullet a-bomb of 1963 – to be upgraded 2015 by Obama

1.3 A-bomb with parachute retarder

1.4 Increased accuracy of US a-bombs after 50 years service by Obama

1.5 The B61 Silver Bullet bomb will vaporize the plane dropping it – does Obama know?

1.6 The US War on terror 2014 – lost by Obama

1.7 Manne Siegbahn, 1924 Nobel prize (physics) winner

1.8 How to be politically correct – support atomic a-bombs or h-bombs vaporizing children

2.1 A-bombs – just propaganda to scare you

2.2 The one million °C heat and one thousand bar pressure blast wave with its positive and negative phases

2.3 Einstein

2.4 June 1942 work started on bomb to vaporize everything and three years later it was ready

2.5 A plane dropped the a-bomb 6 August 1945 – No parachute retarder

2.6 Napalm carpet bombing by terrorists

2.7 Klaus Fuchs

2.8 The Soviet a-bombs

2.9 Wismut AG

2.10 – 300 Stalin prizes

2.11 A-bomb radiation 1945 and similar things 2011 – how dangerous is radiation?

2.12 The French a-bombs … and h-bombs

2.13 The China a-bomb 1964

2.14 The US propaganda machine 2015 – Nuclear terrorism 2016

 Part 2 explains why a-bombs do not work.

 

1.1 Introduction to the a-bomb hoax 1942-2016 by a random engineer

It is worth repeating:

American, European nuclear scientists and their clowns hanging on to the joke say since 1945 that atomic bombs work and media transmit the message. According Wikipedia (before it was modified August 2016) nuclear fission produces

1) energy (steam) at nuclear power plants under moderated conditions to produce electricity and

2) drives the instantaneous explosion of a nuclear weapon that lasts some nanoseconds in a big FLASH (started by compressing metal to double density).

But 2) is pure pseudoscience to scare you and a BIG JOKE explained below and taught at universities. Fission is only possible under moderated conditions. I wonder why Wikipedia cannot say so! But if you don’t agree that fission also drives the explosion of nuclear fission in a big FLASH after metal has been compressed to double density, you will not pass your nuclear engineering university examination! It is very easy to manipulate public opinion in, e.g. Japan.

President Barack Obama intends to modernize the US useless nuclear weapons stationed in Germany! Obama has August 2016 approved the last phase of development for the atom-bomb model B61-12, the up-dated B61 Silver Bullet from 1963, which is to go into full-scale production from 2020. However it is a typical Obama joke! Like his nonsense 2010-2016 about nuclear terrorism described below!

I am happy to inform that the elimination of the human race, the animal and biological world populations in a thermonuclear war started by anybody is not possible. Below I explain in detail why.

Since 2010 854 000 people holding top-secret clearances of the US intelligence community haven’t been able to name a terrorist group trying to obtain a nuclear weapon. Reason is that a-bombs do not work. All nuclear warheads are dummies! Nothing to be afraid of! It is just a BIG JOKE! Only peaceful and safe nuclear power stations work.

But as American, European and Japanese (!) nuclear scientists incl. Nobel prize winners say since 1945 that atomic bombs work and media transmit this message all the time, it is difficult to realize that you have been fooled … by a BIG, STUPID JOKE!

How do I know this? Can I prove it?

Wasn’t I afraid of a-bombs as a small boy in the 1950’s? You bet I was. The authorities really scared my parents and me being vaporized by a-bombs or killed by the radiation! But it was all propaganda. All lies!

A Nobel prize winner, MS, (physics 1924) didn’t recommend physics as a career for me 1964. Same person, a clever scientist, I learnt later, had 19 years earlier, i.e. 1945, been asked by the Swedish government to design and build a Swedish (!) a-bomb… and agreed … subject to some conditions! I explain it below! Another friend of mine, WM, that I met 1999 assisted Stalin building the communist a-bomb 1948-1958 … für den Frieden … for Peace! I describe it also below. So a couple of years ago I found out through friends that I had been fooled about the 1940‘s built a-bombs since my early years.

The 1940′s a-bombs were all US propaganda.

Pure disinformation! Simple misinformation.

I conclude today it applies to all later versions of a-bombs, incl. the infamous B61 Silver Bullet from 1963 but still 2016 the mainstay of US military defences described below and as mentioned above to be newly produced again. All bullshit, actually.

Reason is that fission (explained below – release of atomic energy or heat) is only possible by moderated, slow neutrons(also explained below) inside a peaceful nuclear power station. Fission is not possible by instantaneous, fast, not moderated neutrons in an exploding a-bomb with a FLASH. It was not known, when the a-bomb was invented 1942 by some crazy scientists. The inventors thought that fast, not moderated neutrons, released by fission could exponentially produce more fission and release enormous amount of heat/energy at the speed of light in an a-bomb FLASH. But it doesn’t work like that. Fission is always moderated and controlled. Many people get upset about it. They are paid to lie about a-bombs!


And media will not publish the good news.
Fast neutrons, subatomic particles, just fly away at 20.000.000 m/s speed and disintegrate into other subatomic particles. For neutrons to produce fission in a nuclear power station, they must be moderated, i.e. slowed down 10.000 times to 2.000 m/s speed or less. But as all was secret 1945 the responsible parties decided to fake it to keep FDR happy. Wikipedia still cannot make any sense out of it.

The story of a-bombs destroying central Hiroshima and a suburb of Nagasaki August 1945 in great FLASHES is simple US propaganda. US and Japanese diplomats at Bern, Moscow and Stockholm agreed to fake it summer 1945 to end the war. Extensive napalm bombings took place in Japan 1944-1945 to burn down >60 cities, but the evidence of two a-bombs FLASHES with their mushroom clouds of dirty smoke was entirely fabricated in photo laboratories at the Lookout Mountain military animation community of Laurel Canyon, California, USA.

Every single nuclear weapon or a-bomb explosion FLASH was then the result of more photo manipulations and animations, aided by the skills of a tradition of Walt Disney/Cal Arts-style trained animators and their Soviet counterparts taught to manipulate the truth in secret. 

An a-bomb blast or fission does not produce dirty smoke! Smoke is carbon burnt with oxygen. There is no carbon and oxygen in an a-bomb.

Nuclear fission is just uranium or plutonium atoms splitting into smaller atoms (not carbon or oxygen) releasing pure energy/heat only under moderated conditions in a peaceful nuclear power station.

Fake USSR a-bomb exploding 29 August 1949 in a Kazhak desert to help the world proletariate and Stalin to conquer the world. Note the black, dirty, stratospheric smoke


End May 2016 US president B. Obama visited Hiroshima as first US president and there was a great show to remember the alleged 200 000 (!) dead according media due to the two a-bombs dropped on Japan 1945, when much fewer, <10 000, were injured and killed due to US napalm, carpet, terrorist bombing burning down the towns of paper/wood huts. The a-bomb propaganda, created by US government and military occupying Japan 1945/52 and associated censorship, just continues to be spread to scare people.
6 August 2016 USA celebrated that two a-bombs had exploded on Japan 71 years ago by imploding or compressing metal atoms. According Pew Center 56% of Americans think it was justified to wipe out 70 000 civilians, mostly old people, women and children at Hiroshima at once with one a-bomb and others at Nagasaki three days later with more casualties due to radiation later. The Americans don’t know it was all normal war propaganda to allow Japan to surrender 16 August 1945 to avoid an American and/or Soviet military invasion! Better just to stop shooting and bombing and invite the Americans to take over Japan without a fight. All fire proof, concrete buildings at central Hiroshima close to ‘ground zero’ survived easily.

No a-bombs ever exploded in FLASHES over Hiroshima and Nagasaki! Tets Kimura describes the official propaganda mainly based on fake records planted in the Hiroshima a-bomb museum!

Fission – the splitting of atoms by neutrons releasing energy and more neutrons – discovered already 1938 – works. It is only used in nuclear power plants under controlled/slow conditions using a moderator – normally water – to control the process. Energy – pure heat – is then produced (and some waste). Uncontrolled/fast fission – neutrons exponentially splitting atoms (Uranium or Plutonium pure metal) at the speed of light releasing during some nano-seconds more neutrons and enormous amounts of energy and particles in the air as an explosive FLASH – an a-bomb – creating a dirty mushroom cloud killing people – is not possible. The neutrons producing fission just fly away, disappear and do nothing else.Thousands of atomic experts, military and political fools disagree since 1945: you must compress the atoms of two pieces of pure Uranium or Plutonium metal first and then … one neutron will start an a-bomb fast fissionexplosion to be afraid of, they say. How it really works is a military secret, though? Compress metal atoms? It is a joke.


When I point out these basic facts 71 years later with full explanations added, why a-bombs do not work, many people think I am crazy and they ridicule me. Some even suggest on the Internet (all anonymous of course) that I am a Holocaust denier!
My history ideas are well known. I am not a Holocaust denier. I know it is illegal in many places to be a Holocaust denier, but why should I be one? Tell me! I know people that survived the Holocaust.Much more interesting is that I am an a-bomb FLASH denier! A very nasty person!

I simply suggest that any nuclear scientist stating that a-bombs work and produce FLASHES is a fraud!

A-bombs with their FLASHES and invisible radiation are inventions to scare you.

Maybe the nuclear scientists are frauds because it is illegal to be an a-bomb denier and that we a-bomb deniers can be punished to death (!!) in the USA. Media do not react! It is normal for them to support laws that threaten people to be killed, if they do not agree with something. Media and their assistants haven’t studied and reported the explanations below.

Google has nothing about a-bomb deniers.

Google has nothing about metal atoms compression.

Wikipedia has nothing about a-bomb deniers.

Wikipedia has nothing about metal atoms compression.

We a-bomb and metal atoms compression deniers do not exist!

Below I, a random engineer, describe why a-bombs do not work and that everything to the contrary is simple propaganda. There arefour basic reasons, in my opinion, why a-bombs do not work:

1. Stalin, the Soviet dictator 1928-1953 and creator of Lyssenko and a great friend of US president F.D Roosevelt, was the inventor of pseudoscience, and is said to have built a Soviet a-bomb in Siberia in only four years 1945-1949 using

(a) stolen information of the US a-bomb research Manhattan/Los Alamos project and

(b) Uranium metal extracted from ore mined by Wismut AG of Saxony, East Germany using German slave labour 1945-1947 and minimally paid German mine workers and a friend of mine later under top secret conditions.

But Wismut AG was and still is just propaganda and no Uranium was ever extracted from the German ore. It was just a typical Stalin/Beria stunt, like the Soviet a-bomb itself. Stalin just copied/pasted the US a-bomb nonsense to impress the world proletariat. And USA and Germany played along to keep the free world scared. According German sources (2015) Wismut AG had 43 000 employees 1989 and had 1946-1991 produced 220.000 tons of Uranium until it was suddenly closed 1991, etc, etc. How you can produce 220.000 tons of pure Uranium from ore that only contains 0.02% Uranium oxide is just silly propaganda.

The Stalin a-bomb was 100% pseudoscience!

2. Manne Siegbahn, Swedish 1924 Nobel prize winner physics was 1945 asked by the Swedish socialdemocratic government to become head of newly created military research FOA to develop a Swedish a-bomb. Manne agreed under the condition that all a-bomb info was first peer reviewed and then made public. The Swedish government decided not to appoint Manne that got US$ 1 million from the Rockefeller foundation to develop his cyclotron instead and to shut up. You do not joke about secret a-bombs! I knew Manne a little 1960-1965 and he didn’t recommend physics as a career for me 1964; too much politics!

Manne Siegbahn didn’t like pseudoscience!

3. The Islamic Republic of Iran has according US propaganda plans of to build an a-bomb since the 1970’s. The Islamic Republic since kicking out the US marionette shah 1979 is governed by a president (dictator) elected by the Iranian members of the priesthood (imams) and by a parliament and prime minister elected by the people. The Iranian presidents are against the a-bomb and deny any designs to build one. However the USA maintains that the Islamic Republic is secretly building an a-bomb, which can be ready in two to 15 years, etc, etc. I explain more below.

The Islamic republic knows how to handle pseudoscience!

4. Mushroom clouds! An atomic explosion is allegedly only fission (see below) producing during nano-seconds clean, pure energy – a FLASH and radiation. It does not produce smoke or gases or anything else visible. An a-bomb cannot produce a dirty, hot gas mushroom cloud.

A-bomb mushroom clouds are pseudoscience!

53 countries and 4 observing organizations and their leaders of the 2014 Nuclear Security Summit headed by U.S. President B.“Bomb” Obama apparently still believe that two metals (!) highly enriched Uranium and/or Plutonium can be used to manufacture nuclear weapons. They should study this web page and learn about pseudoscience.

As of mid-2014 Mr. Hans M. Kristensen and Mr. Robert S. Norris estimate that there are approximately 16.300 nuclear weaponslocated at some 98 sites in 14 countries. Roughly 10.000 of these weapons are in military arsenals; the remaining weapons are retired and awaiting dismantlement. USA controls a substantial part of them:

As of early 2015, the authors estimate that the US Defence Department maintains about 4,760 nuclear warheads. Of this number, they estimate that approximately 2,080 warheads are deployed while 2,680 warheads are in storage. In addition to the warheads in the Defence Department stockpile, approximately 2,340 retired but still intact warheads are in storage under the custody of the Energy Department and awaiting dismantlement, for a total US inventory of roughly 7,100 warheads. Since New START entered into force in February 2011, the United States has reported cutting a total of 158 strategic warheads and 88 launchers. It has plans to make some further reductions by 2018. Over the next decade, it also plans to spend as much as $350 billion on modernizing and maintaining its nuclear forces.

They should also study this web page. Imagine spending $350 billion on something that doesn’t work. It is pseudoscience.

Listen!

According Wikipedia:

Fission chain reactions occur because of interactions between neutrons and fissile isotopes. The chain reaction requires both (A) the release of neutrons from fissile isotopes undergoing nuclear fission and (B) the subsequent absorption of some of these neutrons in fissile isotopes.When an atom undergoes nuclear fission, a few neutrons (the exact number depends on several factors) are ejected from the reaction. These free neutrons will then interact with the surrounding medium (sic – i.e. other fissile isotopes), and if more fissile fuel (sic – isotopes) is present, some may be absorbed and cause more fission. Thus, the cycle repeats to give a reaction that is self-sustaining.

Nuclear power plants operate by precisely controlling the rate at which nuclear reactions occur, and that control is maintained through the use of several redundant layers of safety measures. Moreover, the materials in a nuclear reactor core and the Uranium enrichment level make a nuclear explosion impossible, even if all safety measures failed.

On the other hand, nuclear weapons are specifically engineered to produce a reaction that is so fast and intense it cannot be controlledafter it has started. When properly designed, this uncontrolled reaction can lead to an explosive energy release.”

Do you follow? There are two fission chain reactions; one precisely controlled and slow, i.e. moderated in a peaceful nuclear reactor of a power plant that can be started and stopped at will (discovered late 1930’s) and one fast that cannot be controlled – after it has started by mechanically compressing (!) two pieces of billions of Uranium 235 metal atoms together with a little neutron in between that will split the metal atoms in nano-seconds producing more neutrons driving the explosion (secretly invented as propagandaduring WWII).

Or is there only one reaction … without mechanical compression … doubling the density?

When one little uranium nucleus fissions into two daughter nuclei fragments, about 0.1 percent of the mass of the single uranium nucleus appears as the fission energy of ~200 MeV. For uranium-235 (total mean fission energy 202.5 MeV), typically ~169 MeV appears as the kinetic energy of the daughter nuclei, which fly apart at about 3% of the speed of light, due to Coulomb repulsion. Also, an average of 2.5 neutrons are emitted, with a mean kinetic energy per neutron of ~2 MeV (total of 4.8 MeV).The fission reaction (of one little uranium nucleus) also releases ~7 MeV in prompt gamma ray photons. The latter figure means that a nuclear fission explosion (?) or criticality accident (??) emits about 3.5% of its energy as gamma rays, less than 2.5% of its energy as fast neutrons (total of both types of radiation ~ 6%), and the rest as kinetic energy of fission fragments (this appears almost immediately when the fragments impact surrounding matter, as simple heat). In an atomic bomb, this heat may serve to raise the temperature of the bomb core to 100 million Kelvin and cause secondary emission of soft X-rays, which convert some of this energy to ionizing radiation. However, in nuclear reactors, the fission fragment kinetic energy remains as low-temperature heat, which itself causes little or no ionization.

Source

No – there are two! One (fake) where the temperature becomes 100 million Kelvin (a-bomb), one (real) low-temperature heat (nuclear power station). Let’s repeat!

Nuclear fission is a nuclear reaction in a nuclear reactor in which the nucleus of an atom is split into smaller parts (lighter nuclei) by a free, moderated (slow) neutron. A nuclear fission process produces, apart from energy, more free neutrons.

Nuclear fission therefore produces energy/heat for nuclear power stations. Nuclear power is possible because certain substances called nuclear fuels undergo fission, when struck by fission neutrons, and in turn emit free neutrons, when the nuclear fuel breaks apart. This makes possible a peaceful, self-sustaining, moderated (or precisely controlled – the neutrons are slowed down) nuclear chain reaction that releases pure energy/heat at a controlled rate in a nuclear reactor. Nuclear fission in a nuclear power plant just produces energy, heat, when the uranium atoms are split into smaller atoms. No smoke! No radiation! The nuclear fuel only becomes other, lighter atoms/molecules and heat. By preventing the neutrons to reach the nuclear fuels you can stop the process.

But can an uncontrolled nuclear fission chain reaction drive the explosion of nuclear weapons as suggested by Wikpedia and others (even if the Wikipedia description is changed all the time)?

A very rapid (at 3% of the speed of light!!), uncontrolled, exponential rate of nuclear fission started by one little fast neutron of a critical mass of pure, enriched metal Uranium 235 or Plutonium being suddenly mechanically compressed (!) in a nuclear weapon, i.e. an atomic bomb – an a-bomb – ending with a FLASH – is physically not possible and a silly idea in my honest opinion.

It is only foolish propaganda created by a small number of some idiots 1942/5 and still in force 2016, e.g. here! There is no evidence that mechanical compression of two pieces of pure Uranium or Plutonium metal to double density assisted by a mysterious ‘initiator‘ will suddenly allow one little neutron to start a fission chain reaction that cannot be controlled and that is finished in nano-seconds in a FLASH with a temperature of 100 000 000°K.

The whole idea is really stupid. Mechanical compression of two pieces of uranium or plutonium metal with a neutron in between produce an a-bomb explosion and a FLASH. It will not work, because there is nothing to moderate the released, free neutrons. The free neutrons just fly away and break down into other particles within minutes. No FLASH!

The hoax is today promoted by, apart from the people mentioned above and by the people here, by journalist Eric Schlosser in his book Command and Control: Nuclear Weapons, the Damascus Accident, and the Illusion of Safety published in September 2013 and by US history professor Alex Wellerstein. The latter has actually understood (or must have understood) that a-bombs FLASHES and critical masses are just simple, silly, magic tricks or illusions to impress the audience of the show but will not really admit it and thus preach the opposite. Wellerstein can be reached at wellerstein@gmail.com . Wellerstein said 7 January 2015 that:

“I’m a firm believer in the idea that sometimes non-academic historians stumble onto interesting things and interesting questions (John Coster-Mullen is a great example of this), and I don’t discriminate unless people show themselves to be going down truly untenable paths (like that small segment of the Internet who believes that all nuclear weapons are a hoax, which is just a truly silly “theory”).3

John Coster-Mullen is an American truck driver that has built his own a-bomb with parts bought on eBay! It evidently does not work.

Footnote 3 about that small segment of the Internet who believes that all nuclear weapons are a hoax is interesting:

“For those who are curious: The “all nukes are a hoax” theory seems to stem from a couple different sources.The technical argument is that fast neutron chain reactions are impossible, because the fission cross-section of U-235 is small for fast neutrons. The cross-section is indeed small for high-energy neutrons, which is why reactors use a moderator to slow the neutrons downand increase the likelihood of their capture by the small amounts of U-235 in the nuclear fuel. What is weird is that the people making this argument don’t seem to realize that this is exactly why you use 80-90% enriched material in a bomb – it is to overcome this low probability of fissioning by just putting a ridiculous number of targets in the area. It is also why there are tampers, neutron reflectors, and the like, and also why even a relatively sophisticated weapon like the Fat Man only fissioned something like 13-18% of its fissile material, and the Little Boy bomb only fissioned around 1% of its fissile material.

They also have weirdly interpreted the “Hiroshima and Nagasaki are not that different from the firebombing of Tokyo” argument (to a rather absurd conclusion, that it was just a firebombing, despite the fact that firebombing and atomic bombing have really different outcomes), believe that the photographs of the mushroom clouds are all faked (despite the fact that such a level of fakery was really quite beyond the technology of the 1940s – similar to the “Apollo moon hoax,” it would have been easier to make an atomic bomb in the 1940s than to fake an atomic bomb convincingly on film, at least to the degree of documentation that we have on them from the time), and believe that every scientist in the entire world (except for the random engineer who came up with this dumb theory) is in on the secret and has reasons to propagate it indefinitely (and I am apparently in on the hoax as well, to my surprise). …”

It seems Wellerstein has studied this web page, which is the only one on the Internet that mentions in one go that

(A) nuclear fission is always slow and only possible with a moderator or some sort of control to slow down the free neutrons,

(B) Hiroshima/Nagasaki damages are typical Tokyo/Yokohama napalm firebombing damages and

(C) all atomic a-bomb explosion mushroom and FLASH photos are faked, and on another page suggests that

(D) Apollo 11 was a hoax.

Wellerstein thinks it was easier to build an a-bomb in secrecy than to produce the propaganda 1945 and later. Well, I … the random engineer who came up with this dumb theory … do not agree. Wellerstein thinks in e-mail to me 4 February 2015 that all info below is nonsense and a dumb theory by a crank (me)!

Well, I consider Wellerstein not serious. He is just a full-time US propagandist of correct political thinking and part of the gang(s…s). I feel sorry for him wasting his life on it and getting upset of my findings gathered as a hobby.

When above news (sic) of an a-bomb was published by media August 6, 1945, the NYT newspaper and all other editors of America just followed orders from above and didn’t verify, if the information was true. Clearly no NYT or media reporter was present at Hiroshima to verify anything incl. the 20 000 tons of TNT and the ‘vaporized’ steel tower of a test three weeks earlier.

The editors/media just copied/published what they were told, i.e. the propaganda. The readers clearly didn’t suspect it was a hoax.

Of course nobody in the USA had on August 6, 1945 ever heard about an a-bomb, as it was all secret, but everyone was now informed one had been dropped on Japan. OK! It served the yellow monkeys right, we were told. And then the US citizens were told that the bomb or missile was equal to 20,000 tons of TNT or 20 kilotons of TNT (Trinitrotoluene) exploding in a FLASH.

Evidently nobody in the USA had at that time ever heard about or seen a 20 kilotons of TNT (Trinitrotoluene) explosion FLASH or what it was, but now it was planted in the heads of the Americans and from then on all fake a-bomb explosions could be compared with strange kilotons of TNT (Trinitrotoluene) explosions. War was on. Most Americans thought it was good news. Even it was a lie!

Media must of course again – 71 years later – publish the old lie that it was a fantastic invention by very, very intelligent, western scientists and engineers that saved millions of lives, etc, etc, bla, bla.

Only this web site will tell you the truth about the really silly, foolish nuclear, a-bomb nonsense that you have been told about at school and that is regularly repeated by media that was invented and put together by clever but crazy Americans assisted by other, badly paid, western physicists in only three years 1942/5 (the Manhattan project).

The idea was a secret, fear-based super weapon to be developed during WW2 with money supplied by the military to really scare people. Everything must of course be military secret. That’s the key to success.

The bomb would never work (that is the secrecy!), but with propaganda of all kind, you could easily impress friends and foes and cash in on fake a-bomb development projects. Many politicians loved it!

The “a-bombs” were actually invented by science fiction writer H.G Wells already 1913 nearly 30 years before US president Roosevelt started the top-secret Manhattan Project. Wells’ The World Set Free describes cities around the world being devastated by what he called “atomic bombs“. Wells predicted not only the mushroom cloud we associate with a-bombs, but their lasting radiation as well.

“Few who adventured into these areas of destruction and survived attempted any repetition of their experiences. There are stories of puffs of luminous, radio-active vapour drifting sometimes scores of miles from the bomb centre and killing and scorching all they overtook.”

The stupid public should never know that it was a hoax from the start. My family and little I became worried too and were fooled then.

After the fake but successful a-bombings of Japan (people clearly believed they had happened) the crazy but still law abiding physicists got serious and believed their own propaganda lies and started to teach them as truths at universities. Internal criticism was no longer possible. You had to believe or you were not part of the gang(sters).

Killing and bombing poor, unarmed civilians were common practice during WW2 by terrorists on both sides but the allies were in the lead. Nobody cared. A typical US bomber run on a civilian, non-military Japanese town, and there were many, would be made at night, at low altitude and deliver a mixture of high explosive and incendiary bombs. The objective was to turn the closely-packed,wooden homes and buildings prevalent in Japanese cities into raging infernos and ultimately into the most destructive of all weapons – the fire storm. Tokyo on the night of 9-10 March 1945 is a typical example. A force of 334 B-29s was unleashed – each plane stripped of ammunition for its machine guns to allow it to carry more fire/napalm bombs. The lead attackers arrived over the city just after dark and were followed by a procession of death that lasted until dawn. The fires started by the initial raiders could be seen from 150 miles away. The results were devastating: almost 17 square miles of the city were reduced to ashes. Estimates of the number of defenceless civilians, mostly elderly, women and children killed range between 80.000 and 200.000. The young men were evidently not at home but served in the armed forces. The industry was located far away. The military value of the napalm bombing raids against Japanese towns was zero. And probably much fewer people were killed as you could run for shelter in a park or jump into a canal nearby.

General Crawford Sams, one of the six men who ran Japan under MacArthur 1945-1952, believed the a-bomb propaganda but thought the a-bombs themselves were not very effective. He didn’t understand why. He was just ordered to exaggerate everything.

Further down are photos/text from Hiroshima ‘ground zero’ autumn 1945 after the streets had been cleared of debris (Source:http://gigamaster.blogspot.fr/2012/11/infographics-nuclear-explosions.html). It is clear to me that there was no ‘ground zero’ and that no a-bomb exploded here and destroyed buildings, bridges, inhabitants and everything as suggested by US military authorities. It seems that all, one or two storeys wooden/paper buildings housing mostly poor people were simply burnt down by napalm carpet bombing (exactly like Tokyo March and Yokohama May 1945 – a city I know very well) leaving steel bridges and the external walls/roofs of all brick/concrete office buildings intact.

When I arrived at Yokohama May 1972 (!) I wondered about all still damaged, abandoned bank buildings and empty plots between Yamate and Yokohama Stations and was told it was all burnt down by napalm May 1945 … not to be talked about.

It is common knowledge that 1945 central Hiroshima and Nagasaki were 95% wooden/paper one storey houses with simple roofs for accommodation and simple stores/shops and only 5% concrete buildings, banks, insurance companies, trading companies offices, etc. And all had quite bad fire protection. The heavy industry and any military compounds were located outside the city centre.

Aerial view of urban central Hiroshima before fire bombing. Nothing of military value there. Just wood/paper shanty houses
 

Major Alexander P. de Seversky, who 1945 inspected the bombed towns of Japan, testified:

In Hiroshima I was prepared for radically different sights. But, to my surprise, Hiroshima looked exactly like all the other burned-out cities in Japan.There was a familiar pink blot, about two miles in diameter. It was dotted with charred trees and telephone poles. Only one of the cities twenty bridges was down. Hiroshima’s clusters of modern buildings in the downtown section stood upright.

It was obvious that the blast could not have been so powerful as we had been led to believe. It was extensive blast rather than intensive.

I had heard of buildings instantly consumed by unprecedented heat. Yet here I saw the buildings structurally intact, and what is more, topped by undamaged flag poles, lightning rods, painted railings, air raid precaution signs and other comparatively fragile objects.

At the T-bridge, the aiming point for the atomic bomb, I looked for the “bald spot” where everything presumably had been vaporized in the twinkling of an eye. It wasn’t there or anywhere else. I could find no traces of unusual phenomena.

What I did see was in substance a replica of Yokohama or Osaka, or the Tokyo suburbs – the familiar residue of an area of wood and brick houses razed by uncontrollable fire. Everywhere I saw the trunks of charred and leafless trees, burned and unburned chunks of wood. The fire had been intense enough to bend and twist steel girders and to melt glass until it ran like lava – just as in other Japanese cities.

The concrete buildings nearest to the centre of explosion, some only a few blocks from the heart of the atom blast, showed no structural damage. Even cornices, canopies and delicate exterior decorations were intact. Window glass was shattered, of course, but single-panel frames held firm; only window frames of two or more panels were bent and buckled. The blast impact therefore could not have been unusual.

Then I questioned a great many people who were inside such buildings when the bomb exploded. Their descriptions matched the scores of accounts I had heard from people caught in concrete buildings in areas hit by blockbusters. Hiroshima’s ten-story press building, about three blocks from the centre of the explosion, was badly gutted by the fire following the explosion, but otherwise unhurt. The people caught in the building did not suffer any unusual effects.

Professor Alex Wellerstein disagrees with above in an email to me 4 February 2015 and suggests:

The Hiroshima/Nagasaki damages are in fact not typical of napalm damages. They are phenomenologically distinct. There are evidences of high pressure and high thermal flux, to say nothing of induced radioactivity from neutrons, at the atomic bombing sites. Napalm does not produce these kinds of effects. The similarities between the two are mostly superficial — firestorm, for example. But they have drastically different mortality rates (Hiroshima/Nagasaki were 2-4X more deadly per square mile than the Tokyo bombing, and the Tokyo bombing was itself considerably more deadly than any later firebombing, much less firebombings on cities of the size and makeup of Hiroshima and Nagasaki).”

But Wellerstein is probably born around 1980, i.e. 35 years after the events and influenced or brainwashed by US propaganda.

Aerial view of central Hiroshima where the alleged a-bomb is said to have exploded over Rijo Dori street at Kamiya-cho, Naka-ku in the middle producing a blast/heat wave according this propaganda film. The main streets were quickly cleaned of ash and soot after the fires and no bridges were damaged (as they were made of steel/concrete). The flat thin roofs of the concrete/brick office buildings are intact. Only the wood/paper shanty huts making up 95% of central Hiroshima have been burnt down … by carpet napalm bombing. Where the fires stopped, intact housing could be found. Many people jumped into the river to survive the fires

Professor Wellerstein thinks the photo above shows typical a-bomb damages. Of course he is supported by Mr. Dwight D. Eisenhower, President of the United States of America and promoted by IAEA suggesting to the 470th Plenary Meeting of the United Nations General Assembly, Tuesday, 8 December 1953, 2:45 p.m. that:

“On 16 July 1945, the United States set off the world’s biggest atomic explosion. Since that date in 1945, the United States of America has conducted forty-two test explosions. Atomic bombs are more than twenty-five times as powerful as the weapons with which the atomic age dawned, while hydrogen weapons are in the ranges of millions of tons of TNT equivalent.”

Bla, bla! Actually, the whole speech is outrageous, very cruel, shameless, immoral, crazy, pure propaganda … but nobody at the time objected. It is one reason why the magic lies are 2016 still promoted as politically correct TRUTHS.

The hydrogen weapon – the h-bomb – is just an a-bomb in a box full of hydrogen isotopes (hydrogen atoms – deuterium and tritium – carrying one and two extra neutrons) in the shape of bits of solid metal, Hydrogen compounds, where the Hydrogen atom is replaced by its isotope. When an a-bomb explodes only 1.5 to 2% of the Uranium or Plutonium atoms fission, while neutrons fly away, we are told, and described below. In an h-bomb the exploding a-bomb liberates the extra neutrons of the Hydrogen isotopes that fission the remaining 98.5 to 98% of the Uranium or plutonium atoms in the a-bomb making it >50 times stronger, bla, bla. No nuclear fusion takes place of any kind, even if experts confusingly suggests the opposite:

The presumable (sic – it is secret!) structure of an h-bomb is as follows: at its center is an atomic bomb; surrounding it is a layer of lithium deuteride (a compound of lithium and deuterium, the isotope of Hydrogen with mass number 2); around it is a tamper, a thick outer layer, frequently of fissionable material, that holds the contents together in order to obtain a larger explosion. Neutrons from the atomic explosion cause the lithium to fission into helium, tritium (the isotope of hydrogen with mass number 3), and energy. The atomic explosion also supplies the temperatures needed for the subsequent fusion of deuterium with tritium, and of tritium with tritium (50,000,000°C and 400,000,000°C, respectively). Enough neutrons are produced in the fusion reactions to produce further fission in the core and to initiate fission in the tamper.

Imagine 400 000 000°C temperature. During some nano-seconds! Why Hydrogen isotopes fuse is not really clear, as usual. Only extra neutrons of the Hydrogen atoms of the metal compound are released to fission the Uranium or plutonium atoms of the a-bomb. But as every a-bomb does not work, all h-bombs likewise are clever, pseudoscientific propaganda. The magic h-bomb is so strong, it cannot be dropped by a plane – the plane will be destroyed Kamikaze style at the explosion – so USA suggest it arrives by ICBMs – Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles – at a speed >7;000 m/s but … it is nonsense as described below and here.

A recent March 24, 2014, example is: “Obama reportedly plays ‘nuclear war game’ with world leaders at summit”. Obama“Yes, our President is a con artist, and yes, nearly every reporter who writes about him participates in this set of lies, because of careerism, social financial reasons, or a simple lack of competence or imagination” – apparently loves a-bombs vaporizing children and invites people to play nuke games with him! Obama’s mother was a WASP – White, Anglo Saxon Protestant – and Obama’s father was an upper-class, light skinned Kenyan (East Africa) student, so Obama, brought up on Hawaii by his WASP grand-parents working for the CIA and sent to Harvard, is 0% Afro-American, i.e. originating from West African slaves brought to America 1600-1800 and never given a chance to learn to read and write!

[FOX NEWS CAPTION]: ” President of European Union Council Herman Van Rompuy, Canada’s Prime Minister Stephen Harper, France’s President Francois Hollande, Britain’s Prime Minister David Cameron, U.S. President Barack Obama, Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel, Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, China’s President Xi Jinping (??? – actually the Italian Prime Minister) and EU Commission President Jose Manuel Barosso (L-R, clockwise) meet during the Nuclear Security Summit in The Hague on March 24, 2014.REUTERS/POOL”
Many people incl. the nine politicians/clowns playing nuke games in above stupid photo apparently believe a-bombs, created by evil magicians since 1942 or so, work and can be used by terrorists and the reason is that they are manipulated to believe so by equally mad a-bomb and terrorist supporters of USA, USSR (Russia), Great Britain and France backed up by mainstream media. Why the European Union, Canada, Germany, Italy and Japan participate in the Obama madness is easy to grasp. You have to be politically correct and corrupt. Angela Merkel apparently has a PhD in physics and should know better but then she was also an FDJ-member and learnt to lie and cheat as a young woman.

So: I do now understand how any unintelligent, uncivilized human being 2016 can support a-bombs and nuclear war games.

Reason is that all a-bombs are just propaganda. They do not work. No a-bombs were ever dropped on Japan 1945. It was justpropaganda. Like the French announcements that >500 French brave résistance fighter wiped out some Nazi-German regiments on the Glières plateau at Haute Savoie, April 1944. Actually the battle trained Nazis killed >150 French and lost 5 own soldiers April 26, 1944, and the French were totally defeated at Haute Savoie, etc. The final victors always write the history though – true or false – whatever happened.

An a-bomb (1945) consisted allegedly of only 61 kg of Uranium 235.

61 kg is the critical mass (the link is a laugh) – ridiculously or unscientifically defined as a small volume of about 3 liters of solid, heavy Uranium 235 metal rings52 kg if a sphere – that can be carried in a bag – see below. When the outer rings circle the inner rings and press against each other, their combined mass becomes critical and a single, free neutron can start splitting one atom, releasing energy and releasing more neutrons splitting more atoms at the speed of light causing an explosion of released energy. It is evidently a joke!.

The a-bomb was dropped from an airplane and, triggered by mechanical contact/compression in fast, vertical flight, was transformed into pure energy (no combustion at all – just nuclear fast fission – and Uranium 235 (Hiroshima) or Plutonium (Nagasaki) atoms splitting into smaller atoms while releasing energy and more free neutrons producing during some nano-seconds, because that is the time for 2% or 100% of the 61 kg of Uranium 235 atoms to fission and producing in the atmosphere air first a white FLASH(lasting several seconds of extremely bright light travelling at the speed of light 299.792.458 m/s blinding any viewers/the enemy but not producing any shadows on films of such events), then a deadly SHOCK WAVE full of radioactive particles/split atoms felt as a noisy air/blast pressure increase >1 000 bar moving at supersonic velocity say >100.000 m/s into the stationary atmosphere, ahead of a fireball (see below) of the released energy, that blows away the viewers/enemies and destroys everything but also shakes the ground like an earth quake with noise travelling at only 330 m/s in air, followed by a terrible FIREBALL with HEAT (very high temperature >1 000 000° K) expanding at say only 10.000 m/s velocity into the surrounding cold air vaporizing viewers/enemies, unless they were blown away by the initial shock wave, heating up the air, so it glows and the ground below that it melts and starting fires, with nasty RADIATION (invisible electromagnetic microwaves frying the body cells of the non-vaporized viewers/enemies still alive further away) and RADIOACTIVE PARTICLES i.e, the radioactive remains of the original Uranium of Plutonium mixing with the ground soil and dust that people can inhale and a little later a dirty, hot, full of various gases and the radioactive particles MUSHROOM CLOUD of different colours (black?) rising slowly up 20 000 meters from the vaporized Ground Zero that can be photographed (photo shopped/Technicolor) to frighten the viewers/enemies.

The cloud is full of thousands of tons of radioactive particles that are carried up miles above the earth. These radioactive particles then fall out of the mushroom cloud, or out of the dispersing cloud of particles blown by the winds thus becoming FALLOUT that gives off invisible, gamma ray radiation killing people still alive inhaling them, and finally, sometimes, a CRATER (a hole in the ground below the explosion, where you can bury the enemy).

That’s all!

All pure energy becomes within nano-seconds FLASH light, then high pressure, noisy SHOCK WAVE and high temperature HEAT with invisible electromagnetic RADIATION in the shape of a FIREBALL. And later a dirty MUSHROOM CLOUD consisting of hot dirty smoke in cold, clean air that nobody understands what it is and where it comes from but full of RADIOACTIVE PARTICLES and FALLOUT. And sometimes a CRATER at Ground Zero. If you do not die at once by the flash, shock wave, heat, radiation and fireball, you will no doubt die by inhaling the fall out later. Unless you dropped below a table with a wet towel around your nose and mouth.

Nonsense of course.

There is no scientific, peer reviewed evidence that above can happen. All is military, national security top secrets approved by nuclear experts. However, uncontrolled fission of atoms just produces heat that boils or melts the surrounding that prevents further fission. Nuclear power plants have suffered it. Any a-bomb would just melt before exploding.

All films of alleged atomic bomb explosions I have seen do not always show the white FLASH. We only see a lot of smoke/dark hot air (?) formed and later a dirty MUSHROOM CLOUD slowly rising in the sky. Sometimes there is a CRATER. I have never seen a film or photo showing the vaporized results of the enormous high temperature HEAT. Only normal fire damages, if any at all. Or seen, heard the noise later or felt the results of the high pressure SHOCK WAVE at different speeds in air and ground. Just structural deformations due to fire and gravity forces. And I have never seen any plants, trees or animals damaged by evil electromagnetic RADIATION, only photos of burnt humans and animals. Actually most footage of a-bomb explosions are very low quality and appear 100% fake. The explosions seem to be simple, relatively slow detonations driven by chemical reactions occurring behind the shock wave front producing the dirty smoke mushroom cloud. Such a slow detonation cannot be the superfast release of pure energy lasting nano-seconds of an a-bomb.

That’s why I conclude, apart from real, physical evidence, that the a-bomb is simply a hoax to keep us in fear.

Professor Wellerstein has another opinion (in email to me 4 February 2015) what happens, when an a-bomb explodes, e.g. in the middle of a desert where nothing can burn (Trinity), and produces a fireball and mushroom cloud and the footage of it:

“As for how to photograph a nuclear explosion, please just read some of the basic literature on fireball and cloud formation. It is not“pure energy” — the energy that is released comes primarily from kinetic repulsion of fission fragments and secondary radiations. Much of this initial energy is absorbed into the atmosphere surrounding the fireball (which is the cause of the “double flash” phenomena, because it briefly renders it opaque to visible radiation). All matter at the centre of the fireball is converted into an intensely heated gas. This is the fireball that rises, eventually forming the familiar “mushroom” shape because of Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities as it passes through the atmosphere, its surface cooling and becoming more “cloud-like.” As it meets resistance it begins to flatten. The heat of the initial fireball (which is a result of the explosive yield) determines both how fast it rises and how high it eventually rises, and the resistance it encounters along way (say, from the troposphere), causes it to flatten even more dramatically. What I find bizarre is that you clearly believe it is possible for TNT to do this sort of thing (which it can, on a smaller scale), but somehow you accord nuclear energy a magical, “pure energy” quality that would somehow make it exempt from this rather basic behaviour.”

Hm, the matter at the centre of the fireball can only be split uranium/plutonium atoms and neutrons and they cannot be converted into a gas. Then there is the energy/heat and it will, if it is released, heat up the air. But a fireball? What is burning? The air?

I have evidently never seen 15 000 tons of TNT explode in a FLASH, so I have no opinion about making photos of it. All comparisons of a-bombs with TNT explosions are just propaganda. Not pure energy? What happens inside a nuclear power plant unless it is pure energy? It is not magic. The uranium atoms of the yellow cake fuel rods become other, smaller atoms but there are no explosions; the uranium atoms just split into two by moderated neutrons. And please, the gas that is intensely heated by thematter – what remains of the 61 kg Uranium 235 – is simple air (79% N2, 21% O2 and some other gases). Air or water does not get dirty, when you heat it. In a power plant the medium is water getting warm without Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities, blah, blah.

If the a-bomb energy release takes place below water at limited depth below the surface in an enclosed atoll of limited depth, you would also expect a FLASH, release of heat and a shock wave. The light travels a little slower in water but should be seen. The heat would boil the water into steam and the shock wave applied to the water should create a circular tsunami wave pushing the water aside at high speed virtually emptying the atoll. But it was not seen at the Baker 24 July 1946 alleged underwater atomic 21.000 ton TNT equivalent bomb explosion. The alleged bomb was located at about 27 meter depth in the average 60 meter deep atoll. When the bomb exploded film show no FLASH but hot water or steam being pushed straight up like the stem of a mushroom.Mushroom! Popular but not realistic. You would expect that the energy released would heat up the water above boiling point and create steam being dissipated in all directions, e.g. straight up, straight down against the bottom and bounce up and to the sides pushing the sea water ahead of it creating a great wave emptying the atoll and making room for air to fill the void sucked in from above. The energy applied mechanically to the water itself as a shock wave would also produce a circular wave emptying the atoll, etc. Whatever was shown on the films cannot possibly be that of an underwater explosion. I suspect that the whole thing was simple propaganda, e.g. two films – one of the sea below and another of the sky above with a model bomb added – all glued together. A simple trick film!

Prove me wrong about two other hoaxes and earn €1M! I am serious.

The a-bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were thus just propaganda 1945 to end WW2 in Japan and impress the USSR. Fooled the world then as there was no free press around. Only censorship. To keep the hoax going two a-bomb museums were quickly built at Hiroshima and Nagasaki for school children to be fooled by. Another a-bomb museum is at Albuquerque, New Mexico, USApaid for by the US government that started the hoax and keeps it going.

Comments are always welcome at anders.bjorkman@wanadoo.fr.

Imagine all fake a-bombs being built by fake industries and the money laundered by the criminals involved since 1945. I got involved in this strange business not until 1994:

28 September 1994 a ferry – M/S Estonia – sank in the Baltic Sea and >850 persons drowned including >500 Swedes. Immediately the authorities announced, assisted by media, that enormous wave impact forces >1.000 tons had knocked off a heavy bow visor that ripped open a steel ramp protecting the weather tight superstructure. It resulted in the superstructure being loaded with water and that the ship quickly sank. An official investigation later confirmed it and that it was a stupid accident. Operating similar ships I quickly established that the official story was an invention. Wave impacts produce noise and vibrations and are noticed, so you slow down. Water loaded in the superstructure only produces heeling and capsize and floating upside down on the buoyancy of an intact hull. My findings were not popular and the governments and their authorities started a campaign – supported by media – branding me as an unreasonable, unscientific conspiracy theorist. And there we are today. Evidently I am not a conspiracy theorist. I am a serious engineer. The ship was used to carry arms and was sunk due to sabotage. Shit happens.


Or as
Brabantian” writes:

Tianjin mushroom cloud points to Swedish engineer Anders Björkman‘s detailed argument that no nuclear bombs have ever exploded or existed:(a) Mushroom cloud pics videos are chemical explosions, we’re just Pavlov’d to think they’re nuclear

(b) Hiroshima & Nagasaki were typical chemical firestorm sites like Tokyo, Dresden, Hamburg; ‘ground zero’ brick concrete steel stayed up, even their flagpoles etc; radioactive junk could have been dropped with chemicals

(c) most Japan houses were wood so burned

(d) Media hides witnesses who saw multiple bombers, etc.

Nuke bomb terror has earned trillions for the cabal since 1945, & since 1960s has been major tool of Israeli terror against Arabs & world, 1967 & 1973 wars, ‘Samson option’ etc. Mordechai Vanunu is possibly fake re Israel’s nukes, he ‘leaked’ to MI5-MI6 London Times, maybe was on Israeli beach & only ‘in prison’ for photos, a faker like Snowden or Assange. We can also see why all 10 alleged ‘nuclear bomb nations’ played along in this scam:

1945 USA chemically bombs Hiroshima & Nagasaki (like Tokyo, Dresden, Hamburg…), also dumping illness-inducing radioactive items. Media, & Japanese witnesses who saw plane fleets, told to shut up. Nuke story sold by adding chemical-blast ‘mushroom clouds’ in film & photos – USA HAS NUCLEAR BOMBS 

1949 Soviet Union accepts deal for Russian elites to get wealthy by playing along with Cold War & global nuclear terror –COMMIE RUSSIA HAS THE BOMB

1952 UK Brits & London financial centre don’t want to feel 2nd class as Anglo empire dominates world – UK HAS THE BOMB

1960 France chafes not to be 2nd class to roast-beef-eating Brits, accepts deal to become nuclear if they pretend to be the ones giving Israel nuclear technology – FRANCE & DE GAULLE HAVE THE BOMB

1964China gets upgraded to major league to help justify escalating military spending – COMMIE CHINA HAS THE BOMB NOW TOO 

1966 Israel gets to join the club as per earlier deal with France, in time to terrorise & intimidate Arabs in 1967 & 1973 wars – JEWS HAVE THE BOMB & JEWS ARE READY TO SAMSON OPTION EVERYBODY, later confirmed by ‘brave whistleblower’ Vanunu to MI6 London Times

1974 India takes deal to stop being so non-aligned & side more with big powers, insulting India’s own heritage by calling their bomb programme ‘Smiling Buddha’ INDIA NOW HAS THE BOMB 

1979South Africa‘s white apartheid government gets to play act in compensation for all their abuse in Western media, but agrees in advance to ‘dismantle’ any bombs before Mandela or any black government can find out the scam … joins with Israel & Taiwan in bomb test WHITE RACIST SOUTH AFRICA HAS THE BOMB READY TO KILL BLACK PEOPLE showing ANYONE CAN GET A BOMB, but ‘bombs’ all taken apart & shipped away before Mandela takes over

1998 Pakistan is central player in new Western anti-Muslim theme & revving up ‘war on terror’, and Pakistan finally gets to upgrade to par with old rival India PAKISTANI MUSLIMS HAVE THE BOMB & OSAMA OR TERRORISTS MIGHT GET AHOLD OF IT, plus Pakistan ‘sells’ bombs to Saudi Arabia for extra bonus

2006 North Korea, always making deals for latest consumer products for ruling family & elite, gets to upgrade to nuclear club CRAZY NORTH KOREA HAS THE BOMB

Whether nuclear bombs are real or not, it sure has been ‘good business’!

The political implications of the a-bomb being a hoax are really not enormous apart from being funny and comical and I cannot understand why media cannot report it. Except that it is forbidden by a US law!

It means only that the USA (presidents Roosevelt/Truman) successfully cheated the world at the end of WW2 with the USSR, UK, France, Israel China, India, Pakistan and North Korea joining in later. Just laugh about it.

The “treason” of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg was probably part of the US show and they were not executed but given new identities.

The Israeli whistleblower Vanunu is also part of the show by “exposing” Israel’s nuclear arms program when no such program exists.

Israel stating that it is concerned about a possible Iranian nuclear bomb is also pure a-bomb showbiz, knowing that no such bomb has ever been and cannot be built.

The Cuban missile crisis of 1962 was also a total fake with both Khrushchev and Kennedy cynically aware that they were engaged in a bogus argument about non-existent a-bombs. They had however just a little earlier decided to start the fake space race with cosmos clown Gagarin 1961 flying around the Earth in less than 120 minutes!

Many people cannot believe how easy it is to fake the whole a-bomb story: just keep the details secret and keep you scared viamedia.

How a secret, non-working super weapon costing $ billions today is compatible with real democracy is beyond my understanding. Of course, the a-bomb was secretly invented during WW2 as a cheap trick by few, young, probably honest people that avoided military service at the front by making up scientific fantasy stories about the a-bomb as part of the propaganda war effort, but you would have expected that they afterwards would have told the truth = it was all a hoax. An a-bomb does not work.

But they couldn’t.

In the USA it is against the law to tell the Truth about the a-bomb and if you do, you shall be punished by death!

The significance of the a-bomb for military purposes is crystal clear according the US Atomic Energy Act of 1946 (Public Law 585, 79th Congress).

That really foolish piece of shit, i.e. the US Atomic Energy Act of 1946, e.g. Sec. 10. (b) Restrictions. (1), (and its revisions) charges the US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), and later the US Department of Energy (DoE), with regulating restricted data wherever it appears and wherever it comes from, i.e. control of information.

In plain language – censorship! The restricted data clauses of the US Atomic Energy Act specifies that all nuclear weapons-related information is to be considered classified unless explicitly declassified, and makes no distinction about whether said information was created in a laboratory by a government scientist or anywhere else in the world by private citizens. Thus nuclear weapons information or propaganda is born secret according to the US law. The US authorities and public don’t have any choice in the matter2016. Therefore all information that a-bombs are fake is effectively censored in the USA. It seems this web page has been overlooked by DoE … and that I, with intent to injure the United States, am in breach with the law Sec. 10. (b) Restrictions. (2) and (3) (but only in the USA) and shall be punished by death! And you the readers are also at risk! You are reading classifiedinformation.

It must be kept secret! And vague!

Though large quantities of vague data have been officially released, and larger quantities of vague data have been unofficially leaked by former bomb designers, most public descriptions of nuclear weapon design details rely to some degree on speculation, reverse engineering from known information, or comparison with similar fields of physics (inertial confinement fusion is the primary example).Source

It worked beautifully in Japan 1945-1953 as Japan was occupied by the USA applying strict, military censorship there, so it was illegal to question the a-bombings 1945. You were arrested, jailed and even executed, if you said the a-bombings of Japan were just propaganda and that there were no evidences they had taken place. When I lived in Japan 1972-1976 I was mystified by it. Of course, USA still had its military bases in Japan then, so I understand that Japan shuts up about the lies from 1945.

And the hoax works today 71 years later by keeping plenty silly, unintelligent and opportunistic people occupied everywhere. It (the a-bomb) is a criminal threat. Terrorists may use them! What a crazy world. A-bombs have always only been used by terrorists. No healthy, sane, intelligent person can consider using an a-bomb.

The threats from nuclear … weapons are real. The possibility that terrorists might acquire and use nuclear weapons is an urgent and potentially catastrophic challenge to global security.

and 

Understanding the Nuclear Weapons Threat – While it has been more than twenty years since the end of the Cold War, the existence of thousands of nuclear weapons continues to pose a serious global threat.

In order to finally remove this global threat and to eliminate the potentially catastrophic challenge to global security I explain below why nuclear weapons like a-bombs created by evil magicians and fools do not work and are fake. Isn’t it good news?

Media are kindly requested to publish the scoop. Mainstream media will clearly not do it due to lack of space. But imagine if five US major TV Channels would explain 6 August 2016 that what happened 71 years earlier in Japan was just propaganda. I would be happy.

But the show goes on and on! Example:

According to data exchanged on October 1, 2014 by Moscow and Washington, Russia has 1,643 deployed strategic warheads, compared with 1,642 for the US. Marginal difference in numbers but Russian land-based strategic forces have an explosive yield that is an order of magnitude greater than anything in the US armoury. Moscow’s primary deterrent weapon is the mighty SS-18, a single one of which can destroy an area the size of New York – the state, not just the city. To get an idea of the destructive power of the SS-18, just look at the nuclear weapon the US used to destroy the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. The Hiroshima bomb was a primitive 15 kiloton warhead and yet it wiped out a city of 70,000 in a few seconds. The SS-18 – code named Satan by NATO – carries 10 warheads, each having a yield of 750 to 1000 kiloton). Some of these missiles carry a single 20,000 kiloton warhead – that’s 1333 times Hiroshima.

Russia has another trump card up its sleeve – its supersonic bomber fleet of Tupolev Tu-160s. These Mach 2 plus aircraft can take off from well-defended airbases located deep in the heart of Russia, fly over the North Pole, launch nuclear-tipped cruise missiles from safe standoff distances over the Atlantic, and return home to watch the destruction on CNN.

That’s assuming CNN will be around. For, the Russian strategic bomber fleet can singlehandedly wipe out every major city in the US.

What terrible nonsense!

The Islamic (dictatorial) Republic of Iran and global powers (right) agreed 3 April 2015 the ‘key parameters‘ of a new fake nuke deal. On that date an agreement was reached to reach an agreement by 30 June 2015.

Iran may continue to plan making a fake a-bomb after that date but with a reduced number of fake centrifuges. It replaces the agreement of 23 November 2013 described below. The US Congress will regardless veto any developments about fake a-bombs 2016.

On 14 July 2015 (two weeks late) a new deal was struck. The fake Iranian a-bomb show just goes on and on. Nobody dares to say a-bombs do not work!

There are 8.420.000 web sites promoting atomic bombs found by Google in 0.19 seconds. It seems these web sites are just stupid propaganda of the worst kind. There are plenty impressive articles on the topic of nuclear weapons but none would ever suggest like I do here; it is all a silly hoax.

I, being a sceptic using critical thinking, do not understand how any intelligent, civilized human being2016 can support a-bombs vaporizing people! Do you?

Global powers agree that Iran may maybe plan to have a fake a-bomb some time


Let’s start with this 1963 foolish, stupid, idiotic, crazy, absolutely useless, evidently US made a-bomb that is still around 2016. I wonder what professor Wellerstein thinks about it? I forgot to ask him! Wouldn’t it be a good idea to carry out a real test of a B61 Silver Bullet a-bomb 2016 in front of the public to prove that it works?

 

1.2 The B61 Silver Bullet a-bomb of 1963 – to be upgraded 2016 by Obama

I live in Europe (Southern France) and today, 2016, it seems USA, 53 years later, protect me with plenty atomic strategic and tacticalB61 Silver Bullet a-bombs created 1963 with fixed tail fins just screwed to the bomb shell (see photos below) and according towww.nrdc.org/nuclear/euro/euro.pdf. It is evidently a joke. The B61 Silver Bullet a-bomb does not work and probably does not exist! And what a stupid name of a bomb. Silver bullet!

The B61 Silver Bullet bombs, if they exists, which I doubt, are stored in well-known places all over Europe, where they apparently can go off at any time … even if they do not work.

 A U.S. Air Force safety review determined in 1997 that there was a risk of accidental nuclear explosion during service ofB61 nuclear bombs in NATO’s protective aircraft shelters. (p.52 of above link)

Nobody in Europe reacted 1997! Imagine US/NATO a-bombs just exploding in store!

There were (September 2015) approximately 180 US B61 a-bombs deployed in Europe at six bases in five NATO countries:Belgium (Kleine Brogel AB), Germany (Buchel AB), Italy (Aviano AB and Ghedi AB), the Netherlands (Volkel AB), and Turkey (Incirlik AB). The security is still not very good.  Terrorists plan to steal them! But don’t worry. The bombs do not work. Or exist.

The B61 Silver Bullet gravity bomb was created in 1963 and was built by the Los Alamos National Laboratory, LANL, Los Alamos, in New Mexico according US propaganda. What a joke! There have never existed any bomb manufacturing plants at Los Alamos.

Los Alamos is a boring town in the mountains 40 minutes by car from Santa Fe, capital of New Mexico, famous for being the place where enriched Uranium U235 was transported in and out of the local a-bomb factory close to schools and parks full of children.

Los Alamos was founded January 1943 and had 10.000 inhabitants 1946 and 12.000 inhabitants 2010. The whole town/laboratory is just propaganda.

LANL is famous for its ridiculous 1950’s Godiva device and nuclear fission in a laboratory.

The radiation source within the Godiva device was a fissile metallic mass (usually highly enriched Uranium U235), about 30 cm in diameter (volume 14 137 cm3 and mass 270 kg). This was located at the top of a two-meters-high metal tower. The burst of radiation was produced when a piston of fissile material was quickly inserted and extracted from a cavity within the larger fissile mass. During the time these two masses were combined, they formed a critical mass and a nuclear chain reaction was briefly sustained.

But LANL and Los Alamos weren’t wiped out. Atomic B61 bomb production engineering began there in 1965, with full production beginning in 1968 following a series of creative development problems. No bombs or Godiva devices ever exploded at Los Alamos. Or anywhere.

Total production of all versions of the B61 Silver Bullet a-bomb was approximately 3.155, of which approximately 1 925 remained in service as of 2002 according US propaganda. Where the other 1 230 bombs are is a MILITARY SECRET due to national security considerations. Maybe they have gone missing or were stolen by locals from Los Alamos? They are a strange lot up there at the end of the road. There exists no evidence that a B61 Silver Bullet a-bomb has ever been tested anywhere.

There are 180 B61 Silver Bullet a-bombs in Europe (file photo) – note the fixed tail fins just attached to the end! It will cost USD one billions to make them controllable for improved accuracy when dropping on the enemy in order to better protect Europe! No bomb works though! Imagine that! The bomb tail fins direct the bomb, while dropping from a warplane – a top secret system! See also below about the new tail fins.

An old B61-7 Silver Bullet a-bomb without tail fins being rolled around by some fat US soldiers (or actors?) at Amarillo, Texas, between other B61 a-bombs. The bomb weighs 320 kg incl. 61 kg of Uranium 235 (critical mass) compared to 4 400 kg incl. 61 kg of metal Uranium 235 (critical mass) rings of the Hiroshima bomb 1945.

A B61 Mod 11 weighs 540 kg for unknown reasons. Any B61, with or without tail fins, doesn’t work, though! Imagine that! Where the parachute retarder is located is unclear but probably below the tail fins aft. The B61 Mod 12is available 2014. Only fools believe it works.

 

2012 there seemed to be only 400 B61s left:

 “The B61 is about to undergo a major overhaul that the Pentagon estimates will cost up to $10 billion or $25 million per bomb”.

NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

The U.S. intends to refurbish the remaining 400 B61 a-bombs under its Life Extension Program with the intention that the weapons should remain operational until at least 2025:

“According to newly published figures, the United States will (2013) set aside more than US$ 10 billion for a life extension program for the B61 Silver Bullet a-bombs and another USD one billion for adding controllable tail fins.The plan to give new tail fins to nearly 200 B61 gravity bombs stored in Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Italy andTurkey would give them new mission and new capabilities. The bombs could be delivered by stealth F35 fighter-bombers.”

This screw on B61 original fix tail fin from 1968 shall 2016 be replaced by an improved version at cost $25 million/bomb
Evidently the extremely expensive B61 Silver Bullet tactical a-bomb does neither exist nor work at all, as explained below. Nobody can say on whom the high cost tactical a-bomb shall be dropped by a plane, Hiroshima gravity style. National security! Isn’t it stupid? The cigar shaped Silver bullet 1960’s design is aerodynamically stupid; the tail fins are located in the turbulent area of the narrow end and will never be effective. The bomb is accurately dropped from a US stealth F35 fighter-bomber on the enemy target (we shall believe) but at what speed and at what altitude is not clear?

That the $1B tail fins control system knows where the enemy target is while the bomb is dropping, is of course 100% obviously stupid propaganda created by US military idiots.

Not even the F35 pilots can believe the rubbish.

 

1.3 A-bomb with parachute retarder

Most versions of the old B61 Silver Bullet are equipped with a parachute retarder (currently a 24-ft (7.3 m) diameter nylon/Kevlar chute) to slow the weapon in its descent from release altitude.

This offers the aircraft a chance to escape the blast, or allows the weapon to survive impact with the ground in lay down mode … we are told.

The parachute retarder shall now, 2016, be removed and replaced by a new $25 million intelligent tail fins assembly. The intelligent tail fins shall increase the accuracy of the bomb!

How US$ 10 billion controllable tail fins without a parachute retarder work on a B61 Silver Bullet a-bomb is a MILITARY NATIONAL SECRET … but improvements, increased accuracy, is on its way …

 

1.4 Increased accuracy of US a-bombs after 50 years service by Obama

The new B61 tail fins are shorter and the whole $25 million assembly is screwed on to the end of the bomb

Ms Madelyn R. Creedon, the US assistant secretary of atomic war for global strategic affairs (whatever that can be? – propaganda?) suggested October 30, 2013 that:

 

Mad Ms Madelyn R. Creedonasking Congress for $10 billion to upgrade non-working scrap and plenty 1960’s electronics

 “a key component of the life extension program is the replacement of an expensive parachute system with a newly designed tail assembly, which will increase the B61’saccuracy. And with increased accuracy comes the ability to decrease the weapon’s yield without reducing its capabilities”.

It is good, creative news = standard propaganda lies. The parachute is replaced by a new tail! Finally after only 50 years in service the B61 Model 12 a-bomb can be dropped accurately. But on what? It cannot be said. National security! This very creative 27 minutes film describes allsecrets of the B61 bomb! At 11.26 in the movie a bomb is accurately dropped in the lay down mode by a fighter bomber. Admire all 1960’s electronics that do not need replacement 2016. It is a good laugh.

I have tried to contact Madelyn at US DoD for more details about the B61 improvements – who will design, manufacture and test the new tail fins and can I attend a real atomic explosion test of a B61, etc., but Madelyn has no telephone or email. I think she is an actress just playing a role. I have only reached Madelyn’s a-bomb secretary Ms. Cynthia O. Smith atcynthia.o.smith.civ@mail.mil, who kindly advised that

Anders,Unfortunately, you’ll need to go through me (Cynthia O. Smith) to get to her (Madelyn R. Creedon).

You can send me your email and I will forward it to her or you can send a snail mail letter.

Many thanks


I have evidently sent my email to Madelyn via Cynthia but then I get no answers from US DoD via her. Try yourself! Madelynapparently relies on snail mail. Someone told me (13 December 2013) to send my questions to:

Ms. Madelyn R. Creedon, Assistant Secretary of atomic War for Global Strategic Affairs2900 War Pentagon, Rm. 3C852A, Washington, DC 20301-2900, USA

Of course I have done that … no reply! Imagine old, haggard Madelyn upgrading a-bombs! Why can’t USA use some good looking lady, e.g. Paris Hilton?

“The new tail kit assembly (seen on photo right) is important because it adds a guidance system to the bomb, basically converting it from a gravity-dependent dumb bomb into a smart one that can be aimed more precisely at a target”,

the Albuquerque Journal reported 18 May 2014. Imagine that for 50 years US had dumb a-bombs without guidance system.

B61 a-bomb with new US$ 25 million tail kit (without parachute retarder) at wind tunnel test. What a stupid joke! Can anybody believe the new tail fins can guide anything?


Madelyn R. Creedon, of Indiana, was confirmed on 07/23/2014 to be Principal Deputy Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration, NNSA, Department of Energy after Neile L. Miller, resigned. What a Principal Deputy Administrator does is not known.
Madelyn seems to be involved with ‘dynamic experiments with special nuclear material and other weapon materials’.NNSA is evidently busy with Madelyn’s pet the B61 Silver Bullet a-bomb and other Life Extension Program (LEP):

NNSA completed important tests for the B61-12 Life Extension Program (LEP). The B61 is a gravity bomb associated with the Air Force long-range bomber and dual-capable fighter aircraft. In coordination with the Air Force, Vibration Fly Around/Instrumented Measurement Vehicle (VFA/IMV) tests of the B61-12 were conducted on F-15, F-16 and B-2 aircraft. In addition, the first full-scale wind tunnel test of the B61-12 was conducted. All of these engineering development tests were successful and provided critical data for use in the B61-12 LEP.

and

NNSA reached the halfway point in the production phase of the W76-1 warhead Life Extension Program (LEP) this fall. This achievement underscored NNSA’s commitment to meeting the U.S. Navy’s requirements for W76-1 production. The primary purpose of the W76-1 is to extend the original warhead service life from 20 to 60 years.

Life Extension Programs (LEP) are major parts of the a-bomb hoax. Imagine extending something’s service life from 20 to 60 years. But if it were built 1965 shouldn’t it be from 50 to 60 years? Of course not! The B61 Silver Bullet a-bomb does not exist. It is 100% propaganda.

 

1.5 The B61-12 Silver Bullet a-bomb will vaporize the plane dropping it – does Obama know?

If the B61 bomb is dropped by gravity from 50 meters altitude by a US war plane on the enemy target, it will hit ground with avertical velocity of 31.34 m/s after only 3.19 seconds (ignoring friction/turbulence that slows down the bomb a little). There is no engine driving the B61. Only its momentum, when released from the plane, drives the bomb when it drops down by gravity.

If the plane + bomb have a horizontal velocity of 100 m/s, the plane will proceed 319 meters, while the bomb is dropping vertically50 meters while also moving forward at same speed. US$ 1 billion controllable tail fins (+ US$ 10 billion general upgrade) may of course divert the B61 bomb accurately sideways (and downwards – not upwards because it will then collide with the plane) a little during the vertical drop but during a maximum 319 meters path. After that the a-bomb hits the ground at great velocity, say, 104.78 m/s at angle 17.4° … and maybe bounces upwards. If the a-bomb then explodes, when hitting ground, the plane + pilot above will evidently be vaporized like the children at Hiroshima, as the a-bomb fire ball and blast/heat wave extends >300 meters within 0.01 seconds! It should have been much better to fit the B61 with a rocket engine – like on, e.g. an AIM-54 Phoenix missile.

It seems US Department of War and Ms. Madelyn R. Creedon are fucking up, again. Luckily the gravity a-bomb does not work, though, as described below. And there are no planes that can drop the 2016 model B61-12 atomic gravity bomb:

Initially the old NATO F-16A/B and Tornado PA-200 aircraft that currently serve in the nuclear strike mission will not be able to make use of the increased accuracy of the B61-12, according to U.S. Air Force officials. The reason is that the aircraft computers are not capable of “talking to” the new digital bomb. As a result, the guided tail kit on the B61-12 forBelgian, Dutch, German, Italian and Turkish F-16s and Tornados will initially be “locked” as a “dumb” bomb. Once these countries transition to the F-35 aircraft, however, the enhanced targeting capability will become operational also in these countries.

Others believe the B61-12 is fantastic. And very dangerous.

Of course there are plenty US intercontinental ballistic a-bomb missiles too controlled by drunken generals like Michael Carey. It is OK. They do not work either.

The US public evidently does not care about costs – US$ 11 billion for life extension and tail fins improvements for better accuracy of something built in the 1960’s that doesn’t work is of no concern to the US public. US$ 11 billion keeps a lot of idle US military busy though planning … what … terrorism … controllable tail fins? It would cost only US$ 1 000:- to dismantle a B61 Silver Bulletand ship it back to USA but it seems US national security will suffer. But, blah, blah, blah:

“We’ve worked with CAPE to study how we meet the requirements for the B61 while ensuring that we’re being responsible stewards of taxpayer dollars. We’re currently doing the required engineering and design work on the B61 which will allow us to make key decisions that we can then use to inform a well researched and validated cost baseline. All of the information we’ve gathered, including the CAPE study, will help us check any final conclusions against a long list of variables so that we’re certain we have a cost baseline that is as accurate as possible.”Josh McConaha, National Nuclear Security Administration (4 Nov. 2012)

Popular media has not caught on, at all! They love to promote created, non-working, non-existing a-bombs and national security and do not understand that they are fooled (or paid) by the military and mad Ms Madelyn R. Creedon. Madelyn does not like my 80 kg a-bomb carried in a bag!

As Paul Craig Roberts says:

National security is where the executive branch hides its crimes against law, both domestic and international, its crimes against the Constitution, its crimes against innocent citizens both at home and abroad and its secret agendas that it knows that the American public would never support.“National security” is the cloak that the executive branch uses to make certain that the US government is unaccountable.

Without accountable government there is no civil liberty and no democracy except for the sham voting that existed in the Soviet Union and now exists in the US.”

 

1.6 The US war on terror 2014 – lost by Obama

USA was November 2013 having great problems with its war on terror! Forbes reported that one million US soldiers have been injured in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars at tremendous costs … and little has been won. RT reported that the cost of keeping each US soldier and there are plenty in Afghanistan has risen from $1.3 million per soldier to $2.1 million per soldier … and that the war is lost. Matthew J. Nasuti reports in the Kabul Press that it costs US taxpayers $50 million to kill one Taliban soldier. That means it will cost $1 billion to kill 20 Taliban fighters. Of course that cost is included in the cost of keeping US soldiers in Afghanistan. 2014 did not look bright. The US war in Afghanistan was lost 2014. And Obama didn’t use his a-bombs … because they never worked.

Please, study below, really good news about the US military atomic nuclear madelyness.

 

1.7 Manne Siegbahn, 1924 Nobel prize (physics) winner

Manne Siegbahn, 1924 Nobel prize (physics) winner and close friend of my grandfather was 1945 asked to become head of the Swedish military research agency, FOA, to, i.a., develop a Swedish atomic bomb. Siegbahn suggested that, if all scientificresearch of FOA immediately became public and subject to independent peer review, he would consider the offer. The Swedish social democratic government did not like that at all. So Manne continued doing peaceful physics research with his cyclotron instead but didn’t really recommend physics or working as a physicist as a career (mostly low paid teacher jobs). So I became a naval architect instead 1965-1969. Thanks, Manne, for your advice! Another Nobel prize (physics) winner, Niels Bohr, was also a friend of my grandfather and stayed in his home in 1942 before being flown off to USA and the Manhattan project. I assume Siegbahn and Bohr met 1945 (at my grandfather’s place?) and that Bohr confided that the a-bomb was just a joke. Bohr could never really explain how an atom fissioned … even if it did.

Of course there are twirps suggesting something like:

7.4.6 SwedenDuring the 50s and 60s Sweden developed considerable nuclear expertise – developing reactor technology and building nuclear power plants. Sweden seriously investigated nuclear weapons from the mid 1950s into the 1960s. A very substantial research effort into the fundamental technical issues of weapon design and manufacture was conducted.By the mid-1960s this effort had supplied sufficient knowledge to allow Sweden to begin immediate manufacture of fairly sophisticated fission weapons. Faced with this decision, Sweden decided not to pursue a weapon production program.

You wonder what silly fools write this nonsense. It apparently took USA three years and 500 000 workers to build a few a-bombs 1942-45 at enormous cost in secrecy and here little Sweden could 1965 do it with 500 workers at much less cost in a very short time. Sweden just found that fission weapons do not work. But it had to remain secret. If you leaked the good news you … got serious problems. To be politically correct and NEUTRAL you cannot say that the SUPERPOWERS and little France play stupid games.

If anybody can find a public, Swedish or any country scientific, peer reviewed paper 1945-2016 that and/or how an a-bomb works, pls tell me. I have not found any. It is all secret!

You wonder what universities or institutes of technology teach young people to become a-bomb engineers. Any ideas? One answer is the Swedish Royal Institute of Technology, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, Stockholm, Sweden and its F-department. I had the possibility to study there 1965 but found the department full of crazy fools wanting to become nuclear bomb and space ship designers. So I went to the S-department at Chalmers Institute of Technology, Chalmers Tekniska Högskola, Gothenburg studying naval architecture instead. Much more fun.

Imagine your job is design and manufacture a military bomb that – a single problem – can only kill old people and children and destroy their poor homes … and you do it. Evidently you are mentally sick, unstable and crazy. Like William L. Laurence:

It is a thing of beauty to behold, this “gadget.” In its design went millions of man-hours of what is without a doubt the most concentrated intellectual effort in history. Never before had so much brain-power been focused on a single problem.William L. Laurence 1945

If you wonder who Bill Laurence was, don’t worry. He was just a journalist producing lies all his life. Typical media!

This also includes 2015 e.g. hysterical Physics Forums:

Physics Forums values quality, civil and productive scientific discussion. We welcome all who believe in these values except Anders Björkman. If anybody links to Anders Björkman’s web page “The atomic bomb hoax 1945-2016″at Physics Forums, then that person is banned for life at Physics Forums that believes in working a-bombs and rules that the subject cannot be discussed at Physics Forums for obvious reasons! On the other hand the fake Higg’s particle can be discussed at Physics Forums.

The People’s Republic of China, PRC, has joined the above group of crazy, mad fools. The PRC submarine fleet is reportedly the world’s second-largest, with about 70 vessels. About 10 are nuclear-powered, and four or more of those are nuclear powered ballistic submarines capable of launching missiles with atomic warheads. I am happy to report that none of the atomic warheads works.

All military or civilian a-bomb supporters are twirps or contemptible persons in my opinion. Religion is said to make good people do evil things. To make intelligent people create stupid things, it takes a-bomb development, engineering and manufacture protected by military and national security … and good salaries. All paid for by tax payers. One result is Albuquerque, NM, a dump in the New Mexico desert and capital of the useless a-bomb.

 

1.8 How to be politically correct – support a-bombs or h-bombs vaporizing children

6 August 2016, the working a-bomb illusion was only 71 years old. What started as a simple propaganda gimmick to finish WW2 in Japan is still believed by billions of people 2016. Evidently there exist plenty a- or h-bombs. But none works. But to be politically correct anywhere you have to agree that the a-bomb works. So you can protest against it.

I am evidently not politically correct. I don’t like to lie, cheat and be dishonest that you have to do to be politically correct.

An a-bomb does not work because a nuclear, exponential chain reaction of Uranium 235, U235, resulting in sudden release of pure energy is not possible and against the Laws of Nature. I explain why below.


There were 61 kg (critical mass of a slab of Uranium 235, U235, metal) or about 4×1026 or 400.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000 Uranium-235 (U235) atoms, we were told, in the very heavy 4.400 (!) kg Hiroshima a-bomb 1945 (equivalent to 15 kilo ton of TNT), i.e. only 1.4% of the a-bomb was material that could explode.

Björkman’s a-bomb
Only 1.5% of the 1.4% or 6×1024 or 600.000.000.000.000.000.000.000 U235 atoms thus actually fissioned or split releasing energy (equivalent to 15.000 ton of TNT exploding), when the bomb allegedly exploded and released pure energy (and not gas of burnt TNT). Read below of further details of the very, very heavy, US a-bomb with only 61 kg U235 inside and how it allegedly exploded 6 August 1945 and killed mostly civilians and children and destroyed little of military value. Every time an Uranium-235 (U235) atom fissions, there is a small FIREBALL. So when an a-bomb explodes there are 6×1024FIREBALLS making one big FIREBALL.

Admire also my total weight only 80 kg Björkman’s a-bomb (left) that can be hidden in a bag to fool US Department of Homeland Security & Co. I describe it in detail below. You only need 61 kg of U235 to destroy Hiroshima and it is easily accomplished in the bag left. Will it work? Evidently not.

It is suggested that total 600 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 U235 atoms in the 1945 US created bomb during some nano-seconds split exponentially 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64,128 (or 1, 3, 9, 27, 81, 243 …) … ~300 000 000 000 000 000 000 000, ~600 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 U235 atoms into ~1 200 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 other, smaller atoms (fractions) by free, evil neutrons flying around at 3% of the speed of light and in the process released pure energy producing 6×1024 FIREBALLS making one big FIREBALLkilling children and others and destroying all houses at Hiroshima except some – see below. And that the fast free neutrons missed 98.5% of the U235 atoms leaving 394.000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 U235 atoms in the bomb not fissioned. All is fantasy!The above fantasy can be tested in a laboratory!

On 18 April 1952, due to a miscalculation, Jemima was assembled with too many disks; this caused an excursion of 1.5 x 1016 fissions …

Prof. Hellman of Stanford University also explains the above in a recent hand-out for his a-bomb design students but it is just more stupid nonsense to keep his bosses quiet. More nonsense is the neutron mirror! In order to reduce the number of free neutrons flying away missing the action we are told that latest a-bombs are fitted with a mirror (!) around the critical mass of Uranium or Plutonium that reflects the neutrons back into action. With such a neutron mirror you can also reduce the critical mass, it is suggested. But it is all nonsense.

Professor Wellerstein evidently suggests otherwise. It was because “you use 80-90% enriched material in a bomb” actually 100%, that it exploded without moderation. Forget all nonsense about critical mass etc. Any amount of enriched material will explode i.e. produce FIREBALLS exponentially during nano-seconds by fission without moderation. According Wellerstein in an e-mail to me 4 February 2015:

“There is adequate evidence (sic) that fast nuclear fission is possible in enriched materials. This has been subjected to experimental testing repeatedly, and there are even reactors that operate on the principle. I stand my notion that (your) theory is “dumb” — the reasoning is reflective of a lack of understanding of the principle of fast fission nuclear chain reactions, to say the least the preposterous notion that all scientists in the world have either been complete dupes on this very elementary issue (all in tandem) or have been fools. The “conspiracy” is untenable on first principles alone — Occam’s razor goes against it. This is aside from the silliness of the notion that all evidence (millions of pages of reports and experiments from tens of thousands of independent investigators in dozens of countries) on the history and legacy of nuclear testing has been falsified.”

All scientists in the world? Only a small handful military scientists design a-bombs in secrecy! Wellerstein carefully avoids referring to the dumb exponential chain reaction of a critical mass causing an atomic explosion during nano-seconds theory, and talks about fast nuclear fission in enriched materials, which is something completely different. There is no such thing as fast fission nuclear chain reaction” or an exponential chain reaction causing an explosion. Evidently I do not suggest that all scientists in the world are dupes or fools and part of a conspiracy. Why would I do that? Lack of understanding? We all agree that slow nuclear fission is real. Only an exponential nuclear chain reaction/fission of a critical mass lasting nano-seconds set off by some mysterious means producing an explosion is fantasy, as Manne Siegbahn indicated to me in the 1960s. All full scale tests of nuclear explosions are faked. There is no way to set them off safely.

Fact remains that any nuclear chain reaction or fission must be moderated or controlled like in a peaceful nuclear power reactor to work, i.e. the neutrons must be slowed down. It is the simple reason why USA, its Department of War and Charles A. Willoughbycreated the exponential, chain-reaction atom of a critical mass splitting a-bomb explosion propaganda 1945 to impress friends and foes.

Other web articles by me about clever and funny US propaganda are:

(1) Why NASA space (Moon) travel 1969-2015 is not possible (it is just more US propaganda that asstronots can fly to the Moon) and

(2) Why skyscrapers (like WTC1&2 at NY 2001) do not collapse from top down (only terrorists believe so in New York City).

Imagine how many times we have been fooled by silly propaganda.

 

2.1 A-bombs – just propaganda to scare you

Many people today, 2016, apart from being afraid of terrorists, are also curious how a military, atomic a-bombfunctions.

I am happy to inform that a-bombs do not function at all and are nothing to fear!


It is evidently a military secret that military a-bombs do not function, but I am not a professional military. I have of course done military service and learnt how to kill … enemy soldiers. But not civilians. I am not a terrorist. I am a structural engineer and naval architect but with good knowledge of physics. Below I explain why military, a-bombs used by terrorists do not work. Media (newspapers, radio, TV, Hollywood, etc.) will never tell you this, because it seems media are under some sort of military or terrorist control. It was very easy to fool the US public 1945 and is still easier today 2016. Take an isolated school building and a fake fire brigade station and fake a terror show. Americans believe anything shown on TV or printed in newspapers and repeated by politicians.We are all told at school or reading books or learn one way or another, e.g. from the Trinity atomic Web Site (no pictures), that a first a-bomb – a Weapon of Mass Destruction, WMD – was dropped by US Air Force terrorists on Hiroshima (plenty pictures), Japan, in the morning of August 6, 1945, to end the 2nd World war. A terrorist kills innocent civilians in lieu of military soldiers. A second a-bomb was dropped on a poor suburb of Nagasaki a few days later by the same terrorists to really stop the war. BBC suggests it happened like this! Oliver Stonealso believes in the terror a-bomb and should study this article. North Korea thinks it also can explode an a-bomb 2015 (1 000 m below surface) – but it is also just nice propaganda – and keeps the North Korean nomenclatura terrorists in power. Western propaganda media copies it at once without thinking, of course. Western media loves the a-bomb dropped on civilians by terrorists.

In order to hide the truth about the a-bombs USA, when occupying Japan, immediately created the Civil Censorship Detachment (CCD) within its Civil Information Section. CCD was secret. You could not even say that censorship existed in occupied Japan.

“The US decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 was meant to kick-start the Cold War rather than end the Second World War, according to two nuclear historians who say they have new evidence backing the controversial theory.”New Scientist

“A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on.”

Winston Churchill 1945

“Additional fire raids of B-29’s would have been more destructive of life and property – this deliberate, premeditated destruction was our least abhorrent choice.”

Henry Stimson, 1947

“Look at Afghanistan. In more than ten years, the armed forces of the United States and their puppet “coalition partners” have been unable to defeat a rag-tag people’s army of cave-dwellers and primitive tribesmen armed with weaponry less effective than was used in World War I (no tanks, no planes, no heavy artillery, no poison gas and so on), in a land-locked country which receives no significant outside assistance.

When the Executive Department of the General Government declares, as it has today, that nameless, faceless bureaucrats can order the assassinations of Americans, anywhere in the world, on the basis of the mere suspicion that the targets are somehow allied with “terrorists” or other “enemies,” and no other department of the General Government or the States at any level of the federal system challenges that declaration, then America has degenerated into a politically putrescent state beyond mere “authoritarianism.” This condition constitutes a species of legal nihilism with which, heretofore, only monsters such as Caligula and Hitler were associated.”

Edwin Vieira

Defence Secretary Leon Panetta said on September 11, 2012, that the United States would have about a year to take action, if Iran decided to build a nuclear weapon.

Leon Panetta, CIA, FBI, i.a., have apparently missed this article:


Anybody taking photos of the ruins of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and suggesting, e.g. that the two a-bombs were fake was simply arrested and maybe executed because such suggestions disturbed public tranquillity. How was it possible? The CCD was run by United Stasi of America’s general Charles A. Willoughby. If Charles had remained in Germany, where he was born 1892, he would probably have had the job of Joseph Goebbels. Charles apparently was a psychopath and as such suitable for US Army service. Or for Adolf Hitler?

If you today 2016 still believe in being vaporized by an a-bomb explosion the 135 pages US Planning Guidance for Response to a Nuclear Detonation (June 2010) is recommended reading. You will, e.g. learn (p 81):

“A nuclear detonation in a modern urban area would impact the medical system more than any disaster previously experienced by the nation. Large numbers of casualties with traumatic, thermal, and radiation injuries, in all possible combinations, will be seen … The death toll will be high, but there are opportunities to save tens to hundreds of thousands of lives.”

But do not worry too much. It is just a joke.

 

2.2 The one million °C heat and one thousand bar pressure blast wave with its positive and negative phases

According the paper Blast Loading and Blast Effects on Structures – An Overview, by T. Ngo, P. Mendis, A. Gupta & J. Ramsay, The University of Melbourne, Australia, 2007 we learn:

“An explosion is defined as a large-scale, rapid and sudden release of energy. … In a nuclear explosion, energy is released from the formation of different atomic nuclei by the redistribution of the protons and neutrons within the interacting nuclei, whereas the rapid oxidation of fuel elements (carbon and hydrogen atomics) is the main source of energy in the case of chemical explosions. … The detonation of a condensed high explosive generates hot gases under pressure up to 300 kilo bar and a temperature of about 3 000-4 000C°. … The hot gas expands forcing out the volume it occupies. As a consequence, a layer of compressed air (blast wave) forms in front of this gas volume containing most of the energy released by the explosion. Blast wave instantaneously increases to a value of pressure above the ambient atmospheric pressure. This is referred to as the side-on overpressure that decays as the shock wave expands outward from the explosion source. After a short time, the pressure behind the front may drop below the ambient pressure (Figure 1). During such a negative phase, a partial vacuum is created and air is sucked in. This is also accompanied by high suction winds that carry the debris for long distances away from the explosion source”.

A chemical explosive is thus a compound or mixture which, upon the application of heat or shock, decomposes or rearranges with extreme rapidity, yielding much gas and heat. Chemical explosions normally take place at ground level and the gas forms a mushroom cloud rising in the sky after the explosion.It is suggested by many ‘experts’ that a nuclear explosion, if it really can take place, generates pure energy and no hot gases of a chemical explosion producing black smoke but something else – invisible energy corresponding to 20 000 ton of TNT exploding – heating up 1 kg of new atomics and 60 kg of unsplit Uranium atomics and 4 360 kg of scrap metal making up the bomb … and the surrounding air. No mushroom cloud will be produced by such an explosion high in the air … if it can take place.

The pure energy of the exploding a-bomb, we are told, heats up and increases the pressure of the surrounding atmosphere air so it expands producing a fireball of burning air (?) with diameter 200 meters after 0.016 seconds (see below) and a blast wave displacing outwards in the cool outside air (seen on many fake US propaganda films) at a very high velocity and with an initial pressure of a thousand bar and an initial temperature of a million °C.

Such an expanding high pressure and temperature fireball and blast wave would evidently cause more damage than a simple chemical bomb and its hot gases of rapid, local combustion of chemicals. The atomic blast wave could not be directed – it would go off in all 360° directions – and destroy anything being hit. If the bomb goes off 600 meters up in the air, the pure energy escapes in all directions and the energy directed towards ground will damage the ground and be absorbed by the ground. Evidently the velocity, pressure and temperature of the blast wave are reduced with time elapsed and distance traveled. Nuclear detonations produced high above the ground do not create dirty mushroom clouds!

US official propaganda has a slightly different description of the devastating blast wave:

 “The … (blast) wave traveled out in all directions from the explosion. The blast effects produced were uniform and essentially those of conventional large high-explosive (chemical) weapons though on a much larger scale. Thus, instead of localized effects such as the collapse of a roof truss or wall panel, entire buildings were crushed or distorted as units.The blast pressure, as with high explosives, rose almost instantaneously (?sic?) to a peak, declined more slowly, and then fell below atmospheric pressure for a period about three times the period during which it was above atmospheric pressure. The positive period–that during which the pressure was greater than atmospheric–was of much greater peak pressure than the succeeding, or negative phase. Short though the positive phase was–probably only slightly longer than a second–it lasted longer than the positive phase of ordinary bombs. Thus the effect of the atomic bomb on buildings was usually that of a powerful push, which shoved buildings over or left them leaning, whereas high explosive (chemical) bombs strike sharply and much more briefly and tend to punch holes in walls. The duration was also long enough so that almost all building failures came during the positive phase. Comparatively few evidences were found of failures of members during the longer but less intense negative phase; window shutters blown outwards toward the explosion were very rare.”

So the peak, side-on over-pressure of an a-bomb blast may be one thousand bars and the blast wave travels ~100 meter in 0.016 seconds or 6.250 m/s at the beginning according photographic evidence (see below).

The blast wave hits ground after about 0.1 second, if the bomb explodes at 600 m altitude. An area with radius 3 000 meters, like central Hiroshima, was then destroyed, blown away outwards, in less than ten seconds assuming an average blast wave velocity of 300 m/s during that time. The positive phase was one second, the blast wave was then say 1.000 meters away,assuming average blast wave velocity 1.000 m/s during that time, when reduced pressure below one bar developed, the negative phase started, and cool air was sucked into the vacuum for say three seconds. That anything should remain standing and catch fire within 1 000 meters during the four seconds, maybe longer, passage of the blast wave and its positive and negative phase appears unlikely. The temperature of the heat wave associated with the blast wave probably also fell from 1 million °C to 6.000°C after a second or 1.000°C after 10 seconds but still high enough to vaporize objects being in the way. The amount of energy released in the combined blast and heat wave was evidently enormous. Any office building in the vicinity would evidently … disappear! Wiped away. See photo right!

Bank of Japan building at Rijo Dori street, Kamiya-cho, Naka ku, Hiroshima, 2013, was built 1936 and located almost below the alleged a-bomb explosion 1945. It survived the bombing without serious damages, a clear evidence that no a-bomb was used – only napalm carpet bombing
After the blast wave has destroyed everything in its way on the ground, a mushroom cloud was developed (picture right) above the target, we are told. But mushroom clouds only form due to chemical explosions.

In order for the mushroom cloud to rise into the sky – and to be photographed as evidence of an atomic explosion – violent winds are supposed to blew to the point of atomic burst, etc, etc. Only fools believe this nonsense. All the energy of the alleged atomic explosion was distributed in all directions as a heat/blast wave and there was no time for a mushroom cloud to be formed rising in the sky. Evidently air was sucked in after the explosion but it was also from all directions.Nuclear detonations produced high above the ground do not create mushroom clouds! Nuclear detonations cannot take place at all! Let’s see what really happened at Hiroshima and what could not have happened starting with a short, historical overview:

 

2.3 Einstein

Experts suggest:

Einstein’s equation, E = mc², shows that matter that is transformed into energy may yield a total energy equivalent to the mass multiplied by the square of the velocity of light.

It is evidently a stupid, unscientific interpretation. A mass m of 1 kg of any substance cannot become (299 792 458)² or 89 875 517 873 681 764 Joule energy E just because the speed of light c is 299 792 458 m/s. The experts have totally misunderstood what Einstein and many physicists long before Einstein really meant. If 1 kg of TNT releases 4 100 000–4 602 000 or say 4 400 000 Joule of energy, energy of 1 kg of matter m corresponds to 20 426 254 062 kg of TNT and that is really a lot – 1 kg matter m has energy E corresponding to 20,4 million tons of TNT that explodes! And the Hiroshima bomb was only a mass of 61 kg of Uranium-235 + a mass of 4 339 kg of scrap!

But those experts or nuclear physicists are simply military men lying or making propaganda for a little salary to keep their jobs. They evidently call me an idiot but when I ask them to prove how clever they are they always fail. Every time!

“The mushroom cloud rising over Hiroshima, Japan. The city of Hiroshima was the target of the world’s first atomic bomb attack at 8:16 a.m. on August 6, 1945. The cloud rose to over 60,000 feet (18 000 meters) in about ten minutes.About 30 seconds after the explosion, the B-29 plane that dropped the bomb circled in order to get a better look at what was happening. By that time, although the plane was flying at 30,000 feet (9 000 meters), the mushroom cloud had risen above them. The city itself was completely engulfed in a thick black smoke.”
Source:http://www.atomicarchive.com/Photos/Hiroshima/image1.shtml(evidently the photo is a fake (of a chemical explosion) as no plane dropped an a-bomb on Hiroshima that was destroyed by napalm carpet bombings.

Any physicist suggesting a-bombs can explode is lying.They all fail my simple Challenge.

 

2.4 June 1942 work started on the a-bomb to vaporize everything and three years later it was ready

US president Franklin D Roosevelt had allegedly ordered the atomic bombs to be designed (or created) and built by clever US scientists and engineers 1939, 1941 or 1942, it is not clear why and when, because it is a military secret 2016. 1939? Before the 2nd WW even started tipped off by a stupid, foolish letter by no other than Albert Einstein that an a-bomb would work? Can we believe that? No, not possible! US public (opinion) was against any war then and vaporizing women and children. And Einstein must have been smart enough to understand that chain reaction fission without moderation was impossible. But USA started early: the very secret Briggs Advisory Committee on Uranium created by Roosevelt had its first meeting on October 21, 1939, in Washington, D.C., only seven weeks after WWII started and discussed Making Uranium (fission) chain-reaction bombs. Imagine that! What Briggs & Co found out is not known.

June 1941? When Hitler attacked USSR and it looked like Hitler would conquer the world with US looking on? No. US public (opinion) was still against any war and vaporizing people. Better to negotiate with Hitler?

Or 1942 after Japan had attacked Pearl Harbour and Hitler had declared war on USA in December 1941? Self defence! Why not? Can Japan bomb Pearl Harbour, USA can vaporize Japan! Iraq had the a-bomb according US intelligence already 2000 but found nothing after destroying the country and the Islamic Republic of Iran is apparently struggling making an a-bomb since 20 years, while the USA did it in only three years 1942-1945. Fantastic! Fantasy.

According US propaganda 2013:

In 1939, the Nazis were rumoured [sic] to be developing an atomic bomb. The United States initiated its own program under the Army Corps of Engineers in June 1942. America needed to build an atomic weapon before Germany or Japan did [which they never did]. General Leslie R. Groves, Deputy Chief of Construction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, was appointed to direct this top-secret project.

Suddenly $2 billion were available + plenty brains to vaporise the enemy! It was probably 1942 – Oak Ridge, Tennessee was allegedly built then to accommodate 75.000 poor persons that got a job in the arms industry. Nice propaganda! But most of the work was apparently done on Manhattan, New York City, NY, USA. That’s why it was called the Manhattan project. It was all propaganda like much info presented as news by the New York Times 2001. It was said that 500.000 persons in the USA were working to build the bomb!

And only three (!) years and one month later (much much faster than the JFK order 1961 to, propaganda wise, put Americans on the Moon 1969, which took 8 years), after Hitler had shot himself April 1945, the Roosevelt a-bombs were ready to be used to vaporize Japan, we are told, at a cost of $2 billion (1945). Imagine spending $2 billions … all secret! In three years! But before using the bomb in Japan it was tested in the USA:

Alamogordo a-bomb test tower before explosion!
16 July 1945 the first a-bomb exploded atAlamogordo, New Mexico, USA, we were told by media (not present). The bomb was fitted on top of a 30 metres tall steel tower, left, in the Alamogordo desert, New Mexico, USA, where there was nothing that could burn.

Of course it was suggested that the tower was vaporized and desert sand melted to become glass … but no such glass has ever been presented!

The fake bomb had been put together by a small top secret team of scientists – the Manhattan project – living at Los Alamos outside Santa Fe. A few days after the explosion they examined the foundation of the tower legs. Of course the tower legs had disappeared and were replaced by heaps (?) of sand, right.

Alamogordo a-bomb test tower after explosion!
Even more strange was that the explosion didn’t make a big, 20-30 meters deep hole in the ground – a crater – and blow away the desert sand and everyting else below. Only the tower was gone!
A photo of the explosion is right. You find it and similar ones easily on the Internet. Look at the funny, dirty, dusty, smoky mushroom cloud and the strange trunk or stem of the mushroom a few seconds after the explosion. However the event was just propaganda. The photo is a simple fake. An a-bomb explosion will not produce a mushroom stem + dirty cloud. An a-bomb explosion shall, if it works (it doesn’t), just produce pure energy – light/heat – in a FLASH. Nothing else! So no a-bomb ever detonated at Alamogordo. It was something else – a hoax! A funny joke!


When you have stopped laughing or crying, study how
Carey Sublette explains the history of the scientific jokes to support the propaganda lies that a-bombs are specifically engineered by clever experts to produce a reaction that is so fast and intense that it cannot be controlled after it has started and, when properly designed, this uncontrolled reaction can lead to an explosive energy release. The secret experts had no idea how to ignite their fake a-bomb, i.e. start the uncontrolled reaction:

March 27, 1943 – a Mr. Tolman wrote to Oppenheimer about using explosives to collapse a shell into a critical mass (to ignite the a-bomb).September 1944 – a Mr. Robert Christy suggested the “Christy gadget“, the use of a solid core that is raised to supercriticality solely bycompressing the metal to twice normal density (to ignite the a-bomb)!

April 11, 1945 – Oppenheimer reported that Kistiakowsky had achieved optimal performance with implosion compression in sub-scale tests (to ignite the a-bomb).

April 27, 1945 – Tokyo Bay (only water of course!) was dropped as a target (!) (to demonstrate ignition of the bomb) because it had already been burned down (poor fish!). Imagine burning down a sea.

June 21, 1945 – The first implosion initiator (LOL) was ready. Imagine that. An implosion initiator! To compress metal to twice normal density (to ignite the a-bomb).

So in the end the experts agreed that sudden implosion (a process in which objects are destroyed by collapsing or being squeezed in on themselves) of Uranium metal atoms to twice normal density would initiate the a-bomb detonation that would last a few nano-seconds without any testing. Of course with a fast, free neutron in between starting it! That little thing –a fast, free neutron will start exponentially fissioning billions of compressed or imploded metal atoms releasing energy and more fast, free neutrons. An a-bomb explodes! But you cannot compress an atom or a solid piece of metal by implosion. It just bounces. And the fast neutrons in between just fly away.

Carey Sublette also explains the a-bomb development history – all invented of course – to support the propaganda lies!

The first a-bomb dropped in Japan caused a lot of damage apart from vaporizing innocent people and many children: 

“The fire damage in Hiroshima (due to the a-bomb explosion) was much more complete; the centre of the city was hit and everything but the reinforced concrete buildings had virtually disappeared. A desert of clear-swept, charred remains, with only a few strong building frames left standing was a terrifying sight. … In Hiroshima, 4,400 feet from X, multi-story brick buildings were completely demolished. … Because the explosion was well up in the air, much of the damage resulted from a downward pressure. This pressure of course most largely affected flat roofs. Some telegraph and other poles immediately below the explosion remained upright while those at greater distances from the centre of damage, being more largely exposed to a horizontal thrust from the blast pressure waves, were overturned or tilted. Trees underneath the explosion remained upright but had their branches broken downward. “

Source: THE atomic BOMBINGS OF HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI by The Manhattan Engineer District, June 29, 1946.

The above is pure propaganda without any evidence at all of an atomic attack. Only fire damage? You are not informed that central Hiroshima was 1945 95% poor, shanty wood/paper houses easy to destroy by simple firebombs. Only the Gelbi Bank and the Bank of Japan concrete/brick buildings, of course fairly earthquake proof, at Rijo Dori street, Kamiya-cho, Naka-ku, Hiroshima city centre and similar with their flat roofs just below the alleged atomic explosion point were not damaged or vaporized at all on August 6, 1945, … and open for business a few days later after the fires had been extinguished and the streets had been cleared. The BoJ building is still there 2016!

Quite amazing how easy it is to fool people for more than 71 years with propaganda!

Map of Hiroshima city centre, target Aioi bridge and location of Bank of Japan office and location above where the alleged a-bomb is said to have exploded over Rijo Dori street at Kamiya-cho, Naka-ku. There are many similar stone/concrete/brick buildings in the surroundings that survived the napalm carpet fire bombings.
 

Aerial view of central Hiroshima where the alleged a-bomb is said to have exploded over Rijo Dori street at Kamiya-cho, Naka-ku in the middle producing a blast/heat wave . The main streets were quickly cleaned of ash and soot after the fires and no bridges were damaged (as they were made of steel/concrete)

Gelbi bank building 1946 at Hiroshima at Rijo Dori street – 380 meters sideways from and about 600 meters (1 800 feet) below the alleged ‘a-bomb’ explosion and blast/heat wave FIREBALL centre across the street 1945!
Downtown Hiroshima 1946 with a Gelbi bank building in back ground at Rijo Dori street! Note the Hiroshima’s ten-story press/media building also in the background right, about three blocks from the centre of the explosion, badly gutted by the fire following the explosion, but otherwise unhurt with a flagpole on top … still standing. No ‘a-bomb’ exploded down the road to the left and produced a blast/heat wave FIREBALL here 1945! It was just napalm carpet bombing

Downtown Hiroshima north of Rijo Dori street 1945 and Ground Zero, where a fake a-bomb apparently exploded and produced a FIREBALL at low altitude! Notice the trees standing bare like after a forest fire. Most of them survived and 1946 new leaves budded

Extracts from US Strategic Bombing Survey about damages to Bank of Japan and Gelbi Bank buildings, Hiroshima, 1945. The buildings only suffered fire damages and the fires were extinguised by surviving staff inside the buildings using water buckets. No atomic bomb exploded in the vicinity

 

 

2.5 A plane dropped the a-bomb 6 August 1945 – No parachute retarder

We are told that the Hiroshima a-bomb was released at 08.15 hours local time, from an altitude of 9 855 meters by some US terrorists in an alone airplane named Enola Gay.

The plane was type B-29 (right) that normally dropped 450 napalm fire bombs each of 10 kg (total 4 500 kg) on people, children, houses, schools and hospitals and similarly non-military targets on ground below in a terrorist attack – military against civilians.

About 45 fire bombs could be dropped simultaneously at 10 seconds intervals in a so called napalm carpet bombing attack at low altitude, so 450 bombs could be dropped during one and a half minute. Imagine 64 B-29s dropping 30 000 napalm bombs in a joint attack on Hiroshima. With luck only solid houses not being directly hit would remain standing. Houses with rather solid roofs would not be affected – the bombs would bounce off. It had happened in Japan several times before, e.g. at Imabari not far from Hiroshima two months earlier (and not 6 August morning) and the result was four square kilometres of destroyed, burnt downshanty housing areas in Japanese towns and only solid building standing.

A US B-29 terrorist plane dropping napalm bombs on civilians

Evidently this type of military attack was not suitable against small, industrial targets or even military troops. It was designed only to kill civilians of all ages. It was pure terrorism as terrorists target innocent civilians.Now one B-29 plane was converted to carry and drop only one a-bomb – alone – or Enola – of 4 400 kg with 61 critical mass kilograms Uranium 235 inside. But strangely enough 64 B-29s had attacked Imabari again (!) the night just before Hiroshima was destroyed. But Imabari was already destroyed then. Probably the 64 B-29s destroyed Hiroshima by carpet napalm bombings. The alone enola plane was just propaganda!

Imagine releasing one such heavy bomb in one go from a little plane. It had never been done before. How it was done is described at around 36.50 in this propaganda video. Admire the cheap actors playing the bomb plane crew that never existed … like the bomb. We are told that …

57 seconds later (no parachute retarder used), at the predetermined altitude of 600 meters, the 4 400 kg bomb detonated directly over Shima Surgical Clinic (and close to the Bank of Japan building) producing a FIREBALL and in an instant killing 75 000 civilians; the original aiming point was the Aioi Bridge, but wind blew it a little off course, we are made to believe.

The lonely bomb thus dropped 9 255 meters in 57 seconds. Average vertical velocity of the bomb was thus 162.4 m/s. If startvertical velocity was 0 and final velocity was 324.7 m/s (almost the speed of sound), it accelerated vertically at rate 5.7 m/s or 0.58g. Air resistance apparently slowed down the bomb. Starthorizontal velocity was same as the plane’s speed, say 100 m/s, but was reduced due to air friction, while the plane continued forward.

Say that bomb horizontal speed was reduced to 50 m/s after 57 seconds, then the average horizontal speed was 75 m/s and the bomb horizontal displacement during fall until explosion was 4 275 meters , i.e. the distance away from the target when dropping the bomb. The plane continued 5 700 meters at constant altitude.

Had the lonely bomb dropped another two seconds, it would have crashed against the ground … and been destroyed … and would never explode. That it actually managed to explode at 600 m altitude, while travelling at 324.7 m/s vertical speed and horizontal speed say 50 m/s after 57 seconds fly time, is evidently just propaganda. 

Approximate 57 seconds Hiroshima bomb trajectory dropping down 9.255 meters while moving forward 4 275 meters.

How to trigger a detonation at 328.5 m/s total speed at exactly the right time using 1945 technology is not clear, as it had never been done before or after. Try to Google for the answer. You’ll find nothing. But 100’s of websites suggest that it was just done.
Note that the alone Hiroshima bomb 1945 had fixed tail fins like the 200 B61 Silver Bullet atomic gravity bombs protecting me 2016.If the plane made 360 km/h or 100 m/s speed, when dropping the bomb and continued straight on, the plane would be only 9-10 km above from the explosion, i.e. 16 times further away than the Bank of Japan building below the explosion. Imagine if the bomb had exploded a little earlier. The plane would have been wiped away.

Anyway, an area of no military value with radius ~2 000 meters was wiped out by the Hiroshima lonely bomb FIREBALL, according the propaganda. It is suggested a 200 meters diameter FIREBALL was created in 0.016 seconds driving the blast wave in all directions. The blast wave then hit ground and destroyed Hiroshima and killed 75 000 persons within a second … we are supposed to believe. But it is just propaganda. Probably only 7 000 persons died in the napalm bombing raid lasting some hours, so most people could escape to surrounding mountains and via the rivers. They were just part of the US/Japan show! The B-29 pilots thought they were napalm bombing Imabari for the second time. It was very easy to change the records later as Japan was subject the severe censorship until 1952.

Buildings on Rijo Dori street at downtown Hiroshima apparently not being hit by an atomic blast wave
The atomic FIREBALL blast wave originating from release of pure energy heating up 61 kg of split and unsplit Uranium atomics corresponding to 20.000 tons of TNT exploding apparently displaced in all 360° directions at great velocity, pressure and temperature until hitting something, e.g. the ground straight below, incl. the Japan Bank buildings with their flat roofs, pushing down, or anything at the side, pushing it sideways (or the plane above pushing it upwards). The atomic FIREBALL blast wave should then bounce off whatever being hit unless what was hit was vaporized. It is like a wave at sea in the interface water/air hitting a shore (or a ship). The wave bounces (or the ship bounces). Compare also a tsunami wave hitting solid land. In that case the tsunami wave first pulls away the water close to shore – the water disappears but is actually sucked away – and then a wall of water arrives – the tsunami – destroying anything in its way.

Evidently >80-90% of the energy released 600 meters above ground just went straight up into the air and did no damage at all. Not even the plane dropping the bomb was affected.

A second WMD bomb was allegedly dropped late morning on a suburb of Nagasaki a few days later killing more innocent children.
There are many strange, eye witness testimonies of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki a-bombings all suggesting a bright FIREBALL accompanied by a rush of heat followed by a huge pressure wave and the rumbling sound of an explosion lasting a second. Some unlucky people were then vaporized! How the others survived is not clear. They should have been vaporized. Actually all testimonies were just propaganda.

If you are being vaporized, you cannot give testimony, of course. There are many photos of persons having being vaporized. They are just dark patches on a brighter background and how the photographer knows that it was a vaporized person is hard to understand.

The damages to Hiroshima and Nagasaki were very similar to the fire napalm bomb damages to Yokohama 10 weeks earlier. Plenty of local air fields were nearby that apparently were not attacked:

The Command’s last major raid of May was a daylight incendiary attack on Yokohama on 29 May conducted by 517 B-29s escorted by 101 P-51s. This force was intercepted by 150 A6M Zero fighters, sparking an intense air battle in which five B-29s were shot down and another 175 damaged. In return, the P-51 pilots claimed 26 “kills” and 23 “probables” for the loss of three fighters. The 454 B-29s that reached Yokohama struck the city’s main business district and destroyed 6.9 square miles (18 km2) of buildings; over 1000 Japanese were killed.

But the port itself with quays, cranes, docks and warehouses were not damaged at all. When I arrived at Yokohama May 1972 some parts of the city looked as if they had been bombed yesterday.

The Wikipedia description of the Hiroshima bombing is a nice but silly piece of propaganda = no evidence that any a-bomb was used.

Japan evidently has a law against nuclear weapons on its territory but it is not enforced. It is rumoured (all is secret!) that USA break this law all the time with nuclear weapons on Chichi Jima and Iwo Jima and an enormous and varied nuclear arsenal on Okinawa. Nuclear bombs (without their fissile cores) are said to be stored on the Japanese mainland at Misawa and Itazuki air bases (and possibly at Atsugi, Iwakuni, Johnson, and Komaki air bases as well), and on nuclear-armed US Navy ships stationed in Sasebo and Yokosuka (Norris et al., 2000). Good news is that it is all propaganda. No need to worry about a-bombs in Japan. Nobody knows what they are going to be used for. Nuke North Korea?

Another well known Hiroshima building located just beside the alleged a-bomb explosion in the background – but just burnt down by napalm bombs. Notice all the trees standing bare like after a forest fire. Most of them survived and 1946 new leaves budded.

Still many people including children worry today 2016 a lot about that an a-bomb will be used again and kill or vaporize innocent people in an awful terror attack.
But there is nothing to worry about. No atomic terrorist bombs worked neither 1945, nor 2016. But terrorist napalm carpet bombing worked 1945!

2.6 Napalm carpet bombing by terrorists

“In the (spring and) summer of 1945, the U.S. Army Air Force carried out one of the most intense campaigns of city destruction in the history of the world. Sixty-eight cities in Japan were attacked and all of them were either partially or completely destroyed. An estimated 1.7 million people were made homeless, 300,000 were killed, and 750,000 were wounded. … The destruction caused by conventional (terrorist napalm carpet bombing) attacks was huge. Night after night, all summer long, (Japanese) cities would go up in smoke.”Source

As media did not report this the most intense campaigns of city destruction in the history of the world, nobody gave a damn. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were simply destroyed by similar US conventional napalm, carpet, morning 1 to 5 a.m., terror bombing raids by <100 B-29 planes taking off from Iwo Jima and other islands piloted by very young and stupid American boys dropping 1 500 tons of Rocky Mountains Arsenal made napalm bombs like Tokyo, Yokohama (29 May 1945*), Nagoya and 60+ other Japanese cities in 1945 killing 100 000’s of innocent civilians. The only purpose of the bombing campaigns was to kill innocent civilians, i.e. pure terrorism.

Photo of Hiroshima ‘ground zero’ taken one (!) day after napalm bombing and still burning a little. All concrete buidings were standing

*”These were days that under the information and news control of the government, military and bureaucracy, the ordinary(Japanese)citizens, unaware of the real situation of the war, were forced into a blind obedience. As the frontline moved on Japanese soil and American bombings rose in intensity, both military and civilian establishments in over 100 cities were indiscriminately attacked. A great many unarmed ordinary citizens became victims.”

Or as Saotome Katsumoto has described it:

Picture taken of napalm carpet bombed burnt down Tokyo on 10 March 1945 with solid concrete buildings still standing … like Hiroshima

Although Tokyo would eventually be bombed on over one hundred separate occasions, one attack in particular resulted in unprecedented human suffering: the air raid that took place in the early hours of March 10, 1945. On this night, the B-29s made the heavily populated Shitamachi district of downtown Tokyo their target. Because the purpose of this raid was to demoralize the civilian population, it had several characteristics that set it apart from previous air raids.This was the first night-time raid on a Japanese city, which allowed an unprecedented number of B-29s – around three hundred – to better avoid ground-to-air fire even though they flew at a relatively low altitude in order to carry out an indiscriminate carpet bombing raid. Also, one must consider the deadly nature of the bombs themselves. Somewhere in the neighbourhood of 1 700 tons of deadly napalm incendiaries were poured into the city. The attack itself lasted less than two hours, but because the Shitamachi area was so densely covered in wooden buildings and because the flames were fanned by a seasonal north wind, everything was consumed in a raging wave of fire. In a single night, the history and fate of Tokyo were altered forever. An estimated 1,000,000 people were left homeless, countless numbers of civilians were injured, and 100.000 precious lives were lost.”


The Roosevelt Hiroshima a-bomb never existed because it didn’t work.That it worked was just propaganda spread by various insiders to other insiders before and after the show. Like the Nagasaki bomb. Both Japanese towns were simply destroyed by a US, standard, napalm, carpet terror bombing by about 70 B-29 planes raid early morning followed by single petrol bombs exploding and setting fire to a cloud of petrol mist above the towns looking like a FIREBALL… that could be reported as an atomic bomb. The Japanese houses were generally simple wooden structures that burnt down quickly. Growing trees on the other hand didn’t burn so easy. And walls of concrete and brick buildings remained intact. Solid bank buildings were not even damaged inside! The napalm bombs were made by the US Rocky Mountains Arsenal area of which that today is an ecological disaster that will cost US$ billions to clean up.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki bomb damaged areas were quickly cleaned up after all wood/paper had burnt August 1945. Roof tiles, metal piping and cables were collected and recycled. When the allies arrived September 1945 only a barren flat city landscape could be seen with the few concrete office buildings still standing.

US propaganda June 8, 2013, suggests, e.g.:

“Japanese intelligence was predicting that U.S. forces might not invade for months. Soviet forces, on the other hand, could be in Japan proper in as little as 10 days. The Soviet invasion made a decision on ending the war extremely time sensitive.Source

Evidently Soviet forces had few ships in the Far East to invade Japan 1945. So Japan capitulated 16 August 1945 and only USAoccupied Japan until 1952. USSR and others just looked on. US President Roosevelt appointed General D MacArthur to govern Japan singlehandedly who immediately created the Civil Censorship Detachment (CCD) within its Civil Information Section. CCD was secret. You could not even say that censorship existed. Media could only publish what MacArthur approved, e.g. that MacArthur was always right! Anybody in Japan taking photos of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and suggesting, e.g. that the two a-bombs were fake was simply arrested and maybe executed because such suggestions disturbed public tranquillity. How was it possible? The CCD was run by a friend of MacArthur: United Stasi of America’s general Charles A. Willoughby in pure Soviet style. If you didn’t agree with Charles you were shot. Charles apparently was a psychopath clever to invent things and as such suitable for US (Nazi Germany, USSR …) Army intelligence and counter-intelligence services.

The propaganda lies and methods enforced by Charles A. Willoughby in Japan 1945-1952 are still on, of course … 2016. KILLING OUR OWN – The Disaster of America’s Experience with atomic Radiation by Harvey Wasserman & Norman Solomon with Robert Alvarez & Eleanor Walters issued as a Delta Book 1982 is typical. We are told that in the 1950’s young farm boys in small villages in remote areas of the USA saw a-bombs explode in the distance and were later contaminated and died.  

Richard Rhodes has, e.g., given the definitive story of man’s most awesome discovery and invention. Told in rich human, political, and scientific detail, The Making of the atomic Bomb is a narrative tour de force and a document with literary power commensurate with its subject:  

Few great discoveries have evolved so swiftly-or have been so misunderstood. From the theoretical discussions of nuclear energy to the bright glare of Trinity, there was a span of hardly more than twenty-five years. What began as merely an interesting speculative problem in physics grew into the Manhattan Project, and then into the bomb, with frightening rapidity, while scientists known only to their peers – Szilard, Teller, Oppenheimer, Bohr, Meitner, Fermi, Lawrence, and von Neumann-stepped from their ivory towers into the limelight.

But Wasserman, Solomon and Rhodes are just copying and pasting silly propaganda. An atomic WMD did not work 1945 or 1953 and doesn’t work today. Isn’t it good news? The US propaganda worked very well 1945 as the Japanese military government at the time was part of the deal. The Japanese happily played along and announced that two a-bombs had hit Japan … and that Japan must surrender. And the USSR would not occupy Japan. Everybody was very happy. Of course millions of Japanese were almost starved to death during the US military occupation 1945-1952 of Japan in order not to make trouble. American secret censorship made the rest. Historians were fooled. It works 2016.

Except Klaus Fuchs, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg and some others.

Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were convicted of conspiracy to commit espionage during a time of war and to the passing of information about the a-bomb (that it didn’t work!) to the Soviet Union and allegedly executed 1953, actually murdered. Or, better, were given new identities to carry on their happy lives out of the limelight?

 

2.7 Klaus Fuchs

Klaus Fuchs was a German engineer, physicist and communist born 1911 at Kiel that escaped from Nazi Germany and studied and worked in Great Britain in the 1930’s. He was 1942 persuaded to work as a civilian for the US Manhattan project together with 12 Nobel Prize winners to develop the (fake) a-bomb in UK, Canada and at Los Alamos, NM, USA and to sign the declaration form of the Official Secrets Act that provides for the protection of state secrets and official information, mainly related to national security. Poor Fuchs could therefore not tell anybody what he was doing.

Fuchs apparently soon found out that the Manhattan project was just propaganda (young engineers like him writing science fiction papers or screwing together something looking like a bomb) … but he could not tell anybody. National security! Crazy, wasn’t it. So Klaus told the stupid secret about the a-bomb that didn’t work to some representatives of the USSR, so that they knew what was going on. He shouldn’t have done that. 1950 Fuchs was arrested and jailed, later condemned to 14 years prison for treason after a 90 minutes trial in the UK. Tough luck. 9 years later he was kicked out of UK and settled at Dresden. The Fuchs’ arrest and trial and the Rosenbergs’ executions were clear signs to any civilian physicist in the know that a-bombs do not work – shut up or … .

Klaus Fuchs 1950

 

2.8 The Soviet a-bombs

4 to 11 February 1945 Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin met at Yalta, USSR, to discuss how to divide the world after the defeats of Nazi-Germany and Japan. Roosevelt/Churchill indicated that they had a little surprise for Stalin. And the days/night 14/16 February centralDresden (Altstadt and Neustadt), Germany, a town of no military or industrial value was completely destroyed or burnt down by US/UK carpet napalm terror bombing raids. The only purpose was to show Stalin what happens to countries that do not respect agreements made. The Red Army arrived at Dresden early May 1945 and could see the result of UK and US governments’ terrorism. There was more military industry at little Freiberg 35 kms west than at 15 times bigger Dresden but Freiberg was never bombed. My house there is still standing.

The US (fake) first atomic test bomb exploded in New Mexico 16 July 1945, we are told, and president Truman was informed, we are told, who indicated to USSR dictator Stalin 24 July 1945 at Potsdam, Germany, that USA had a new weapon.

Two days later 26 July 1945 US, UK and US puppet CKS/China but not USSR agreed and published a Proclamation Defining Terms for Japanese Surrender (the Potsdam proclamation) to the effect that

“Japan shall be given an opportunity to end this war … for Japan to decide whether she will continue to be controlled by those self-willed militaristic advisers whose unintelligent calculations have brought the Empire of Japan to the threshold of annihilation, or whether she will follow the path of reason … we insist that a new order of peace, security and justice will be impossible until irresponsible militarism is driven from the world …. Freedom of speech, of religion, and of thought, as well as respect for the fundamental human rights shall be established … Japanese participation in world trade relations shall be permitted … The occupying forces of the Allies shall be withdrawn from Japan as soon as these objectives have been accomplished … We call upon the government of Japan to proclaim now the unconditional surrender of all Japanese armed forces, and to provide proper and adequate assurances of their good faith in such action. The alternative for Japan is prompt and utter destruction.”

The alternative for Japan was not the a-bomb! It was secret. But USA didn’t await any response from Japan to this proclamation. Three weeks later the fake a-bombs were brought into action. Why not? USA had invested a lot in this nonsense.

Klaus Fuchs had already 1 July 1945 told his USSR spy masters about the US test of the (fake) bomb so Stalin and/or his deputy Beria was in the picture. Two more (fake) US a-bombs destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan 6 and 9 August. In reality it was the same B-29s piloted by young, stupid American boys 18-19 years old not having a clue where they were that had destroyed Dresden a night in February that now destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki during two nights in August 1945 with their napalm bombs (and 60+ other Japanese cities). The atomic bomb 20 000 000 kg TNT FLASH, bla, bla, early morning was just propaganda.

Back in Moscow Stalin or Beria created 20 August 1945 a secret committee to produce a Soviet ‘atomic’ bomb, fake of course, as quickly as possible. The committee consisted of three communist gangsters, Malenkov, Voznessenski and Zaveniaguine and three corrupt scientists, Kurtchatov, Joffé and Kapitsa. Kapitsa had already 11 October 1941 written an article in Pravda about how to build an a-bomb that could wipe out a city, so it was no news. The committee also got, 11 October 1945, a full set of plans of the US (fake) bomb provided by Fuchs so it was just to copy and paste and … voilà – the USSR would have its (fake) bomb at little cost.

However, USSR had no (fake) Uranium ore or metal to produce the (fake) bomb. To produce a fake a-bomb you need enriched, fake Uranium metal to make the hoax more realistic. And the Uranium could anyway be used in peaceful, soviet, nuclear power plants. But where could Stalin get his Uranium?

 

2.9 Wismut AG

A quick study revealed that Saxony/Erzgebirge in the by the USSR occupied part of Germany had plenty of old, abandoned silver mines full of Uranium oxide (pitchblende). USSR secret service (NKVD/KGB) thus created (late 1945 or 1947) a German limited company,Wismut AG, to pursue mining Uranium in Saxony.

One problem was that 95%+ of all Saxon mines, not very deep, say average 50 meters, but long, had been closed around 1900 being emptied of all silver and that the mining equipment was medieval or 1800-style – hammer, chisel and brute human force. Uranium ore mining therefore started 1945 with hammer and chisel and managed to produce just 10 000 kg (or ten tons!) of very low (0.02%!)Uranium oxide content ore 1946 that was shipped off by train in wooden boxes to the Mayak factory north of Chelyabinsk in Siberia, where the USSR (fake) bomb was being built in great secrecy by 300 000 gulag prisoners. And … hast Du mir gesehen … Uranium ore production increased in Saxony thanks to a friend of mine working for the corrupt Wismut AG at Objekt 15 and otherwise and on 26 August 1949 the USSR announced that it had exploded its (fake) a-bomb at 08.00 hrs local time. In all secrecy, of course. Western media published the lies as truth. The cold war had started.

The Wismut AG fairy tale is described by Rudolf Boch and Rainer Karlsch (Hg.) in their book Uranbergbau im Kalten Krieg – Die Wismut im sowjetischen Atomkomplex (Ch. Links Verlag, Berlin 2011).

Fake USSR a-bomb exploding 29 August 1949. Note the black smoke


Wismut AG never produced any Uranium for the USSR in spite of all propaganda to the opposite and the Mayak factory never built any a-bombs. Everything was top secret about Wismut AG to 1991 and now, 2016, official records do show that no Uranium was produced at all. Only ore of no value was shipped off to the USSR as part of the Stalin a-bomb show.

2.10 – 300 Stalin prizes

On 29 September 1949 about 300 USSR engineers and scientists received the Stalin Prize of 1st or 2nd order for the achievement to put a Soviet (fake) a-bomb together and blow it up. Imagine that the USSR managed to build in all secrecy (or copy paste together using Fuchs’ fake plans) a (fake) a-bomb from scratch in only four years. USA thought it would take the USSR 20 years. All fake of course.

There is no business like the fake nuke business. It goes full speed 2016! Iran and North Korea are in the lead!

Stalin was then the most powerful man in the world, he thought or dreamt. But he was just a terrorist having killed millions of civilians in USSR since 1928. Stalin was also sick, alcoholic, old and useless with no friends and didn’t know what to do with his fake bomb.To scare him 1st November 1952 United States exploded its first hydrogen bomb – the h-bomb – triggered by a small (fake) a-bomb. It was 100 times stronger than the a-bomb but of course 100% fake.

Stalin didn’t like it and died around 1 March 1953 murdered, shot, poisoned, sick or just faded away. Nobody knows how he died. Another mystery. But 1st August 1953 the USSR tested its first hydrogen bomb, too, triggered by a small a-bomb, media reported. It was 10 times stronger than the US bomb! It was of course also fake – invented by Beria (?), who at the time was in jail since 25 June – but western media said it was true. Beria was shot 23 December 1953 unless he had been murdered earlier. The cold war was heating up.

26 years later the USSR invaded Afghanistan December 1979 to help the local population make a revolution so that all children could go to school and that all people had access to medical assistance or whatever: they were the cover-ups of the 1979 Soviet aggression. Civil war broke out. February 1989 the USSR was defeated and left after having lost at least 14 000 dead, 53 000 physically injured and a couple of 100 000’s mentally destroyed USSR soldiers – a majority of them 17-21 years old children – and civilians.

USSR never used its a-bomb toys at Afghanistan as they never existed and the USSR itself ceased to exist 1991.

The USSR/Stalin/Beria a-bombs were just fake for 42 years.

But the world believed that the USSR had the a-bombs ready to drop them anywhere thanks to Western media. Modern Russia is keeping up the illusion. Doesn’t cost them much … but why not state today it was a hoax? Aha, Russia is still an a-bomb power!

 

2.11 A-bomb radiation 1945 and similar things 2011 – how dangerous is the radiation at Fukushima?

Gamma rays are emitted during nuclear fission in (fake!) nuclear explosions
According media about 70 000 persons died immediately at Hiroshima due to the a-bomb explosion 1945 and another 70 000 persons died later due to radiation (gamma rays) and poisoned by radiactive fall-out. Over the decades the American and Japanese governments have spent more than $100 million to try to understand just what the radiation from the atomic bombs did to the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. One interpretation is that no a-bombs were dropped at all so there were no nuclear explosions and no gamma ray radiation. It was just propaganda. Evidently during seven years of US occupation of Japan no real radiation studies of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were done. The authorities just claimed that two a-bombs had exploded, that people were dying of radiation and anybody disagreeing, particularly the ‘Hibakusha‘, the poor a-bomb survivors (a clever invention!), would be visitied by the local yakusas* to be told to shut up or getting problems. So all Japanese just agreed with the 1945 a-bomb nonsense to carry on peacefully. No big deal actually. Japan became quickly an economic super power. But normal people were scared for ever of this mysterious radiation.

11 March 2011 the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster took place. A few hours earlier there was the Tohoku very strong earthquakewith its epicentre far away out at sea that produced a tsunami that flooded the coastal area and killed ~15 000 persons and caused big damages and complete power failures. There were no earthquake damages anywhere on shore. The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant was however stopped due to the earthquake and before the tsunami hit the coast, i.e. control rods were lowered that absorbed the neutrons stopping the fission and the moderating medium – water – was being cooled down by electric pumps circulating water.The tsunami unfortunately destroyed not only the normal but also the local, in-house emergency electric power system of the Fukushima Daiichi plant (the emergency generators were located in the basement that actually was flooded first!), so the cooling pumps didn’t work and some reactors overheated when cooling failed, the moderating water started to boil and radioactive gasses incl. hydrogen leaked into the environment through safety valves and exploded (the roofs were blown off) … we were told … and people could get killed by radiation (gamma rays) and radioactive fall-out poisoning! Otherwise the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant was intact.

You should wonder why this serious defect had not been discovered at the frequent emergency exercises of the 30+ years old plant – that, when the emergency electric power system didn’t work, you could not cool down the moderating water! Had a third power system been provided (on the roof?) or, if cooling could be done by gravity or by engine driven pumps, the shut down and cooling down of the plant could easily have been done as planned and the nuclear disaster avoided. The water cooling requirements are fairly big when running at full output – about than 7.500 m3/hour for a reactor – but the head is small so little power is required. And much less cooling water is required in an emergency, when the unit is switched off and just needs to be kept cool due to natural fission. And explosive, hydrogen gasses? They should have been collected and simply been burnt off.

Due to alleged radiation there was panic and people were told to leave the area and that they could not return. The Japan Self Defense Force moved in and forcibly evacuated people forgetting it was not its job. Part of the panic and show was to temporarily close all, 50+ Japanese nuclear power plants that were running safely unaffected by any erthquakes. You should really wonder why. Evidently there was radiation at Fukushima but how much and how dangerous it is, is still being discussed. Many people including nuclear experts supporting fake a-bombs mix up milliSievert/hour (mSv/h) with microSievert/hour (µSv/h) the latter being 1000 times smaller. It seems 1 µSv/h radiation is safe and normal and 400 mSv/h is unnormal and will kill you, the latter being 400 000 times bigger. It seems the level is <1 µSv/h at Fukushima today.


Thus –
milliSieverts may be dangerous. But microSiverts and Low Dose Radiation and the Linear No-Threshold hypothesis, LNT, that Leaves No Trace, LNT? I assume James Muckerheide knows what he is talking about.It seems also April 2016 that nobody died or has died later in Japan from radiation of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. People have died of stress and similar – being frightened or chased away from their homes by the JSDF – but radiation? The only ones getting rich were the local yakusas* that took over the alleged “cleaning up” of the areas around the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station that were sealed off at once.

Media were told by corrrupt politicians to exaggerate the damages to the nuclear power plant and dangers and effects of radiation and radioactive pollution and the yakusas* could hire poor, uneducated Japanese to be dressed up in white boiler suits to “clean up” the radioactivity and eliminate the radiation. If you ask for details about the “cleaning up”, you will not get any. Except that the nuclear a-bomb radiation show goes on, even if no nuclear bomb went off at Fukushima, Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

There were and are many political reasons to keep the Japanese population scared about anything nuclear and plenty corrupt Japanese politicians and civil servants were and are assisting the 71 years old a-bomb hoax and now the new, 2011 Fukushima show. But it didnt last! 29 March 2016 42 Japanese nuclear reactors are operable and potentially able to restart, and 24 of these are in the process of restart approvals. The first two restarted in August and October 2015. Evidently there was no need to stop them at all March 2011.

42 peaceful and safe Japanese nuclear reactors can provide 27% of the electrical demand and hopefully they will be up and running soon again. They should on the other hand close the nuclear museums at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They are just full of lies and nonsense.

(*Yakusas are Japanese gangster cartels more powerful than any Italian or US mafia that run parts of Japan society since it was opened up to foreigners around 1860)

There are other inhabited radioactive locations in the world, e.g. Ramsar’s Talesh Mahalleh district in Iran is the most radioactive inhabited area known on Earth, due to nearby hot springs and building materials originating from them. A combined population of 2 000 residents from this district and other high radiation neighbourhoods receive an average radiation dose of 10 mGy per year, ten times more than the ICRP recommended limit for exposure to the public from artificial sources. Record levels were found in a house where the effective radiation dose due to external radiation was 131 mSv/a, and the committed dose from radon was 72 mSv/a. This unique case is over 80 times higher than the world average background radiation.

The ICRP has investigated the Fukushima 2011 incident and concluded, e.g.:

There are great difficulties to communicate radiological information to non-experts and the public at large using the ICRP system and its quantities. …An important confusion has been triggered by the fact that the quantities equivalent dose (to an organ or tissue) and effective dose have a common unit, the sievert. …

There have been some difficulties for transiting from the emergency exposure situation created by the accident to the existing exposure situation that will remain in the long term. A main difficulty seems to be how to define and decide when the emergency exposure situation is terminated and the existing exposure situation starts. …

Etc, etc. Big confusion. Easy to fool people! An emergency exposure is of very short duration during the emergency, an existing exposure takes place today.

So what is the existing exposure today at Fukushima? The answer is below. But first let’s review the units used:

Gray: The IS unit for the energy absorbed from ionizing radiation, equal to one joule per kilogram. An absorbed dose of one gray is equal to the absorption of one joule of radiation energy by one kilogram of matter. The gray is the correct unit to use when you wish to monitor energy absorbed per unit mass. 

Sievert: The IS unit for the amount of ionizing radiation required to produce the same biological effect as one rad of high-penetration x-rays, equivalent to a gray for x-rays. It measures the radioactive dose equivalent. One sievert is equal to one gray multiplied by a relative biological effective factor, Q, and a factor that takes into account the distribution of the radiation energy, N. The sievert is the correct unit to use when you wish to monitor the biological danger of radiation.

Do you follow? Let’s sum up!

1 gray (Gy) = 100 rad

1 rad = 10 milligray (mGy)

1 sievert (Sv) = 1.000 millisieverts (mSv) = 1.000.000 microsieverts (µSv)

1 sievert = 100 rem

1 becquerel (Bq) = 1 count per second (cps)

1 curie = 37,000,000,000 becquerel = 37 Gigabecquerels (GBq)

For x-rays and gamma rays, 1 rad = 1 rem = 10 mSv

For neutrons, 1 rad = 5 to 20 rem (depending on energy level) = 50-200 mSv

For alpha radiation (helium-4 nuclei), 1 rad = 20 rem = 200 mSv

Etc, etc.

The World Health Organization has investigated the radiation exposures of Fukushima:  

The present results suggest that the increases in the incidence of human disease attributable to the additional radiation exposure from the Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident are likely to remain below detectable levels. … To date, the Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident has not resulted in acute radiation effects among workers. None of the seven reported deaths among workers is attributable to radiation exposure.

Etc, etc.

The World Nuclear Association has studied the radiation exposure at Fukushima:

On 11 April 2012 the government suggested that those outside the 20km zone who were likely to accumulate 20 mSv total dose should move out within a month. Data at the end of May (with most I-131 gone by decay) showed that about half of the 20 km evacuation zone and a similar area to the NW, total about 1000 sq km, would give an annual dose of 20 mSv to March 2012. …From April 2012 part of the 20-km radius area and the portion of Minami Soma city extending north from it, were recategorised by the Environment Ministry: below 20 mSv/yr, evacuation called off; 20-50 mSv/yr “restrict residency”, allowing entry for specific purposes with no protective equipment required and remediation action to be completed in March 2014 (now 2017); and over 50 mSv/yr “difficulty of return”, with restricted entry and remediation deferred. These restricted areas, comprising about half of the 20-km radius evacuation zone, are not expected to drop below 20 mSv/yr before about March 2016. Such areas add to those devastated by the tsunami, where rebuilding is very uncertain.

If you Google for existing radiation exposure at Fukushima today 2016, you do not get any real answers. Maybe the radiation is really 10 µSv per hour that adds up to 87 600 µSv per year or 87.6 mSv per year, which is much above the 20 mSv/year to worry about. There is plenty info about the short term emergency exposure March 2011 though that scared the population to flee. The answer probably is that the existing radiation exposure at Fukushima (apart from very close to the nuclear power plant) five years later is less than that ofRamsar’s Talesh Mahalleh district in Iran today.

 

 

2.12 The French a-bombs … and h-bombs

But didn’t France governed by our famous Général explode a-bombs 1960 and 1966, you may ask? Oui, the Général produced his first a-bomb-show February 13, 1960, in the middle of desert Sahara and 60 persons flown in witnessed it. It was followed by 16 more Sahara desert explosions, three of which also in the air. Of course, the visitors were all asked to turn around and close their eyes, when the bombs exploded (to protect their eyes) … and were later shown photos/films of what they were supposed to have seen – a FIREBALL. They were of course impressed. Same July 2, 1966, at Mururoa, a deserted island in the middle of the Pacific with the Général as host. Only (not) seen by some flown in witnesses being asked to turn around, close their eyes, etc, etc. It was the first off 193 explosions at Mururoa of which 43 were in the air producing FIREBALLS. On 24 August 1968 the Général exploded his first h-bomb at Mururoa. The witnesses evidently had no reason to doubt what the Général told them. All French witnesses were proud and certain to contribute to the greatness (grandeur) of France. But the Général simply fooled them. The 1960’s French propaganda was not very clever. A big, impressive balloon is used to carry the various bombs in the Pacific (they must be heavy!) that allegedly explode at 600 meter altitude and the shows are filmed from very far away. All viewers are standing up in the open but are asked to turn around, when the bombs go off. In one case the FIREBALL allegedly heats up the water 600 meter below to boiling point and boiling water/vapour emerges, blah, blah, but there is no tsunami or shock wave. The films are cut to insert pictures of happy, invited Frenchmen. All FIREBALLS are simple trick film. Fooled plenty people then.

Fake photo of imaginary a-bomb explosion in the South Pacific
The French have much better ideas than a-bombs and ICBMs to protect themselves that is still working today. French nuclear submarines with short range conventional missiles are always stationed close to the allies’ and enemies’ shores and they can wipe out the allies’ and enemies’ headquarters in short time. Keep it simple.

 

 

2.13 The China a-bomb 1964

The People’s Republic of China, PRC, became an a-bomb power 1964. The PRC-bomb was pulled by horses into position and cheered on by plenty people.

By pushing the RED button in the middle – photo right – nothing really happens except that many lights flashes, etc, etc.

 

2.14 The US propaganda machine 2015 – nuclear terrorism 2016

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGhWB2px99g


More good news 2012 is that the United Nations are firmly against nuclear weapons with a few stupid countries disagreeing. It means that the US NNSA does not have to carry out stupid experiments again with US tax payers footing the bill.But US invests a lot in the hoax 2015.

Imagine, e.g., all nonsense about the LGM-118 Peacekeeper:  

The LGM-118A Peacekeeper, also known as the MX missile (for Missile-eXperimental), was a land-based ICBM deployed by the United States starting in 1986. The Peacekeeper was a MIRV missile; it could carry up to 10 re-entry vehicles, each armed with a 300-kiloton W87 warhead/MK-21 RVs. A total of 50 missiles were deployed after a long and troubled development period.

As nuclear weapons do not work, imagine all money wasted (actually stolen by US Pentagon insiders) with the LGM-118 Peacekeeper. And ICBMs do not work either. They burn up at re-entry.

All atomic or nuclear bomb information is silly propaganda! Like the NASA human space travel project. To produce all the nonsense a lot of Americans are kept busy since 1945 and it has become a family business. The children, grand children and great grand children of the original propagandists keep the fire burning 2016. It is a boring job … doing nothing … resulting in drugs and alcohol abuse. But it is paid for by the government and it is protected by security and media will never look into it.

According Isao Hashimoto 2 053 atomic Uranium or plutonium bombs or trigger devices for hydrogen bombs have exploded in the period 1945-1998. I am happy to inform it is also all propaganda! Not one a-bomb has exploded, ever!

However, there is a new, big problem today 2016:

Nuclear terrorism!

You must have heard about it. Terrible stuff!

1 April 2016 B. Obama said:

“… the danger of a terrorist group obtaining and using a nuclear weapon is one of the greatest threats to global security.”

The POTUS was just repeating old nonsense about a-bombs to scare at the 2016 Nuclear Scare hm Security Summit at Washington, DC, where about 50 really silly representatives of countries and some organizations met one evening for dinner and the next day (1 April) for a group photo:

Then they had lunch … and a little chit-chat … and went home again. Media hardly reported the meaningless encounter. What terroristgroup is obtaining a nuclear weapon today? Any ideas? Let’s look back!

The Nuclear Security Summit (NSS) is a bi-annual world summit, aimed at preventing nuclear terrorism around the globe.

A terrorist is a (sick) anonymous person murdering innocent civilians to scare other innocent civilians that cannot do much about it anyway. The terrorist is today normally immediately killed by local police after the murders, so it is risky business. Recent crazy examples here in France: (1) Terrorists attack a satiric magazine editorial office and kill editors and cartoonists but were hunted down and killed by police, (2) Terrorists attack Paris restaurants and music hall full of people having dinner or listening to music shooting them down but are killed in return by police. (3) A terrorist rents a heavy, slow truck and drives it into crowds of people watching fireworks at Nice killing 84 but is killed by police. (4) Terrorists interrupt morning mass/prayers in a remote village in Normandy, take a few people hostage and cut the throat of the priest but are killed by police. It is little you can do about such crazy terrorism.

Nuclear terrorism on the other hand refers to an act of terrorism in which a person or persons belonging to a terrorist organization detonates a nuclear device. But as it is not possible to detonate an a-bomb or similar nuclear device, nuclear terrorism doesn’t really exist. It is an invention/propaganda to scare us! Invention? By whom?

The first Nuclear Security Summit was held at Washington DC, April 12-13, 2010, with world leaders from 47 countries incl. Turkey(Erdogan!) and three international organizations participating hosted by Obama! No terrorists that were obtaining nuclear weapons were named!

The second Nuclear Security Summit was held at Seoul, South Korea, March 26-27, 2012, with 58 world leaders from 53 states incl.Turkey (Erdogan again!) and four international organizations, including the United Nations, International Atomic Energy Agency, the European Union and INTERPOL, participated. Again no terrorists that were obtaining nuclear weapons were named!

The third Nuclear Security Summit was held at The Hague, the Netherlands, March 24 and 25, 2014, again with 58 world leaders (5 of which from observing international organizations) incl. Turkey (A. Gül – Erdogan was on vaccation), some 5 000 (!) delegates and some 3 000 (!!) journalists. Imagine that – 5 000 delegates and 3 000 journalists – assembled during two days and nobody could name one terrorist that was obtaining nuclear weapons. After four years no world leaders could still identify any terrorist that was obtaining nuclear weapons. And not one of 3 000 journalists asked them! What is the purpose of media?

And at the fourth Nuclear Security Summit the few attending journalists were asked by the POTUS to leave the room and not ask any questions or report anything. ROTFL! No delegates of any kind were seen! But Recep Tayyip Erdogan, President of Turkey was there … as he was 2010! And according Obama:

“… the danger of a terrorist group obtaining and using a nuclear weapon is one of the greatest threats to global security.”

But since 2010 Obama and 16 separate US government agencies that work to conduct intelligence activities considered necessary for the US national security haven’t been able to name or identify any such terrorist group. The Washington Post reported in 2010 that there were 1 271 government organizations and 1 931 private companies in 10 000 locations in the United States that are working on counterterrorism, homeland security and intelligence, and that the intelligence community as a whole includes 854 000 people holding top-secret clearances. But none has been able to name a terrorist group trying to obtain a nuclear weapon.

Recep Tayyip Erdogan, President of Turkey, is according media supporting the terrorist group ISIS, Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, just south of the border and Turkey, a member of NATO, stores plenty US a-bombs … and nobody cares. Reason is that all a-bombs, incl. the US ones in Turkey, are dummies.

In my clear, healthy mind a-bombs and nuclear terrorists simply do not exist. Only sick military minds and sick world leaders of all kind (Turkey?) think otherwise and waste their times at semi-annual, nonsensical Nuclear Security Summits. Media are part of the show … and are paid for it.

 

Go to Part 2 – Why a-bombs do not work

 

Heiwa Co home page

 

The 911-report and the CIA Torture report written by members of the U.S. Congress can be read free of charge on the net. I review the reports here. Interesting reading. One POTUS encouraged 2001 the CIA to use tortureto find out how terrorists are brainwashed to terrorize (CIA failed!) and another POTUS ordered 2011 the top terrorist to be murdered, so we would never know what really happened.In 1942 a third POTUS decided to fake a bomb!
Warning for pseudoscience

Have you heard about Trofim Lyssenko? He was the inventor of pseudoscience around 1930! Stalin loved him. Ever heard about Stalin? A very competent mass murderer that together with Hitler, an incompetent madman, started WW2 by attacking east Poland and Finland 1939 and the Baltic states 1940 and who US president Roosevelt liked a lot. Stalin could keep east Poland and the Baltic states after WW2. Ever heard about Roosevelt? He was very competent and created the fake a-bomb! With a little help from friends.A-bombs were and are just propaganda lies. There is no evidence that they worked 1945 or later. The a-bomb was invented by an American Robert O Lyssenko – a cousin of Trofim – but assisted by A. Einstein and encouraged by Roosevelt!

USA is the greatest military force on Earth since WW2 with shiny uniforms, medals, salutes, KIAs, MIAs, etc. And it has lost most wars since 1945 because it doesn’t use its a-bombs. Do you know why?

No a-bomb has ever exploded on planet Earth. The a-bombs are just a hoax to keep you afraid!

Roosevelt died 1945 with the secret. He was only 63. Seven years younger than me 2016, who is still young and beautiful (see photo top right) to tell you the Truth many years on. It upsets plenty people. It is the whole idea!

Summary:

1. This article explains the good news that a-bombs do not work.
 

2. Any info to the opposite is false US propaganda since 1945.

 

3. The almost 71 years old hoax from 6 August 1945 is of course still working kept going strong by several governments, crazy armed forces and plenty physicists incl. Nobel prize winners that cannot get any better jobs than lying for their governments – the only real job many physicists can get apart from being school teachers – and by mainstream media that are experts in publishing false info.

4. 10 000’s of a-bombs have since 1946 been built, transported around, mishandled, dropped by mistake but none has ever exploded.
5. Reason is that an a-bomb cannot explode. It is physically impossible.
 

6. Nuclear arms are therefore very safe and secure! They cannot harm anything.

7. The Islamic Republic of Iran is trying since 30 years to fake an a-bomb that Stalin did in four years 65 years ago assisted by Gulag prisoners and Wismut AG of Aue, Saxony.
 

8. The International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA, and its boss Yukiya Amano and the dictator of North Korea are part of the hoax. Just ask them about it. They are paid to lie about a-bombs. Just laugh at them and refer them to this web site.

Content:3.1 An a-bomb does not work (Iran and ISIS, please, take note!)

3.2 Anyone, incl. Iran, can build a 4 400 kg heavy a-bomb … but it does not work

3.3 The Björkman a-bomb – total weight 80 kg

3.4 But you need Uranium-235 … and it is a little complicated

3.5 Compress mechanically metal Uranium-235 and suddenly it explodes

3.6 Uranium-235 explodes if it has a critical mass

3.7 But only 0.1% of a Uranium-235 atomic becomes energy in an a-bomb

3.8 … only 1.5% of the Uranium-235 critical mass exploded or fissioned in an a-bomb

3.9 Fission fizzle

3.10 Only fools believe that metal in mechanical contact with metal explodes

3.11 Psychological shock

3.12 Japan is a nice country … and no a-bombs exploded there

3.13 A-bomb testing … by underpaid, summer working, stupid American and British students

3.14 No scientific evidence that an atomic device can explode = good news!

3.15 Only risk is overheating and melting of the metal and surroundings

3.16 An exponential chain reaction is not possible – Congratulations Iran, sorry or be happy Israel

4.1 Recommended videos

5.1 Iran could make the a-bomb within 10 months: experts:

6.1 Addendum 1

6.2 Addendum 2

6.3 Addendum 3

6.4 Addendum 4

7.1 Why this web page?

3.1 An a-bomb does not work (Iran and ISIS, please, take note!)

 

Wikipedia cannot explain how an a-bomb works, so I (left) will here explain how it doesn’t work and I will pay you €1.000.000:- if you prove me wrong in other matters.

In the USA it is against the law to even suggest that a-bombs do not work but I am living in southern France, where the sun is shining most of the time and the wine is good.

Swedish Nobel prize winner (physic) Manne Siegbahn was 1945 asked to build a Swedish a-bomb but when he suggested that he would publish the drawings … he didn’t get the job! And USSR dictator Stalin built his a-bomb 1945-1949 with Uranium ore from Wismut AG that … didn’t contain any Uranium to talk about. Knowing Manne and Wismut AG convinced me that a-bombs do not work. It is simply silly propaganda based on pseudoscience to keep you afraid.

We are told that the US made, 4 400 kg heavy, Hiroshima atomic WMD bomb called ‘Little Boy’ was designed as follows (the drawing is a silly fake):

It was secretly designed by a small number crazy people 1943/45 that after a while believed their own lies supported by media and military. Effective propaganda made then people believe it was and is a real bomb.

It worked as follows according to How Nuclear Bombs Work by William Harris, Craig Freudenrich, Ph.D. and John Fuller:

The simplest way to bring the subcritical masses together is to make a gun that fires one mass into the other. A sphere of U235 is made around the neutron generator and a small bullet of U235 is removed. The bullet is placed at the one end of a long tube with explosives behind it, while the sphere is placed at the other end. A barometric-pressure sensor determines the appropriate altitude for detonation and triggers the following sequence of events:1. The explosives fire and propel the bullet down the barrel.

2. The bullet strikes the sphere and generator, initiating the fission reaction.

3. The fission reaction begins.

4. The bomb explodes.

Evidently nobody has ever, since 1945 until 2015 been able to prove that sudden mechanical contact at high pressure of two masses of metal (Uranium-235, U235) together making up a critical mass in this collision will initiate a fission reaction, so a fission reaction begins… and that a bomb explodes … unless it is in a top secret scientific paper. Effective propaganda is always simple. How can anyone doubt the above nonsense? But you cannot compress an atom or a piece of metal by a collision. It just bounces.

 
3.2 Anyone, incl. Iran, can build a 4 400 kg heavy a-bomb … but it does not work

So the US a-bomb is not very complex or big – about 3 meters long with diameter 0.7 meter, but heavy – mass 4 400 kg!! Anyone can build it! But it doesn’t work. Full details of the physics behind the 4 400 kg is available in the top secret Los Alamos Primer.

Item A is a front nose lock nut (!!) attached to a 1″ (~2.54 cm) diameter main steel rod holding the 6 Uranium-235 metal (U235) target rings (item H) in place on top of a Tungsten-Carbide tamper plug (item F) and inside the 6.5″ (16.5 cm) inside diameter Tungsten-Carbide tamper cylinder sleeve (item I).

Each U235 target ring weighs ~5.08 kg, i.e. all 6 target rings weigh together ~30.5 kg.

A target ring has inside diameter ~2.54 cm (1″) and outside diameter ~11.8 cm (4.65″) and height ~2.57 cm (1.01″) and volume 268 cm3and weighs ~5.08 kg, because the density of the metal U235 is about 18.95 g/cm3.

Total height of the 6 target rings is 15.4 cm (6.06″).

If the front nose locknut (item A) is not secured, the target rings (item H) will drop off! And items B, C, F, G and I will be loose.

Item S is the 9 Uranium-235 metal (U235) projectile rings.

Each projectile ring weighs ~3.39 kg and has height 1.71 cm (0.67″).

The inside diameter is ~11.8 cm (4.65″) and the outside diameter is ~16.5 cm (6.5″) so the projectile rings can slide inside the cylinder sleeve – item I and the 6.5″ bore gun tube – item N. Total height of item S is 15.4 cm, i.e. same as item H. How the projectile rings (item S) and items T, U and W are secured inside the cylinder sleeve/gun tube and do not drop down by themselves is not clear! Nine projectile ringsweigh ~30.5 kg.

The target rings and projectile rings have combined (critical) mass 61 kg and volume 3 219 cm3 (a cube of Uranium-235 with side 14.77 cm) that will ‘explode’ when pushed together. Evidently two pieces of cold Uranium metal will not ‘explode‘ under any circumstances so what is supposed to happen according to the experts?

It is suggested that, at the same time the Uranium-235 rings are violently pushed together, four small Polonium-Beryllium ‘initiators’ (item G) are also compressed and broken. The Beryllium metal pieces (melting point 1 287°C) and the radioactive Polonium metal pieces (melting point 254°C) are initially separated by a Nickel and Gold sheathing absorbing any alpha particles He2+ from the Polonium. When violent compression occurs the sheathing is broken, we are told, and the solid Beryllium metal and solid Polonium metal pieces are mixed (!) producing free neutrons with 15 000 000 m/s speed (!) that in turn fission the compressed Uranium-235 rings = a-bomb explosion. You see, when you expose Beryllium to alpha particles each consisting of two protons and two neutrons fused together (like a Helium nucleus), the Beryllium releases neutrons at 15 000 000 m/s speed and becomes Carbon (LOL), while the Polonium becomes Lead. Ever heard of alchemy? It is an influential tradition whose practitioners have, from antiquity, claimed it to be the precursor to profound powers.

You should wonder why you have to compress anything to initiate the a-bomb but it is a national and atomic physics secret since 1945. Why not just remove the Nickel/Gold sheathing of the ‘initiator’ and let the alpha particles produce the fast or free neutrons that fission theUranium-235, etc.?

And why didn’t the a-bomb just explode anytime, when hit by a free neutron flying around?

A small natural neutron background flux of free neutrons exists on Earth all the time, caused by cosmic ray muons, and by the natural radioactivity of spontaneously fissionable elements in the Earth’s crust.

According John Coster-Mullen who has built his own a-bombs the nine stacked projectile rings of Uranium-235 metal (U235) should have a total mass of 38.531.12 grams, and the six stacked target rings of Uranium-235 metal (U235), should have a total mass of 25,616.44grams. Together that is 64,14756 kg which is not a critical mass of any kind.

The remaining mass of the bomb – 4 339 kg – is all the other lettered items seen above.

US Army designed it VERY HEAVY 1945! Why you need 4 339 kg of scrap to push 2 times 30.5 kg (or whatever?) of Uranium-235together is still a military secret 2015. National security, you know! Remember Klaus Fuchs!

Another fake drawing of the VERY HEAVY ‘Little Boy’ is shown right. The basic principle is the same but the details differ completely. This is normal when idiotic military hardware is used as propaganda. There is no Item A a front nose lock nut, etc.

Björkman a-bomb with 61 kg of Uranium-235 inside
 

 

3.3 The Björkman a-bomb – total weight 80 kg

It would evidently be much simpler to just have a 60 kg cube about 14.8*14.8*14.8 cm of Uranium-235 with a hole with an ‘initiator’, where you can inject a piece of 1 kg of Uranium-235 at a speed of >1.000 m/s using a little mechanical device, so it explodes, when critical mass 61 kg is suddenly reached. This mechanical device incl. 61 kg Uranium-235 weighs say 70 kg. Put it in a bag with weight 10 kg and you have a Björkman a-bomb (left) that only weighs 80 kg. Imagine that a little cube of Uranium-235 can explode in a little bag! Of course one 1 kg piece must be injected at a speed of >1.000 m/sinto the other 60 kg piece.

Fake drawing of ‘Little Boy’

Easier to handle than the stupid 4 400 kg monster allegedly used at Hiroshima. 

3.4 But you need Uranium-235 … and it is a little complicated

Uranium is a metal and doesn’t cost very much and is not rare. About 53 000 tons of Uraniumwere produced annually 2012.

A friend of mine at Freiberg, Saxony (East Germany/DDR until 1990) worked for Wismut AG,1948-1958, that produced 10.000 tons of Uranium for USSR to build a-bombs – or so they say. Those were the times. Wismut AG was a private company (in communist DDR!) 100% owned by the KGB(USSR secret intelligence/security agency) headed at the time by comrade Serov. KGB knew the US a-bomb was a fake as KGB had spies everywhere in the USA fooling FBI for years. So USSR produced their own communist a-bomb! It didn’t cost them a kopek. It was just proletarian propaganda. It was never built. Only propaganda films and photos of fake Soviet a-bombs were produced to impress the proletariat and put fear into the Americans.

Disc of U235 made in USA! Just drill a hole and … voilà … a ring! Then compress it, or just drop it on the floor!? … and BOOM!


One American, Paul Nitze, was behind the three most important reports that promoted the perception of a Soviet threat against the United States after World War II. The first of these reports, NSC68, was instrumental in changing the policy of the Truman Administration, which initially did not perceive the Soviets as a major threat. The second Nitze report was the Gaither Report that, in 1957, said the U.S. had fallen behind (!) the USSR in nuclear weaponry. Didn’t Nitze know that the USSR bomb was a propaganda hoax?It is suggested that only Uranium-235 (U235) can fission and that Uranium-235 (U235) makes up only 0.72% of normal Uranium metal and has to be separated from the remainder (mostly Uranium-238 (U238)) in special factories which makes such enriched Uranium-235 (U235) a little more expensive. A Uranium-235 (U235) atomic has three neutrons less than a Uranium-238 (U238) atomic. To, e.g., obtain 61 kg of pure, enriched Uranium-235 (U235) metal you need about 8 400 kg or 8.4 ton of Uranium to separate the Uranium-235 (U235) from. How to separate Uranium-235 (U235) from Uranium-238?

Well, one way is, Iranian style since many years, that you treat the Uranium with Fluorine, F, so it becomes a gas – UF6 – and then, in gas separators you separate the lighter U235 F6 molecules from the little (three neutrons) heavier U238 F6 molecules! And then you remove the fluorine again and have pure, metal Uranium-235 (U235). Voilà! Then you cast and machine the target rings and projectile rings ofUranium-235 (U235) in any workshop. Uranium-235 (U235) is a metal like iron that can be shaped into target rings and projectile rings. Imagine drilling a dia 1″ hole in a target ring. Aren’t you worried it will fission by itself by a neutron passing so it EXPLODEs? No – it must also be compressed! To double density! Very important.

It is, however 2012 – 67 years later, still TOP SECRET, what US factory managed to separate U235 from 10 tons of U238 by gas separation or whatever – magnetism? – and then making it, the U235, a 72 kg metal slab again and what workshop manufactured and drilled the U235 metal target rings and projectile rings in 1945! Reason apparently being that no such workshop or technology existed at that time, 1942-1945, and no rings were ever manufactured. Of course, there was Oak Ridge, TN, with 75 000 people but they didn’t know what they were doing.

Some people say Clinton Engineer Works, 20 miles west of Knoxville, TN, produced the rings using the calutron electromagnetic isotope separation (EMIS) process. Hundreds of thousands of magnetic type separators (!) driven by great amount of electricity were used by Clinton Engineer Works to produce some hundred kilograms of U235. Reason for so many separators was the relatively low product collection rate of the process and the long cycle time required to recover material between runs. The ringsand the separators would otherwise be nice atomic museum show pieces! But … it was all stupid PROPAGANDA! No U235 was ever produced and no separators existed!

Talking about atomic museums – there is one at Albuquerque, NM! It produces a lot of propaganda about US nuclear bombs and the nonsense done nearby 1945. It is supported by US Congress! Imagine that – a museum full of lies supported by the US Government. 2012! But Albuquerque is just an ugly, boring dump in the New Mexico desert with an annual hot air balloon show + plenty PhD’s living in the Rio Grande gutter.


3.5 Compress mechanically metal Uranium-235 and suddenly it explodes

According underpaid US scientists 1945 the a-bomb above exploded (!), when the 9 projectile rings (item S) of 30.5 kg Uranium-235 (U235) were mechanically pushed over and mechanicallycompressed into (?) the 6 target rings (item H) also of 30.5 kg Uranium-235 (U235) by the projectile Tungsten-Carbide disk (item T) at a speed of >1.000 m/s (according #20 of the Los Alamos Primer) and the projectile steel back (item U) in turn accelerated by exploding cordite power bags (item W). But you cannot compress an atom or a piece of metal by a collision. It just bounces.

At the same time the Uranium-235 rings are compressed together, four Polonium-Beryllium‘initiators’ (item G) are also compressed. The Beryllium and the radioactive Polonium are initially separated by sheathings of Nickel and Gold absorbing any alpha particles from the Polonium, but when sudden compression occurs the sheathings are broken and the solidBeryllium and solid Polonium are mixed or pressed together producing free neutrons (!) that at15.000.000 m/s speed (~3% of the speed of light) in turn fission the Uranium-235 rings = a-bomb explosion. That a free neutron flying around at 15.000.000 m/s speed didn’t explode the bomb earlier was good news for the bomber crew.

This took place 600 meters above ground, when the bomb itself was dropping vertically at 324.7m/s speed.

Why the 9 projectile rings did not drop by themselves by gravity is not clear. Maybe they were glued together and to the disk glued to the steel back?

So an a-bomb is very simple! Slide or drop or push (assisted by exploding cordite!) 9 Uranium-235 (U235) projectile rings over 6 Uranium-235 (U235) target rings and compress them together inside a Tungsten-Carbide tube (sleeve/disk/plug) a speed of >1.000 m/s, compress at the same time some Polonium-Beryllium ‘initiators’ and fission and … BOOM. Children died! And do not forget to tighten item A – the front nose locknut on the steel rod!

The first a-bomb explosion at 5.30 am, July 16, 1945, 0.016 seconds after detonation at about 20 meters above ground. The FIREBALL (?) is about 600 feet (200 m) wide. The black specks silhouetted along the horizon are trees. The picture, allegedly taken by a high speed, 64 fps (one frame every 0.0156 seconds), B/W film camera at a distance 10 000 yard away, is a simple fake! Like this video!Inside the fake FIREBALL is pure energy that have heated up split and unsplit Uranium atomics and the air to >1.000.000°C. The pressure inside thefireball is originally >1.000.000 bar, when it expands at great velocity in all directions … if you believe the nonsense. The sudden flash flies by at the speed of light!!!!
In this 1955 film you see a little (fake) a-bomb go off, so next day place is safe to visit and have a look at the damages! All nuke bomb films are fake! Russian, American, French, etc.

 

Above is evidently pure nonsense. Stupid, idiotic propaganda. It does not work! Metal in contact with metal, be it gold, silver, lead, iron, Uranium of any kind incl. Uranium-235 (U235) of any critical mass, do not fission exponentially and explode (initiated by a metallic Polonium-Beryllium mix producing free neutrons at 15.000.000 m/s speed) even after being mechanically compressed together at a speed of >1.000 m/s … suddenly.What is supposed to happen to initiate fission? The projectile rings and their steel back (items T and U) – say weight 50 kgs – accelerate down the 2 meters long tube in microseconds and collide with the impact absorbing anvil (item E) with a velocity of v – say v = 150 m/s, which is pretty high (more will blew the tube apart). The total energy applied at collision impact is 562.5 kJ and half of it is absorbed by the impact absorbing anvil (item E) trying to push the projectile rings and its steel back (item U) back up the tube. You know – objects also bounce, not just compress, at impacts. The remaining energy – 281.25 kJ – is supposed to radially compress mechanically the projectile rings and the target rings outwards (total 61 kg) and adjacent items (say also 61 kg) but 2.3 kJ/kg energy will not compress metal a lot in any direction. Compare energy required to destroy WTC 1/2!

You really wonder what idiot or nuclear physicist came up with this crazy idea that two pieces of cold metal (Uranium-235) mechanically compressed together using cordite would start to fission. Would really the two cold metal pieces merge into one? What really happens at the contact surface between the projectile rings and the target rings? Do the rings become one solid mass? And why would it explode? Free neutrons flying around from a Polonium-Beryllium mix?

 

3.6 Uranium-235 explodes if it has a critical mass

The blast wave and FIREBALL have apparently just hit ground stirring up some (fake) dust
The ‘experts’ have an answer to that. Critical mass! The critical mass is the smallest amount of fissile material needed for a sustained nuclear chain reaction. For Uranium-235, U235, the critical mass is 61 kg! If 30.5 kg of metal U235 projectile rings are brought in mechanical, compressive contact with 30.5 kg of metal U235 target rings they add up to 61 kg = critical mass! A 3.39 kg projectile ring in contact with a 5.08 kg target ring does not produce fission! Why? Because 3.39 + 5.08 = 8.47 kg is not a critical mass! On the other hand a sphere or ball of Uranium-235 with diameter 17 cm has a critical mass of only 52 kg. Or:

A mass may be exactly critical without being a perfect homogeneous sphere. More closely refining the shape toward a perfect sphere will make the mass supercritical. Conversely changing the shape to a less perfect sphere will decrease its reactivity and make it subcritical.

So a 52 kg sphere of Uranium-235 is a critical mass like 61 kg of rings ofUranium-235. atomic physics is just a big laugh. Military secret, of course.

In retrospect it would have been much easier to allow two 26 kg half-spheres of Uranium-235 to collide than to play around with projectile and target rings.And what damages are caused by cordite gases when the projectile rings or half-spheres have been pushed down the gun tube? Doesn’t the whole a-bomb assembly blow apart? LOL! OK, OK, it was never built! It was just a joke. Any photos of it were just photos of a mock-up! Military propaganda 1945 worth US$ 2 billion! LOL! And nuclear physicists supported by professor Wellerstein believe it 2016.

 

3.7 But only 0.1% of a Uranium-235 atomic becomes energy in an a-bomb

But I agree. One U235 Uranium atom may fission as discovered by Otto Hahn 1938. You do not have to mechanically compress Uraniummetal rings in a tube for it. In a peaceful atomic power plant there is no mechanic compression of Uranium atoms to keep the plant going.

When one U235 nucleus fissions into two lighter nuclei fragments or products (i.e. other atoms), about 0.1 percent of the mass of the Uranium nucleus appears as fission energy of 202.5 MeV … we are told (by some underpaid physicist?):

A. Typically ~169 MeV appears as the kinetic energy of the nuclei fragments (new atomics), which fly apart at about 3% of the speed of light, due to Coulomb repulsion.B. An average of 2.5 (*) neutrons are emitted, each with a kinetic energy of ~2 MeV (total of 4.8 MeV).

C. The fission reaction also releases ~7 MeV in prompt gamma ray photons (light).

D. 169 + 4.8 + 7 = 180.8. Where does the remaining 2O2.5 – 180.8 = 21.7 MeV energy go? Or is there a simple addition error?

Regardless, this means that a nuclear fission of one (!) atom emits about 3.5% of its energy as gamma rays, less than 2.5% of its energy as fast neutrons (total ~ 6%), and the rest as kinetic energy of fission fragments (this appears almost immediately when the fragments impact surrounding matter, e.g. water (?*) in an nuclear power station, as simple heat, where the reaction is controlled at a certain constant temperature).

(* Two or three neutrons are supposed to immediately fission two other U235 atoms – chain reaction! – but the energy 2 MeV is much too small … according same underpaid physicist! And evidently the fragments first impact surrounding U235 metal … and not water or air, i.e. the U235 metal piece is heated up first. If there is U238 Uranium in the bomb and a free neutron collides with it, it may become radioactive plutonium 238, which is very dangerous, we are told, etc, etc. )

Note that no matter is transformed into pure energy à la Einstein here. Only one atom is split into two other atoms – fragments – and some neutrons and gamma rays and as they are moving they represent kinetic energy.

However:

In an atomic bomb as described above (due to exponential chain reaction), this heat may serve to raise the temperature to 100 million K(Kelvin) and cause secondary emission of soft X-rays, which convert some of this energy to ionizing radiation.

This is utter nonsense. Less temperature will simply melt the Uranium-235 (U235) metal assembly that will flow or evaporate away. Therefore:

However in nuclear reactors, the fission fragment kinetic energyremains as low-temperature heat, which itself causes little or no ionization.

It is the speed of the neutron, when it hits the nucleus that has a lot to do with how likely a fission is to occur. One might think, intuitively, that if the neutron is going really fast that it has a better chance of “shattering” the nucleus, but that’s not really how it works. Actually, for the fissile nuclei such U235 the SLOWER the neutron is going, the more probable fission is.

So slowed-down neutrons to maximize fission are an absolute requirement. And then from fission comes more neutrons, which continue the reaction. Well, mostly right. Actually, the neutrons born from fission are going really fast. Really, really fast. And they have to slow down ~10.000 times to have a good chance of causing fission. That’s where the moderator comes in.

The moderator in a nuclear reactor is the material whose job it is to slow down neutrons without absorbing them. This slowing-down is done by neutrons bouncing off the nuclei of the atomics in the moderating material. For most reactors, moderation takes place in thewater that also cools the reactor.

Great Britain detonated its first nuclear bomb May 15, 1957 – and it looked like above … photo by some unknown hero.Doesn’t the flash or FIREBALL look … fine, fantastic, … fake? But where is the blast wave?
 

For a high-temperature reactor like the liquid-fluoride reactor, graphite (carbon) is used as the moderator. This was not really known in the1940’s when the a-bomb was said to have been invented.It is thus the moderated free neutrons that keep the fission going in a peaceful nuclear power reactor by heating the water. The 2 MeV kinetic energy of a free neutron becomes 0.01 MeV kinetic energy and the rest – 1.99 MeV – heats up the water. Fission also takes place naturally in the Earth’s core and keeps it warm … so that volcanoes can erupt and continents can move, etc. But in 1945 it was …

 

3.8 … only 1.5% of the Uranium-235 critical mass exploded or fissioned in an a-bomb

we are told by the 1945 a-bomb engineers and manufacturers. Fission was made manageable 1939 and 1945 everything was known about it by clever scientists we are told … but made top secret for military and national security reasons. How convenient.

How many U235 atoms are there in a 61 kg a-bomb described above? The answer is that there are about 4×1026 U235 atoms in a little, 16.5 cm diameter, 15.4 cm high, 61 kg (critical mass, LOL) U235 a-bomb two parts core, i.e. quite a lot of U235 atoms in the metal target ringsand projectile rings.

Only 1.5% of the 4×1026 U235 atoms, i.e. 6×1024 atoms are, according to unproven research 1944/5, supposed to absorb one neutron and become U236 atoms that fission during a few nanoseconds to produce an a-bomb pure energy release explosion FLASH according some strange, unproven theory.

98.5% of the U235 atoms do not fission as the free neutrons miss them and fly away, we are supposed to believe. Imagine that! 98.5%. Why not 100%? 

Fake photo of fake US a-bomb explosion FIREBALL without blast wave
So the following is supposed to happen in a U235 exponential chain reaction atomic explosion after two pieces of cold metal U235 are compressed together:

1. One metal U235 atom of total 4×1026 atoms absorbs one neutron and becomes an U236 atom that fissions and is split into two fragments of some kind at high speed (3% of the speed of light) and two or three free neutrons (also at high speed) due to mechanical compression. It is supposed this happen in the interface between the projectile rings and the target rings.

2. The two or three free neutrons miss 120-150 metal U235 atoms in the vicinity because the nuclei are very small compared to the atomic itself but still manage to collide with 2 or 3 U235 nuclei that become U236 atoms that fission in turn and split into more fragments and another 2 or 3 neutrons that again miss 120-150 U235 atoms in the vicinity but manage to collide with 2 or 3 U235 nuclei, and so on until only 6×1024 U235 atoms (1.5% of total) have become 6×1024 U236 atoms that fissioned during a few nanoseconds chain reaction.

3. The temperature increases >1 000 000° C and produces a white FLASH and a SHOCK WAVE and the energy heats the surrounding air over several kilometres that produces a FIREBALL that then rises to form a dirty black (or white?)MUSHROOM CLOUD.4. The pressure increases 1 000 000 bar due to pure, white or blue, invisible energy (kinetic energy of the fragments) being released forming a SHOCK WAVE that destroys the surroundings (except the Bank of Japan building and similar strong buildings) and plenty noise.

5. Above only happens, if the total mass of the two cold metal pieces being mechanically compressed is critical. No moderator is required according to professor Wellerstein 2015 because “you use 80-90% enriched material in a bomb”, so probability is high to hit some of the 4×1026atomic cores and split them before they all fly away due to fission of previous cores.

Regarding the photos of a-bomb explosions shown above, Wellerstein thinks they are all real (in email to me 4 February 2015):

“Similarly I do not think you have really considered the difficulty of faking footage and photographs of nuclear weapons. Even today, with advanced CGI, making something that looks compelling is non-trivially difficult. In the 1940s and 1950s it would have been impossible. Theclouds in question are so much larger than those produced by conventional explosives — they are on the order of clouds produced by only immense releases of energy. The radioactive effluents produced by the megaton-range detonations in the 1950s were detectable by independent scientists all over the world. The size of the energy release that creates a cloud can be calculated roughly in retrospect should you ever be interested — nuclear detonations above the surface of the ground are always characterized by an uncommonly bright FLASH (a “double flash,” technically), and the size of the fireball, its rate of rise, and ultimate top altitude correlates very strongly with its energy release. That this should be true is fairly obvious from a first-principles analysis of the movement of very hot gasses through the atmosphere. The fact of the heavy “anvilling” of late-stage multi-megaton mushroom clouds, caused by their reaching (and sometimes breaching) the troposphere, is evidence of their great explosive output. Conventional explosives simply cannot reach temperatures that would allow them to do such a thing.”

Why a dirty MUSHROOM CLOUD of any type or color or a FIREBALL hanging around in the sky is supposed to develop … except on fake footage to impress stupid onlookers … is not really clear. Hot air ball of fire rising?

If there are U238 nuclei mixed with the U235 nuclei, the neutron may transform the former into plutonium + radiation, i.e. the U238 nuclei are not split into fragments but transformed into another substance.

That the fragments (heat) do not melt the 4×1026 nuclei metal core is that fission goes faster than melting, we are told, etc, etc, bla, bla.

However, when the first (and only?) nucleus of 4×1026 U235 nuclei in the above bomb fissions (it is split by free neutrons from somewhere – the Polonium-Beryllium initiators?), it will only heat the surrounding as it is not cooled and the 2.5 free neutrons will just fly away and produce nothing with their 2 MeV energy each. They cannot possibly collide with and fission anything. They must be moderated to produce further fission like in an atomic power plant or in the Earth’s core.

The 4 x 1026 minus 1 remaining nuclei in the little dia 16.5 cm, 15.4 cm tall chunk of U235 metal target/projectile rings will therefore not fission further. The bomb does not work! It always fizzles! Unless the cordite blows the whole thing apart and some innocent bystander gets a target ring or projectile ring in the face?

 

3.9 Fission fizzle

Carey Sublette, self-appointed nuclear expert (!), has a very stupid explanation of fission fizzle:

“Two conditions must be met before fission can be used to create powerful explosions:1) the number of neutrons lost to fission (from non-fission producing neutron captures, or escape from the fissionable mass) must be kept low, and

2) the speed with which the chain reaction proceeds must be very fast.

A fission bomb is in a race with itself: to successfully fission most of the material in the bomb before it blows itself apart. The degree to which a bomb design succeeds in this race determines its efficiency. A poorly designed or malfunctioning bomb may “fizzle” and release only a tiny fraction of its potential energy.”

Apparently this is a clever design:

It was never tested anywhere and exploded when dropped on Hiroshima. It didn’t fizzle … you must believe. W exploded, S was suddenly pushed down N over H and fission occurred … because A was locked tight! The free neutrons made the rest … at the speed of light! But not in this bomb!

 

3.10 Only fools believe that metal in mechanical contact with metal explodes

Only fools like Mr. R Oppenheimer (a.k.a. Robert O. Lyssenko) and badly informed people like most politicians believe that Uranium-235metal in mechanical contact with Uranium-235 metal in the shape of target rings or projectile rings … or any metal in mechanical contact with itself – will produce … an atomic explosion: that 4×1026 or 6×1024 metal U235 nuclei in some Uranium-235 (U235) target rings orprojectile rings fission exponentially in nanoseconds into fragments and release pure energy in a FLASH is just fantasy, I am happy to inform! It was a fizzle.

Oppenheimer & Co. also invented the plutonium-239 a-bomb that was dropped on Nagasaki 9 August 1945. It looked something like:

 

Here two non-critical half spheres of pure metal plutonium-239 total mass of which is critical – are kept apart by a mysterious divider(not shown in above picture) to prevent the bomb to explode by itself in a FLASH, if a free neutron passes by. The two metal spheres and the divider are suspended in a vacuum space by aluminium wires (not shown in above picture). The vacuum space is surrounded by aneutron reflector enclosing the two plutonium half spheres and the divider. Wedge shaped high explosive charges surround the plutonium half spheres. By detonating the explosive charges, the neutron reflector, the two half spheres and the mysterious divider are compressed and the a-bomb explodes. The purpose of the neutron reflector is to ensure that the neutrons released by mechanic contact do not fly away but bounce back into the compressed half spheres of pure metal plutonium-239.

What a stupid joke. Who came up with this ridiculous idea? And how is that people believe these lies 2016?

Oppenheimer, the alleged master mind of the fake Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs, apparently thought it was all a joke. That nobody would get killed by the massive napalm carpet bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. But later propaganda suggests otherwise:

“The day the bomb dropped, (Oppenheimer) betrayed no hint of regret: Oppenheimer and his team were, in fact, jubilant. In the vast atomic compound at Los Alamos, they had gathered to celebrate the success of the bombing mission. Oppenheimer made a triumphant entrance on to the stage, clasping his hands together like a prize-fighter while everybody cheered. His only regret, he said, was that they hadn’t developed the bomb in time to use it against the Germans. This apparently ‘raised the roof’.”Churchill was equally gratified. ‘The whole burden of execution constitutes one of the greatest triumphs of American – or indeed human – genius,’ he said.

Sad story. Imagine bombing 100 000’s of innocent civilians in big cities and people cheer. Sounds like blind, stupid terrorism!

 

 

3.11 Psychological shock

Better demonstrate what you know, e.g. over Tokyo Bay, where millions can watch … and nobody gets hurt.

But in preparation for dropping an a-bomb on Hiroshima, US military leaders decided against a demonstration bomb, and against a special leaflet warning, in both cases because of the uncertainty of a successful detonation, and the wish to maximizepsychological shock. No warning was given to Hiroshima that a new and much more destructive bomb was going to be dropped.

US terrorist napalm bombing leaflet – what would a Japanese do reading it?

 

3.12 Japan is a nice country … and no a-bombs exploded there

I worked May 1972 – November 1976 and lived at Yokohama on the Bluff with a great view of Tokyo Bay to the south and Mount Fuji to the west. Two of my colleagues were children at Hiroshima and Nagasaki 1945. They never experienced any a-bombings. Just conventional B-29 napalm carpet terror bombings! Japan was occupied by USA until 1952 and censorship and propaganda produced the ridiculous falsifications of history known as the a-bombs (and other things). What Japanese children really experienced 1945 was ignored and overlooked. Grown up Japanese were just told to shut up and believe the US propaganda nonsense. When I arrived at Yokohama the central Naka-ku area between Yamate and Yokohama stations looked as if it had been napalm saturated bombed a little earlier. But it was 27 years ago, May 1945, three months before general MacArthur arrived and witnessed the destruction. But you could not talk about it 27 years later.

 

3.13 A-bomb testing … by underpaid, summer working, stupid American and British students

San Antonio is about 28 miles from Trinity Site, where the first nuclear bomb was detonated on July 16, 1945. The fireball looks like smoke – but let’s face it. The photo is a fake

But wasn’t an a-bomb tested in the dark early morning at 04.00 am at Alamogordo, NM, USA July 16, 1945 as reported by L. R. GROVESMajor General, USA, and seen on plenty films made? Whatever was tested in New Mexico that morning you can read about in the ridiculous test report Trinity written by a Mr. K. T. Bainbridge and some assistants. It was not the bomb described above. The report is simply a joke like the 18 low quality, stupid References made before and after the alleged July 16th Nuclear Explosion, by authors some of which later became physics university professors or Nobel prize winners that could never explain how an a-bomb actually worked (due to national security reasons):

1. R. W. Carlson “Confinement of an Explosion by a Steel Vessel,” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LA-XXI (September 1945).2. J. H. Manley “July 16th Nuclear Explosion: Micro-Barograph Pressure Measurement, ” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LA-360 (September 1945).

3. J. L. McKibhen “July 16th Nuclear Explosion: Relating Timing, ” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LA-435 (1947).

4. E. W. Titterton “July 16th Nuclear Explosion: Fast Electronic Timing Sequence,” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LA-436 (April 1946). (… he (E.W. Titterton) gained fame as having ‘pushed the button’ to initiate the first atomic bomb test at Alamogordo, the consequences of his time at Los Alamos were more profound. It made him a member of an old boys’ network of virtually every leading nuclear physicist, both experimental and theoretical, in the Western world. Most of them had lived and worked in an isolated, close knit community for a number of years. …).

5. H. A. Bethe, Ed., “Los Alamos Technical Series. Vol. 7 ‘Blast Wave,’ Part I (Chaps. 1-4),” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LA-102O (August 1947). ( … Bethe was sceptical of the possibility of making a nuclear weapon from Uranium. In the late 1930s, he wrote a theoretical paper arguing against fission, but was convinced by Teller to join the Manhattan Project. When Oppenheimer was put in charge of forming a secret weapons design laboratory, Los Alamos, he appointed Bethe Director of the Theoretical Division, a move that irked Teller, who had coveted the job for himself. Bethe’s work at Los Alamos included calculating the critical mass of Uranium-235 and the multiplication of nuclear fission in an exploding atomic bomb. …)6. Ernest D. Klema, “July 16th Nuclear Explosion: Fast-Neutron Measurements Using Sulfur as the Detector,” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LA-361 (October 1945).

7. Ernest D. Klema, “July 16th Nuclear Explosion: Neutron Measurements with Gold-Foil Detectors,” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LA-362 (October 1945).

8. R. Bellman and R. E. Marshak “Distribution Arising from a Point Source of Fast Neutrons between Two Slowing-Down Media, ” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LA-257 (April 1945). (Marshak received his PhD from Cornell University in 1939. Along with his thesis advisor, Hans Bethe, he discovered many of the fusion aspects involved in star formation. This helped him on his work for the Manhattan Project, in Los Alamos, during World War II.)

9. R. E. Marshak “JuIy 16th Nuclear Explosion: Soil Correction, Absorption of Neutrons in Soil, and Time Dependence of Slow-Neutron Intensity. ” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LA-358 (January 1946).

10. J. Hirschfelder, R. Kamm, J. L. Magee, and N. Sugarman “Fate of the Active Material After a Nuclear Explosion, ” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LA-277 (August 1945).

11. P. Aebersold and P. B. Moon “JuIy 16th Nuclear Explosion: Radiation Survey of Trinity Site Four Weeks After Explosion, ” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LA-359 (September 1945). (Dr. Aebersold was at t Los Alamos to assist in the health problems in connection with the atomic bomb test. He participated in protection of personnel during the assembling and testing of the bomb and made extensive radiation measurements after the test. 24 hours after the alleged explosion, you could visit the site without risk. During World War II P. B. Moon was part of the MAUD Committee that confirmed the feasibility of an atomic bomb and then became part of the British delegation to the Manhattan Project, where amongst other things he did work on designing instrumentation for measuring the eventual bomb test).

12. D. Williams and P. Yuster “July 16th Nuclear Explosion: Total Radiation,” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LA-353 (August 1945).

13. J. E. Mack and F. Geiger Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, personal communication.

14. F. Reines and W. G. Marley “July 16th Nuclear Explosion: Incendiary Effects of Radiation, ” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LA-364 (1945).

15. I. Halpern and P. B. Moon, “July 16th Nuclear Explosion: Attempt to Obtain Gamma-Ray Kinephotographs, ” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LA-430 (November 1945).

16. J. E. Mack, “July 16th Nuclear Explosion: Space-Time Relationships, ” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LA-531 (April 1946).

17. J. E. Mack “Semi-Popular Motion Picture Record of the Trinity Explosion,’” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory” report LAMS-373 (April 1946).

18. J. Blair, D. Frisch, and S. Katcoff, “Detection of Nuclear-Explosion Dust in the Atmosphere,” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LA-418 (October 1945).

 

3.14 No scientific evidence that an atomic device can explode = good news!

There is no scientific evidence anywhere in above reports or anywhere by any Nobel Prize winners that an atomic device of any kind exploded in New Mexico July 16, 1945 due to mechanical, compressive contact! The Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory was just a military camp to produce disinformation in war by underpaid physicists and students. Who invented the above ‘bomb’ is not known. Some student?

Basic physics in a civilian laboratory on the other hand confirms that an a-bomb does not work at all. Prove me wrong and win €1 000 000:- . Reason is very simple. The free neutrons released at fission are too fast and cannot fission another atomic. A free neutron can only fission another atomic in a peaceful atomic power plant after being moderated, i.e. slowed down. You cannot moderate or slow down free neutrons in an a-bomb.

The stupid US 3 meters long thing right never even existed except as an empty dummy on fake photos! I know there are 1 000’s of web sites, e.g. this one, and this one, andthis one, suggesting the a-bomb works but … they all produce false info and propaganda. It is a very lucrative business paid for by ignorant tax payers. And any country can become an a-bomb power! Just say you have the bomb. It doesn’t cost much. Anyunderpaid nuclear physicist will agree to anything for a pay rise (as happened at Los Alamos in New Mexico, 1945).

And the other a-bomb powers and their ‘experts’will not say anything. National, military security reasons, you know! You have to be politically correct! Today, 2015, all US a-bombs are allegedly manufactured at the Pantex Plant, at Amarillo, TX, USA, that is operated byConsolidated Nuclear Security, LLC (CNS) company from 1 July 2014.

It is a strange place (right) in the middle of nowhere … where nobody but well paid guards work!

So maybe the USA is neither producing new, nor deactivating old a-bombs that never worked in the first place? Isn’t it good news!

Luckily fission works only in peaceful, nuclear power plants and in civilian laboratories due to moderated free neutrons.

Pantex Plant a-bomb making factory at Amarillo, Texas, USA – Source – where nobody seems to work.
 

 

3.15 Only risk is overheating and melting of the metal and surroundings

In a power plant the Uranium U235 is in the form of an oxide (a molecule) where the U235 part may fission and produce heat under controlled forms. Nocritical masses!

No exponential chain reactions. It can never explode. Only risk is overheating of the environment due to lack of cooling water Fukushima style.

Then the reactor enclosure will burst and its bottom may drop out (melt) and some radioactive elements will leak out.

Pantex Plant a-bomb making factory sports field at Amarillo, Texas, USA, where nobody ever runs around


Safety then is simply to ensure that cooling water is always available and that the bottoms of the reactors are STRONG. Quite simple actually. You should wonder why the Pantex Plant a-bomb factory built a sports field in the middle of nowhere (above). Maybe because nobody has ever run there?

 

3.16 An exponential chain reaction is not possible – Congratulations Iran, sorry or be happy Israel

In a civilian laboratory like SCK-CEN any heavy, radioactive, dangerous element can be bombarded by free neutrons and split into less hazardous, lighter elements as in normal fission, but you need to apply external energy for the fission.

A Uranium-235 (U235) exponential chain reaction is not possible. The a-bomb doesn’t work. Just ask SCK-CEN. Congratulations, Iran! Your bomb will never work! Sorry, Israel! Your bomb doesn’t work.

Safety at Sea is more complex! But there are ‘experts’ there too to produce false or pseudo scientific reports!

 

4.1 Recommended videos

How to make atomic bomb propaganda

How to prepare the ground for an atomic bomb in Japan

NUCLEAR WEAPONS DO NOT EXIST The Documentary By Edmund Matthews http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jo7Ytg9ckC0&feature=c4-overview&list=UU9y1hfjdOMBboMgC8BE70UA

 

Update 9 October 2012

5.1 Iran could make the a-bomb within 10 months: experts:

“Iran could produce enough weapons-grade Uranium (WGU) to make an atomic bomb within two to four months and then would need an additional eight to 10 months to build the device, experts said Monday 8 October 2012.”

The experts are paid by the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS), a non-profit, non-partisan institution dedicated to informing the public about science and policy issues affecting international security and the report is IRAN’S EVOLVING BREAKOUT POTENTIAL by William C. Witt, Christina Walrond, David Albright, and Houston Wood: 

“The authors use one significant quantity (SQ), defined as 25 kilograms of WGU (Weapon Grade Uranium), to represent the amount of WGU needed for a nuclear weapon. … Currently, ISIS assesses that Iran would require at least 2-4 months to produce one SQ of WGU at the Natanz Fuel Enrichment Plant and would need to utilize its stocks of 3.5 and near 20 percent LEU. The quickest estimates are 2 to 2.3 months, and they rely on an amount of near 20 percent LEU hexafluoride that was scheduled for conversion to another form as of August 2012. Growth in the stock of near 20 percent LEU reduces the time needed to break out, even though this stock is not currently large enough on its own to produce one SQ.”

ISIS thinks Iran can produce an a-bomb within 10 months and has apparently not read my article above why an a-bomb doesn’t work.

 

Anders Björkman

Heiwa Co home page

 

6.1 Addendum 1

As an a-bomb or h-bomb doesn’t work it is interesting to note the enormous amounts of $ money, missiles, launch pads, war heads and persons involved to keep the US hoax alive. If that money is or was really spent or just another hoax, is another matter. It is a fact that no a-bomb has ever accidentally exploded due to human failures or mistakes when maintaining, transporting or upgrading them. Evidently you need some money/persons to keep the hoax going:

– Except where noted all figures are in constant 1996 dollars –

1. Cost of the Manhattan Project (through August 1945): $20,000,000,000

SOURCE: Richard G. Hewlett and Oscar E. Anderson, Jr., The New World: A History of the United States atomic Energy Commission, Volume 1, 1939/1946 (Oak Ridge, Tennessee: U.S. AEC Technical Information centre, 1972), pp. 723-724; Condensed AEC Annual Financial Report, FY 1953 (in Fifteenth Semiannual Report of the atomic Energy Commission, January 1954, p. 73)

2. Total number of nuclear missiles built, 1951-present: 67,500

SOURCE: U.S. Nuclear Weapons Cost Study Project

3. Estimated construction costs for more than 1,000 ICBM launch pads and silos, and support facilities, from 1957-1964: nearly $14,000,000,000

SOURCE: Maj. C.D. Hargreaves, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Ballistic Missile Construction Office (CEBMCO), “Introduction to the CEBMCO Historical Report and History of the Command Section, Pre-CEBMCO Thru December 1962,” p. 8; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Ballistic Missile Construction Office, “U.S. Air Force ICBM Construction Program,” undated chart (circa 1965)

4. Total number of nuclear bombers built, 1945-present: 4,680

SOURCE: U.S. Nuclear Weapons Cost Study Project

5. Peak number of nuclear warheads and bombs in the stockpile/year: 32,193/1966

SOURCE: Natural Resources Defence Council, Nuclear Weapons Data book Project

6. Total number and types of nuclear warheads and bombs built, 1945-1990: more than 70,000/65 types

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Energy; Natural Resources Defence Council, Nuclear Weapons Data book Project

7. Number currently in the stockpile (2002): 10,600 (7,982 deployed, 2,700 hedge/contingency stockpile)

SOURCE: Natural Resources Defence Council, Nuclear Weapons Data book Project

8. Number of nuclear warheads requested by the Army in 1956 and 1957: 151,000

SOURCE: History of the Custody and Deployment of Nuclear Weapons, July 1945 Through September 1977, Prepared by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defence (atomic Energy), February 1978, p. 50 (formerly Top Secret)

9. Projected operational U.S. strategic nuclear warheads and bombs after full enactment of the Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty in 2012: 1,700-2,200

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Defence; Natural Resources Defence Council, Nuclear Weapons Data book Project

10. Additional strategic and non-strategic warheads not limited by the treaty that the U.S. military wants to retain as a “hedge” against unforeseen future threats: 4,900

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Defence; Natural Resources Defence Council, Nuclear Weapons Data book Project

11. Largest and smallest nuclear bombs ever deployed: B17/B24 (~42,000 lbs., 10-15 megatons); W54 (51 lbs., .01 kilotons, .02 kilotons-1 kiloton)

SOURCE: Natural Resources Defence Council, Nuclear Weapons Data book Project

12. Peak number of operating domestic Uranium mines (1955): 925

SOURCE: Nineteenth Semiannual Report of the atomic Energy Commission, January 1956, p. 31

13. Fissile material produced: 104 metric tons of plutonium and 994 metric tons of highly-enriched Uranium

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Energy

14. Amount of plutonium still in weapons: 43 metric tons

SOURCE: Natural Resources Defence Council, Nuclear Weapons Data book Project

15. Number of thermometers which could be filled with mercury used to produce lithium-6 at the Oak Ridge Reservation: 11 billion

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Energy

16. Number of dismantled plutonium “pits” stored at the Pantex Plant in Amarillo, Texas: 12,067 (as of May 6, 1999)

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Energy

17. States with the largest number of nuclear weapons (in 1999): New Mexico (2,450), Georgia (2,000), Washington (1,685), Nevada (1,350), and North Dakota (1,140)

SOURCE: William M. Arkin, Robert S. Norris, and Joshua Handler, Taking Stock: Worldwide Nuclear Deployments 1998 (Washington, D.C.: Natural Resources Defence Council, March 1998)

18. Total known land area occupied by U.S. nuclear weapons bases and facilities: 15,654 square miles

SOURCE: U.S. Nuclear Weapons Cost Study Project

19. Total land area of the District of Columbia, Massachusetts, and New Jersey: 15,357 square miles

SOURCE: Rand McNally Road Atlas and Travel Guide, 1992

20. Legal fees paid by the Department of Energy to fight lawsuits from workers and private citizens concerning nuclear weapons production and testing activities, from October 1990 through March 1995: $97,000,000

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Energy

21. Money paid by the State Department to Japan following fallout from the 1954 “Bravo” test: $15,300,000

SOURCE: Barton C. Hacker, Elements of Controversy: The atomic Energy Commission and Radiation Safety in Nuclear Weapons Testing, 1947-1974, University of California Press, 1994, p. 158

22. Money and non-monetary compensation paid by the United States to Marshallese Islanders since 1956 to redress damages from nuclear testing: at least $759,000,000

SOURCE: U.S. Nuclear Weapons Cost Study Project

23. Money paid to U.S. citizens under the Radiation Exposure and Compensation Act of 1990, as of January 13, 1998: approximately $225,000,000 (6,336 claims approved; 3,156 denied)

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Justice, Torts Branch, Civil Division

24. Total cost of the Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion (ANP) program, 1946-1961: $7,000,000,000

SOURCE: “Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion Program,” Report of the Joint Committee on atomic Energy, September 1959, pp. 11-12

25. Total number of nuclear-powered aircraft and airplane hangars built: 0 and 1

SOURCE: Ibid; “American Portrait: ANP,” WFAA-TV (Dallas), 1993. Between July 1955 and March 1957, a specially modified B-36 bomber made 47 flights with a three megawatt air-cooled operational test reactor (the reactor, however, did not power the plane).

26. Number of secret Presidential Emergency Facilities built for use during and after a nuclear war: more than 75

SOURCE: Bill Gulley with Mary Ellen Reese, Breaking Cover, Simon and Schuster, 1980, pp. 34- 36

27. Currency stored until 1988 by the Federal Reserve at its Mount Pony facility for use after a nuclear war: more than 2,000,000,000

SOURCE: Edward Zuckerman, The Day After World War III, The Viking Press, 1984, pp. 287-88

28. Amount of silver in tons once used at the Oak Ridge, TN, Y-12 Plant for electrical magnet coils: 14,700

SOURCE: Vincent C. Jones, Manhattan: The Army and the Bomb, U.S. Army centre for Military History, 1985, pp. 66-7

29. Total number of U.S. nuclear weapons tests, 1945-1992: 1,030 (1,125 nuclear devices detonated; 24 additional joint tests with Great Britain)

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Energy

30. First and last test: July 16, 1945 (“Trinity”) and September 23, 1992 (“Divider”)

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Energy

31. Estimated amount spent between October 1, 1992 and October 1, 1995 on nuclear testing activities: $1,200,000,000 (0 tests)

SOURCE: U.S. Nuclear Weapons Cost Study Project

32. Cost of 1946 Operation Crossroads weapons tests (“Able” and “Baker”) at Bikini Atoll: $1,300,000,000

SOURCE: Weisgall, Operation Crossroads, pp. 294, 371

33. Largest U.S. atomic explosion/date: 15 Megatons/March 1, 1954 (“Bravo”)

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Energy

34. Number of islands in Enewetak atoll vaporized by the November 1, 1952 “Mike” h-bomb test: 1

SOURCE: Chuck Hansen, U.S. Nuclear Weapons: The Secret History, Orion Books, 1988, pp. 58-59, 95

35. Number of nuclear tests in the Pacific: 106

SOURCE: Natural Resources Defence Council, Nuclear Weapons Data book Project

36. Number of U.S. nuclear tests in Nevada: 911

SOURCE: Natural Resources Defence Council, Nuclear Weapons Data book Project

37. Number of nuclear weapons tests in Alaska [1, 2, and 3], Colorado [1 and 2], Mississippi and New Mexico [1, 2 and 3]: 10

SOURCE: Natural Resources Defence Council, Nuclear Weapons Data book Project

38. Operational naval nuclear propulsion reactors vs. operational commercial power reactors (in 1999): 129 vs. 108

SOURCE: Adm. Bruce De Mars, Deputy Assistant Director for Naval Reactors, U.S. Navy; Nuclear Regulatory Commission

39. Number of attack (SSN) and ballistic missile (SSBN) submarines (2002): 53 SSNs and 18 SSBNs

SOURCE: Adm. Bruce De Mars, Deputy Assistant Director for Naval Reactors, U.S. Navy

40. Number of high level radioactive waste tanks in Washington, Idaho and South Carolina: 239

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Energy

41. Volume in cubic meters of radioactive waste resulting from weapons activities: 104,000,000

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Energy; Institute for Energy and Environmental Research

42. Number of designated targets for U.S. weapons in the Single Integrated Operational Plan (SIOP) in 1976, 1986, and 1995: 25,000 (1976), 16,000 (1986) and 2,500 (1995)

SOURCE: Bruce Blair, Senior Fellow, The Brookings Institution

43. Cost of January 17, 1966 nuclear weapons accident over Palomares, Spain (including two lost planes, an extended search and recovery effort, waste disposal in the U.S. and settlement claims): $182,000,000

SOURCE: Joint Committee on atomic Energy Interoffice Memorandum, February 15, 1968; centre for Defence Information

44. Number of U.S. nuclear bombs lost in accidents and never recovered: 11

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Defence; Centre for Defence Information; Greenpeace; “Lost Bombs,” Atwood-Keeney Productions, Inc., 1997

45. Number of Department of Energy federal employees (in 1996): 18,608

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Worker and Community Transition

46. Number of Department of Energy contractor employees (in 1996): 109,242

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Worker and Community Transition

47. Minimum number of classified pages estimated to be in the Department of Energy’s possession (1995): 280 million

SOURCE: A Review of the Department of Energy Classification Policy and Practice, Committee on Declassification of Information for the Department of Energy Environmental Remediation and Related Programs, National Research Council, 1995, pp. 7-8, 68.

48. Ballistic missile defence spending in 1965 vs. 1995: $2,200,000,000 vs. $2,600,000,000

SOURCE: U.S. Nuclear Weapons Cost Study Project

49. Average cost per warhead to the U.S. to help Kazakhstan dismantle 104 SS-18 ICBMs carrying more than 1,000 warheads: $70,000

SOURCE: U.S. Nuclear Weapons Cost Study Project; Arms Control Association

50. Estimated 1998 spending on all U.S. nuclear weapons and weapons-related programs: $35,100,000,000

SOURCE: U.S. Nuclear Weapons Cost Study Project

 

6.2 Addendum 2

According the Titan II Handbookthe US Titan II missile can since 1960 deliver A or h-bombs (that evidently do not work) from an underground silo in USA (there are 1 600 silos, we are told) to targets in USSR/Russia by sending it up into a parabolic curve above Earth. The strong missile will lob the bomb1.300.000 meter up into the exosphere (see right) from where it later drops down on USSR/Russia at an arrival, vertical velocity >7 000 m/s at 140.000 m altitude.

With that vertical speed the missile will hit ground after only 20 seconds.

The purpose is to steer the bombs on towns and other targets to kill 60% of the Russian population!

The bomb will never reach any target in USSR/RUSSIA though.

It will burn up in the mesosphere as explained here.

Titan II rockets are also good to send satellites into orbits around Earth at 400.000 m altitude and 7 000 m/s horizontal velocity and these satellites will never come down at all. They will just continue to orbit forever.

It would appear the US ICBM system is 100% useless.

 

6.3 Addendum 3 – A-BOMB HYSTERIA

By Major Alexander P. de Seversky

Author of “Victory Through Air Power,” etc.

(READER’S DIGEST, February 1946, pages 121 to 126)

As Special Consultant to the Secretary of War, Judge Robert P. Patterson, I spent nearly eight months intensively studying war destruction in Europe and Asia. I became thoroughly familiar with every variety of damage – from high explosives, incendiaries, artillery shells, dynamite, and combinations of these.

In this study, I inspected Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the targets of our atom bomb, examining the ruins, interrogating eyewitnesses and taking hundreds of pictures.

It was my considered opinion, I told correspondents in Tokyo, that the effects of the atom bombs – not of future bombs, but of these two – had been wildly exaggerated. If dropped on New York or Chicago, one of those bombs would have done no more damage than a ten-ton blockbuster; and the results in Hiroshima and Nagasaki could have been achieved by about 200 B-29’s loaded with incendiaries, except that fewer Japanese would have been killed. I did not “underrate” atom bombs or dispute their future potential. I merely conveyed my professional findings on the physical results of the two bombs – and they happened to be in startling contrast to the hysterical imaginative versions spread through the world.

My findings were pounced upon in outraged anger by all sorts of people, in the press, on the air, at public forums; and by scientists who haven’t been within 5000 miles of Hiroshima. But the violence of this reaction cannot alter the facts on view in the two Japanese cities.

I began my study of Japan by flying over Yokohama, Nagoya, Osaka, Kobe, and dozens of other places. Later I visited them all on foot.

All presented the same pattern. The bombed areas looked pinkish – an effect produced by the piles of ashes and rubble mixed with rusted metal. Modern buildings and factories still stood. That many of the buildings were gutted by fire was not apparent from the air. The centre of Yokohama, for instance, seemed almost intact when viewed from an airplane. The long industrial belt stretching from Osaka to Kobe had been laid waste by fire, but the factories and other concrete structures were still standing. On the whole it was a picture quite different from what I had seen in German cities subjected to demolition bombardment. The difference lay in the fact that Japanese destruction was overwhelmingly incendiary, with comparatively little structural damage to inflammable targets.

In Hiroshima I was prepared for radically different sights. But, to my surprise, Hiroshima looked exactly like all the other burned-out cities in Japan.There was a familiar pink blot, about two miles in diameter. It was dotted with charred trees and telephone poles. Only one of the cities twenty bridges was down. Hiroshima’s clusters of modern buildings in the downtown section stood upright.

It was obvious that the blast could not have been so powerful as we had been led to believe. It was extensive blast rather than intensive.

I had heard of buildings instantly consumed by unprecedented heat. Yet here I saw the buildings structurally intact, and what is more, topped by undamaged flag poles, lightning rods, painted railings, air raid precaution signs and other comparatively fragile objects.

At the T-bridge, the aiming point for the atomic bomb, I looked for the “bald spot” where everything presumably had been vaporized in the twinkling of an eye. It wasn’t there or anywhere else. I could find no traces of unusual phenomena.

What I did see was in substance a replica of Yokohama or Osaka, or the Tokyo suburbs – the familiar residue of an area of wood and brick houses razed by uncontrollable fire. Everywhere I saw the trunks of charred and leafless trees, burned and unburned chunks of wood. The fire had been intense enough to bend and twist steel girders and to melt glass until it ran like lava – just as in other Japanese cities.

The concrete buildings nearest to the centre of explosion, some only a few blocks from the heart of the atom blast, showed no structural damage. Even cornices, canopies and delicate exterior decorations were intact. Window glass was shattered, of course, but single-panel frames held firm; only window frames of two or more panels were bent and buckled. The blast impact therefore could not have been unusual.

Then I questioned a great many people who were inside such buildings when the bomb exploded. Their descriptions matched the scores of accounts I had heard from people caught in concrete buildings in areas hit by blockbusters. Hiroshima’s ten-story press building, about three blocks from the centre of the explosion, was badly gutted by the fire following the explosion, but otherwise unhurt. The people caught in the building did not suffer any unusual effects.

Most of the window panels were blown out of the Hiroshima hospital, about a mile from the heart of the explosion. Because there were no wooden structures nearby, however, it escaped fire. The people inside the hospital were not seriously affected by the blast. In general the effects here were analogous to those produced by the blast of a distant TNT bomb.

The total death, destruction and horror in Hiroshima were as great as reported. But the character of the damage was in no sense unique; neither the blast nor the heat was so tremendous as generally assumed.

In NAGASAKI, concrete buildings were gutted by fire but were still standing upright.

All of downtown Nagasaki, though chiefly wooden in construction, survived practically undamaged. It was explained that apparently it had been shielded from the explosion by intervening hills. But another part of Nagasaki, in a straight, unimpeded line from the explosion centre and not protected by the hills, also escaped serious damage. The Nagasaki blast had virtually dissipated itself by the time it reached this area. Few houses collapsed and none caught fire.

All destruction in Nagasaki has been popularly credited to the atom bomb. Actually, the city had been heavily bombed six days before. The famous Mitsubishi plant was badly punished by eight high-explosive direct hits.

What actually happened in Hiroshima and Nagasaki? There is little evidence of primary fire; that is to say, fire kindled by the heat of the explosive itself. The bomb presumably exploded too far above ground for that. If the temperature within the exploding area of an atom bomb is super high (and the effects in New Mexico tend to indicate that) then the heat must have been dissipated in space. What struck Hiroshima was the blast.

It was like a great fly swatter two miles broad, slapped down on a city of flimsy, half-rotted wooden houses and rickety brick buildings. It flattened them out in one blow, burying perhaps 200,000 people in the debris. Its effectiveness was increased by the incredible flimsiness of most Japanese structures, built of two-by-fours, termite-eaten and ry-rotted, and top-heavy with thick tile roofs.

The wooden slats of the collapsed houses were piled like so much kindling wood in your fireplace. Fires flared simultaneously in thousands of places, from short-circuits, over-turned stoves, kerosene lamps and broken gas mains. The whole area burst into one fantastic bonfire.

In incendiary attacks, people have a chance of escape. They run from their houses into the streets, to open places, to the rivers. In Hiroshima the majority had no such chance. Thousands of them must have been killed outright by falling walls and roofs; the rest were pinned down in a burning hell. Some 60,000, it is estimated, were burned to death.

Those who did manage to extricate themselves rushed for the bridges. There is reason to believe that one of the bridges collapsed under the weight of the frenzied mobs, although some maintain that it was brought down by the bomb blast. On the other bridges, the crush of hysterical humanity pushed out the railings, catapulting thousands to death by drowning. The missing railings were not wrenched out by the bomb blast as widely reported.

On a vast and horrifying scale it was fire, just fire, that took such high toll of life and property in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The victims did not die instantaneously in a sort of atomic dissolution. They died as people die in any fire. Quite possibly the blast was strong enough to cause internal injuries to many of those caught in the centre of explosion; particularly lung injuries – a familiar effect of ordinary high-explosive bombing.

Perhaps there were some deaths from radioactivity. I met people who had heard of casualties from radio burns and radio poisoning. But I could not obtain direct confirmation. The doctors and nurses at the hospitals I visited had no such cases under their care, though some of them had heard of such cases. I also interrogated fire fighters and Red Cross workers who had rushed to the scene in the first few minutes. They all denied personal knowledge of any lingering radioactivity.

Such are the facts as I found them – they seem to me tragic enough without pseudoscientific trimmings. I am not alone in my opinions. Scientific observers on the spot to whom I talked in general shared my point of view. Nothing official came from the War Department to justify the wild exaggeration. It simply is not true that matter was vaporized in the intense heat – if steel had evaporated certainly wood would have done the same, and undamaged wood abounds everywhere in the rubble. In neither of the bombed cities was there a bald spot such as was created in the New Mexico experiment, and both atom-bombed areas have tree trunks and walls with growing vines to disprove the claims of super heat.

The more painstakingly I analyze my observations, indeed, the more convinced I am that the same bombs dropped on New York or Chicago, Pittsburgh or Detroit, would have exacted no more toll on life than one of our big blockbusters, and the property damage might have been limited to broken window glass over a wide area. Tue, the atom bombs apparently were released too high for maximum effect. Exploded closer to the ground, the results of intense heat might have been impressive. But in that case the blast might have been localized, sharply reducing the area of destruction.

Three scientists at the University of Chicago took me severely to task for saying 200 B-29’s with incendiaries could have done as much damage. They pointed out “that if 200 Superforts with ordinary bombs could wipe out Hiroshima as a single atomic bomb did, the same number of planes could wipe 200 cities with atomic bombs.”

These experts merely forgot to mention one detail – that the 200 cities should be as flimsy as Hiroshima. On a steel-and-concrete city high explosives would have to be added to the job. One atomic bomb hurled at Hiroshima was equal to 200 Superforts; but in New York or Chicago a different kind of atomic bomb exploding in different fashion, would be needed before it could equal one Superfort loaded with high explosives.

It seems to me completely misleading to say that the atomic bomb used on Japan was “20,000 times more powerful” than a TNT blockbuster. From the view of total energy generated, this may be correct. But we are not concerned with the energy released into space. What we are concerned with is the portion which achieves effective demolition. From that point of view, the 20,000 figure is reduced immediately to 200 for a target like Hiroshima. For a target like New York, the figure of 20,000 drops to one or less.

However, the comparison of the atom bomb with a TNT bomb, at this stage of development, is like comparing a flaming torch with a pneumatic drill. Everything depends on whether you’re trying to burn a wooden fence or demolish a concrete wall. All we can say with certainty is that the atomic bomb proved supremely effective in destroying a highly flimsy and inflammable city. It was one of those cases when the right force was used against the right target at the right time to produce the maximum effect. Those who made the tactical decision to use it in these cases should be highly complimented.

The bomb dropped on Nagasaki was said to be a great many times more powerful than the one dropped on Hiroshima. Yet the damage in Nagasaki was much smaller. In Hiroshima 4.1 square miles were razed; in Nagasaki only one square mile. The improved atom bomb, in other words, was only about one fourth as effective!

Why? There are various theories, but no one knows for certain. It underlines the fat that something besides additional mass will be needed to produce greater results on the target. Eventually, of course, the problem of obtaining maximum results from atom missile will be solved. Methods will surely be found for dissipating less of the released energy in space and directing more of it to destruction.

The Chicago scientists reminded me in their statement that “the bombs dropped on Japan were the first atomic bombs ever made. They are firecrackers compared with what will be developed ten or 20 years.”

That is exactly the point I am trying to make: that they are as yet in the primitive stage. Humankind has stampeded into a state of near hysteria at the first exhibits of atomic destruction. Fantasy is running wild. There are those who think we ought to dispense with all other national defence. They talk of a dozen suicides who will put on false whiskers, take compact atomic bombs in suitcases, and blow this country to bits. Such hyperbole is exciting, but it is a dangerous basis for national thinking.

On the size of the bombs, incidentally, there has been much uninformed rhetoric. How do so many people know that the atomic bombs weighed only “a few ounces” or “a few pounds”? After all, our biggest bomber, not a pursuit plane, was chosen to carry it.

A conspiracy of circumstances whipped up atomic hysteria. The Japanese had every reason to propagate extreme versions. The atom bomb gave the perfect face saving excuse for surrender. They could now pretend that an almost supernatural element had intervened to force their defeat.

The BOMB provided a face saver for or leadership as well. Our leaders were deeply committed to invasion, insisting that there could be no victory without meeting the Japanese armies in traditional fashion. We were winning a victory over Japan through air power, but I am personally convinced that we would have gone through with the invasion anyway and paid the tragic and unnecessary cost in life. The momentum of the old assumptions was too great to be arrested.

The atom bomb instantly released everybody from past commitments. The nightmare of an invasion was cancelled, a miracle saving perhaps half a million American and several million Japanese lives. Though the Hiroshima and Nagasaki episodes added less than three percent to the material devastation already visited on Japan by air power, its psychological value was incalculable – for both the defeated and the victors.

The atom bomb fitted propaganda purposes. To isolationists it seemed final proof that we could let the rest of the world stew in its own juices – with our head start in atomic energy and our superior know-how, we were safe. The internationalists, on the other hand, tried to intimidate us by reminding us that we had no monopoly on science. Everyone could manufacture the atomic bomb, they said, and if we didn’t play ball we would be destroyed.

I am one of those who fought against inertia in the domain of air power. Consequently I am gratified that in relation to atomic energy the public is alert, that we are planning well ahead. But there is no call for the kind of frenzy that paralyzes understanding. Our only safety is in a calm confrontation of the truth.

I earnestly urge a cooling-off period on atomic speculation.

I am the last one to deny that atomic energy injects a vital and perhaps revolutionary new factor into military science and world relations. But I do not believe that the revolution has already taken place and that we should surrender all our normal faculties to a kind of atomic frenzy. Whatever we decide to do, let us do it calmly, logically and above all without doing violence to ascertainable facts.

 

6.4 Addendum 4

E-mail exchange with professor Alex Wellerstein 4 February 2015:

de “Alex Wellerstein” <wellerstein@gmail.com>

à “Anders BJORKMAN” <anders.bjorkman@wanadoo.fr>

date 04/02/15 17:21

objet Re: Your blog 7 January 2015

Hi Anders,

There is adequate evidence that fast nuclear fission is possible in enriched materials. This has been subjected to experimental testing repeatedly, and there are even reactors that operate on the principle. I stand my notion that theory is “dumb” — the reasoning is reflective of a lack of understanding of the principle of fast fission nuclear chain reactions, to say the least the preposterous notion that all scientists in the world have either been complete dupes on this very elementary issue (all in tandem) or have been fools. The “conspiracy” is untenable on first principles alone — Occam’s razor goes against it. This is aside from the silliness of the notion that all evidence (millions of pages of reports and experiments from tens of thousands of independent investigators in dozens of countries) on the history and legacy of nuclear testing has been falsified.

The Hiroshima/Nagasaki damages are in fact not typical of napalm damages. They are phenomenologically distinct. There are evidences of high pressure and high thermal flux, to say nothing of induced radioactivity from neutrons, at the atomic bombing sites. Napalm does not produce these kinds of effects. The similarities between the two are mostly superficial — firestorm, for example. But they have drastically different mortality rates (Hiroshima/Nagasaki were 2-4X more deadly per square mile than the Tokyo bombing, and the Tokyo bombing was itself considerably more deadly than any later firebombing, much less firebombings on cities of the size and makeup of Hiroshima and Nagasaki).

Similarly I do not think you have really considered the difficulty of faking footage and photographs of nuclear weapons. Even today, with advanced CGI, making something that looks compelling is non-trivially difficult. In the 1940s and 1950s it would have been impossible. The clouds in question are so much larger than those produced by conventional explosives — they are on the order of clouds produced by only immense releases of energy. The radioactive effluents produced by the megaton-range detonations in the 1950s were detectable by independent scientists all over the world. The size of the energy release that creates a cloud can be calculated roughly in retrospect should you ever be interested — nuclear detonations above the surface of the ground are always characterized by an uncommonly bright flash (a “double flash,” technically), and the size of the fireball, its rate of rise, and ultimate top altitude correlates very strongly with its energy release. That this should be true is fairly obvious from a first-principles analysis of the movement of very hot gasses through the atmosphere. The fact of the heavy “anvilling” of late-stage multi-megaton mushroom clouds, caused by their reaching (and sometimes breaching) the troposphere, is evidence of their great explosive output. Conventional explosives simply cannot reach temperatures that would allow them to do such a thing.

You ask for a peer-reviewed paper on fast fission without a moderator — just search for “fast-neutron reactor” and you will find evidence of whole facilities, much less their peer-reviewed output, about such reactions in non-bomb contexts. Finding evidence of this sort of thing is so trivial that I can only conclude you have not looked, or that you have concluded, a priori, that all evidence that contradicts you, no matter how copious and spread out among people who have nothing to gain or lose from playing the part of their conspiracy, must have been faked.

As for how to photograph a nuclear explosion, please just read some of the basic literature on fireball and cloud formation. It is not “pure energy” — the energy that is released comes primarily from kinetic repulsion of fission fragments and secondary radiations. Much of this initial energy is absorbed into the atmosphere surrounding the fireball (which is the cause of the “double flash” phenomena, because it briefly renders it opaque to visible radiation). All matter at the centre of the fireball is converted into an intensely heated gas. This is the fireball that rises, eventually forming the familiar “mushroom” shape because of Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities as it passes through the atmosphere, its surface cooling and becoming more “cloud-like.” As it meets resistance it begins to flatten. The heat of the initial fireball (which is a result of the explosive yield) determines both how fast it rises and how high it eventually rises, and the resistance it encounters along way (say, from the troposphere), causes it to flatten even more dramatically. What I find bizarre is that you clearly believe it is possible for TNT to do this sort of thing (which it can, on a smaller scale), but somehow you accord nuclear energy a magical, “pure energy” quality that would somehow make it exempt from this rather basic behaviour.

I do not expect, nor require, a response from you — the only way for someone to get so deep into such a confused notion of the world is to buy in wholeheartedly, and I suspect you are well beyond reasoning on this. I write only the above so that you can get a sense of the very trivial, yet very damning, objections that immediately will come to mind to anyone who is not searching for a new “hidden theory of the world” (e.g. conspiracy theory) for its own sake.

I have little time to waste on nonsense, but since you took the time to write to me, and I did disparage your theory openly, I felt it was worth one reply. As a human being who does seek out the truth, who is happy to reconsider old dogmas, who is happy to search for evidence for new ideas, I do urge you: this is a dumb theory. It does not hold up to even the most basic logical attack. It is not worth devoting too much of your life to; it will never repay your investment of time. I do not expect you to heed any of this, because I have met cranks in the past (of all sorts), and know their ways, but I feel compelled to say it.

best,

Alex

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Anders BJORKMAN <anders.bjorkman@wanadoo.fr> wrote:

Hallo Alex,

I just came across your blog at http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2015/01/07/bad-history-meets-bad-journalism/#footnote_2_5571 about “the random engineer who came up with this dumb theory”.

Well, my web site http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm, just up-dated with your suggestions is the only one that promotes the “dumb” theory that:

(A) nuclear fission is not possible without a moderator,

(B) Hiroshima/Nagasaki bomb damages are typical Tokyo/Yokohama napalm fire bombing damages and

(C) all atomic a-bomb mushroom photos are faked,

Note that I am not a random engineer and my theory or findings are neither dull nor stupid – just not politically correct.

But maybe you are a pseudo-professor? Prove me wrong!

So – start to give me A) a link to a peer reviewed paper about nuclear fission without moderator, B) evidence that Hiroshima bomb damages are typical a-bomb damages and C) an explanation why pure energy released in air by fission produces a mushroom cloud that can be photographed.

Regards

Anders Björkman, M.Sc.

 

The following started the whole thing – from http://blog.nuclearsecrecy.com/2015/01/07/bad-history-meets-bad-journalism/#footnote_2_5571 :

Some of the stuff strikes me as improbable or a little crack-potish; some of it seems plausible and interesting. I’m a firm believer in the idea that sometimes non-academic historians stumble onto interesting things and interesting questions (John Coster-Mullen is a great example of this), and I don’t discriminate unless people show themselves to be going down truly untenable paths (like that small segment of the Internet who believes that all nuclear weapons are a hoax, which is just a truly silly “theory”).3

 

Footnote 3:

For those who are curious: The “all nukes are a hoax” theory seems to stem from a couple different sources. The technical argument is that fast neutron chain reactions are impossible, because the fission cross-section of U235 is small for fast neutrons. The cross-section is indeed small for high-energy neutrons, which is why reactors use a moderator to slow the neutrons down and increase the likelihood of their capture by the small amounts of U235 in the nuclear fuel. What is weird is that the people making this argument don’t seem to realize that this is exactly why you use 80-90% enriched material in a bomb – it is to overcome this low probability of fissioning by just putting a ridiculous number of targets in the area. It is also why there are tampers, neutron reflectors, and the like, and also why even a relatively sophisticated weapon like the Fat Man only fissioned something like 13-18% of its fissile material, and the Little Boy bomb only fissioned around 1% of its fissile material. They also have weirdly interpreted the “Hiroshima and Nagasaki are not that different from the firebombing of Tokyo” argument (to a rather absurd conclusion, that it was just a firebombing, despite the fact that firebombing and atomic bombing have really different outcomes), believe that the photographs of the mushroom clouds are all faked (despite the fact that such a level of fakery was really quite beyond the technology of the 1940s – similar to the “Apollo moon hoax,” it would have been easier to make an atomic bomb in the 1940s than to fake an atomic bomb convincingly on film, at least to the degree of documentation that we have on them from the time), and believe that every scientist in the entire world (except for the random engineer who came up with this dumb theory) is in on the secret and has reasons to propagate it indefinitely (and I am apparently in on the hoax as well, to my surprise). The one person I e-mailed with about this, just trying to see what the limits of their rationality were and what it spawned from, eventually let on that to him, one of the most convincing pieces of evidence for this theory is the number of Jews who were involved in the creation of the bomb, wink wink, nudge nudge. This probably hits at the real origin of this bad idea – just another form of mis-matched anti-Semitism grafting itself onto another source. That my last name is a Jewish-sounding one did not apparently resonate with the person e-mailing me. [?]

 

7.1 Why this web page?

It is very easy to manipulate people to believe in many things apart from a-bombs. E.g. moon travel, 911 global collapses, RMS Titanic 1912 sinking, etc, etc.

I believed in moon travel 1969 and in the stories about Titanic colliding with an ice berg, when I was a young man. Later, much later, I know better and how I was misled and lied to.

Me and the a-bombI am a child of the Cold War and the a-bomb. My family and I lived in the capital. When I was seven years old, the government told us that the capital and us could be wiped out by an a-bomb dropped by a big country to the east and that we should be prepared. In the telephone book was info what to do, when being wiped out by an a-bomb. Those who had no telephone or telephone book could read about it in brochures about the same thing. At school we were told to be prepared. My father was terrified. He immediately booked tickets to go to New Zealand by ship for us and bought a house 30 kilometres outside the capital.

A-bombs were regularly tested at Novaya Zemlya in the northeast and clouds of atomic radiation dust swept in over us, we were told. By chance the embassy of the country testing a-bombs at Novaya Zemlya was just on the other side of our backyard fence, so it could be concluded that no a-bomb would be dropped in our backyard. My mother speaking the language of our neighbours thought so. Do not worry, she said! 1956 there were problems in Hungary and demonstrations took place outside our neighbour’s embassy and I could not get home. Police chased everybody away. But I live there, I said, and pointed … to the house at the side. Then I realized that the world maybe wasn’t what I thought.

My country had a big navy and I worked for it for a while. Military service! The biggest naval shipyard was in the centre of the capital and probably the target of the a-bomb. I started to work there 1966. Later the whole shipyard moved underground in an a-bomb proof shelter a little south of the capital. Imagine that. A whole shipyard inside a mountain! I worked there 1970. It looked safe. You walked down through a long tunnel with double, a-bomb proof doors and inside the mountain was our office, workshops, store rooms, dry docks, everything. James Bond ++! Amazing. Evidently I believed in a-bombs, then. In the navy we were taught how to protect us against ABC – Atomic, Biological, Chemical – warfare. If you didn’t follow and obeyed orders you were shot! In war. In peace you had to stay 48 hrs in a prison cell.

My father had, unhappily, made his military service in the infantry during WW2. Like most of our family. If you are going to die for your country, it must be on the muddy, shitty potato fields of glory, they thought. I had other ideas. The sea! And not to drown!

All children had to be tested two days for military service and I was prepared. First day was a lot of tests, physical, intelligence, etc, and second day interviews and decisions. Most children were sent to infantry unless they were not social at all and had been sent to sea at 13 … then you were navy. I was taken aside and asked what kind of military service I had planned to do. Special services navy, I said. I assumed the military selection board must have been impressed by my IQ 200 score in the tests the day before. How I achieved it is another story. Nobody evidently has IQ 200!

I dutifully made my military, navy service and then … I couldn’t get a job in my dear country. So I moved away … and there we are today. Isn’t life full of surprises? I have learnt a lot since then, so …

… the 911 WTC destructions at NY 2001 didn’t fool me.

 

The Islamic republic dictatorship (of Iran) stresses since 34 years, i.e. from 1979, that its nuclear program that started already in the 1950’s assisted by the USA is for peaceful purposes only, i.e. power generation and medical work, etc.

The five members of the UN Seurity Council, the 5 – USA, Russia, France, United Kingdom and China (all saying they have working a-bombs – which isn’t true, they are all fakes) – and the IAEA (that only deals with civilian, peaceful atomic energy and cannot prove that a-bombs work – I have asked!) suggest the opposite today. They suggest the Islamic republic dictatorship is planning to build a fake, a-bomb using enriched Uranium U235.

The Islamic republic dictatorship headed by Ali Khamenei, supreme leader of the revolution to establish an islamic dictatorship, is against all types of weapons of mass destruction, WMDs, i.e. biological, chemical and nuclear and has signed all international conventions in this respect. The Islamic republic dictatorship should therefore make PR for this web page. But it doesn’t. It seems the Islamic republic dictatorship likes to obtain afake a-bomb.

November 2013 the 5+1 (Germany) all meet the Islamic republic dictatorship at Geneva, Switzerland, to sort out the matter with IAEA looking on. The Iran delegation is headed by Mohammad Javad Zarif, MJZ. MJZ and all the others evidently know that a-bombs do not function but that fake (non-working) a-bombs make your penis grow 500% and impress stupid people. So MJZ will talk and talk … so that Iran can say it has a fake a-bomb. And USA, Russia, France, United Kingdom and China will not say much as they already has fake a-bombs. Strange thing is Germany. The have no fake a-bomb and does not want it. Why not say so?

The discussions at Geneva is whether Iran can enrich Uranium to >20% U235 using its >19 000 centrifuges in order to produce a fake a-bomb that requires 95% U235. As seen in chart right you need a fair amount of energy (and centrifuges) to enrich to 5% U235 for a nuclear power plant, i.e. 900 SWU, less energy (and centrifuges) to 20% U235 for medical use, i.e. 1 125 – 900 = 225 SWU, and much less to 95% U235 (and only a few centrifuges) for your fake a-bomb, i.e. 1 300 – 1 125 = 175 SWU. The reason is that the mass of material being enriched progressively diminishes and requires less effort relative to what has already been applied before.

It is thus very easy to enrich from 20 to 95% U235using some 100’s of centrifuges out of >19 000 and impossible to verify by IAEA.

Energy requir to enrich Uranium


Uranium enriched >20% U235 is useless except to enlarge your penis, and that’s why the talks at Geneva cannot be finished early. USA, Russia, France, United Kingdom and China like their fake a-bombs.
One problem is that Israel will bomb Iran, if Iran has a fake a-bomb.

Of course Israel has only fake a-bombs itself, so it will bomb Iran with chemical bombs. And maybe it is the whole idea of the show? Like USA bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan 1945.

On 23 November 2013 an agreement was reached between the Islamic republic dictatorship and USA, Russia, France, United Kingdom, China and Germany at Geneva. IAEA is allowed to check the Iranian production of enriched U235 that will not exceed 5%, blah, blah. And the fake a-bomb will live on.


History is just repeating itself most of the time. Don’t worry! Be happy!Visit also THE NEW-CLEAR WEAPONS PSY-OP

These pages/videos may contain copyrighted (©) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, POLITICAL, HUMAN RIGHTS, economic, DEMOCRACY, scientific, MORAL, ETHICAL, and SOCIAL JUSTICE ISSUES, and to find a peaceful solution for both the planet and mankind, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes.
Many governments and their intelligence services agengies actively campaign against the information found in our reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come. A stance that SEAWAPA.org, and tolaos.com are strongly disagree with in believing that it is every human being right to know the truth. Due to our missions conflicts with those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like us.